Skip to main content

A Twenty-First Century Skills Lens on the Common Core State Standards and the Next Generation Science Standards

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Educational Assessment in an Information Age ((EAIA))

Abstract

The changing natures of technology, competition in the global job market, and college and career readiness have impacted the skills and knowledge that young people need to be successful in today’s global economy (Trilling B, Fadel C, Royal society for the encouragement of arts, manufactures and commerce journal. A game of skills. What talents do young people need to thrive in the 21st century?, 2012). In the United States, the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) provide an opportunity to transform education standards to be more aligned with the needs of today’s world. By the end of 12th grade, all students should possess sufficient knowledge of science to engage in public discussion of related issues, be careful consumers of scientific and technological information related to their everyday lives, and have the skills to enter a career of their choice, including but not limited to careers in STEM (NRC, A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2012b). The National Research Council’s (NRC) Science Framework for K-12 Science Education (2012b) lays out an agenda that can begin to reshape what students need to know and be able to cultivate as twenty-first century leaders in science and citizenship. Furthermore, it has become evident that strong linkages between twenty-first century skills and scientific and engineering practices will provide insight into deeper learning of STEM content and to certain clusters of twenty-first century skills (NRC, Education for life and work: developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2012a).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adamson, F., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2015). Policy pathways for 21st century skills. In P. Griffin & E. Care (Eds.), The assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach (pp. 293–310). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autor, D. H., Katz, L. F., & Kearney, M. S. (2008). Trends in US wage inequality: Revising the revisionists. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(2), 300–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice- based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellanca, K. (2014) Professional learning experiences: There is no quick fix. http://p2.org/news-events/p21blog/1422-professional-learning. 27 May, 1(4), No. 14.

  • Bishop, T. (2013). Recognizing the Importance of STEM Education. In Congress.gov. http://beta.congress.gov/members.

  • Boix Mansilla, V., & Jackson, A. (2011). Educating for global competence: Preparing our youth to engage. New York: CCSSO, Asia Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressler, D. (2014). Better than business-as-usual: Improving scientific practices during discourse and writing by playing a collaborative mystery game. double helix. Journal of Critical Thinking & Writing, 2, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-C., Hand, B., & McDowell, L. (2013). The effects of writing-to-learn activities on elementary students’ conceptual understanding: Learning about force and motion through writing to older peers. Science Education, 97(5), 745–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cisco (2008). Equipping every global leader for the 21st century. ://newsroom.cisco.com/feature content;jsessionid=68602DD6F8BFD10FFDDC55815F165989?type=webcontent&articeId=4323028.

  • Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S., & Ball, D. L. (2002). Resources, instruction, and research. In F. Mosteller & R. Boruch (Eds.), Evidence matters: Randomized trials in education research (pp. 80–119). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Chung Wei, R. A., Richardson, A. N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. Oxford: National Staff Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18.(1 February, 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup (2013). 21st century skills and the workplace; A 2013 Microsoft Partners in Learning and Pearson Foundation Study. http://www.gallup.com/poll/162818/21st-century-skills-linked-work-success.aspx.

  • Garet, M. A., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B., & Suk Yoon, K. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulamhussein, A. (2013). Teaching the teachers: Effective professional development in an era of high stakes accountability. Alexandria: Center for Public Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (2003). What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 84(10), 748–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), The second handbook of research in mathematics education. Reston: New Age and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1065–1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdés, G. (2013). Science and language for english language learners in relation to next generation science standards and with implications for common core state standards for english language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223–233. doi:10.3102/0013189X13480524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2004). The new division of labor: How computers are creating the next job market. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J., Holden, C., Jan, M.-F., Martin, J. (2008). Sick at South Shore Beach: A place-based augmented reality game as a framework for building evidence-based arguments. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 8th international conference on International conference for the learning sciences – volume 3, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010a). Common core state standards for english language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010b). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2010). Exploring the intersection of science education and 21st century skills: A workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2012a). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: The National Academies.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2012b). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies.

    Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partnership for 21st Century Skills (P21) (2009). Framework for 21st century learning. Tucson. http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/P21_Framework.pdf.

  • Penuel, W., Fishman, B., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RAND Corporation. (2012). In A. R. Saavedra & V. Darleen Opfer (Eds.), Teaching and learning 21st century skills: Lessons from the learning sciences. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 905–994). Washington, DC: American Education Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saavedra, A., & Opfer, D. (2012). Learning 21st—century skills requires 21st—century teaching. Kappan, 94(2), 8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, J., & Olivares, R. (2011). Problem solving and collaboration using mobile serious games. Computers & Education, 57(3), 1943–1952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleicher, A. (Ed.). (2012). Preparing teachers and developing school leaders for the 21st century: Lessons from around the world. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M., Fischer, K. (2006). Useful metaphors for tackling problems in teaching and learning. Wiley: About Campus, 11, 2–9. doi:10.1002/abc.154

  • Sharritt, M. J. (2008). Forms of learning in collaborative video game play. Research & Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(2), 97–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow-Renner, R., & Lauer, P. (2005). Professional development analysis. Denver: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire, K. D., & Jan, M. (2007). Mad city mystery: Developing scientific argumentation skills with a place-based augmented reality game on handheld computers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squire, K., & Klopfer, E. (2007). Augmented reality simulations on handheld computers. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 371–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tishman, S., Jay, E., & Perkins, D. N. (1993). Teaching thinking dispositions: From transmission to enculturation. Theory Into Practice, 32, 147–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco: Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2012). Royal society for the encouragement of arts, manufactures and commerce journal. A game of skills. What talents do young people need to thrive in the 21st century?

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, T. (2010). The global achievement gap: Why even our best schools don't teach the new survival skills our children need and what we can do about it. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, C., Hand, B., & Prain, V. (2004). Writing and learning in the science classroom. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, I. R., & Pasley, J. D. (2009). Mathematics and science for a change: How to design, implement, and sustain high-quality professional development. Portsmouth: Heinema.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen B. Comfort .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Comfort, K.B., Timms, M. (2018). A Twenty-First Century Skills Lens on the Common Core State Standards and the Next Generation Science Standards. In: Care, E., Griffin, P., Wilson, M. (eds) Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Educational Assessment in an Information Age. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65368-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65368-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65366-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65368-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics