Skip to main content

Beyond “The Business Case”: The Emerging Role of Entrepreneurs in the Multilevel Governance of Urban Decarbonization in Canada

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Climate Change in Cities

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

  • 3343 Accesses

Abstract

In 2015, at the 21st Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), global leaders agreed that urgent, collaborative action on climate change is not only an environmental and social imperative but also represents a significant economic opportunity. The transition to a decarbonized global economy presents a challenge of unprecedented scale, yet a growing body of research identifies local level energy transition processes as an effective locus for action and change. There is an identified lack of systematic learning about transitions at the municipal level and this presents an ideal opportunity to address it through collaborative cross-sectoral research. This paper analyzes the case of Waterloo, Canada, through the lens of socio-technical transitions to assess potentially innovative pathways to a more sustainable (low carbon) future. In particular, we examine a new participatory process called Decarbonize Waterloo Region, a forum within which local stakeholders, scholars, and practitioners can envision low carbon futures and negotiate paths toward them. Participation in the forum as embedded scholars and the administration of post-forum surveys delivered insights into the effectiveness of this process, the partnerships, and policies at various levels of government that might be required to accelerate this sustainability transition, and the roles that entrepreneurs can play in driving innovation. Waterloo Region presents an interesting case as a municipality with a history as a hub of technological innovation, in which local entrepreneurs have played a significant part. The analysis of the Decarbonize Waterloo Region process will investigate how entrepreneurs can now be engaged to articulate and implement a vision to create a local hub of transition innovation. New actors and participatory processes are of particular interest. Our investigation probes the role of entrepreneurs in experimentation, a crucial part of sustainability transition processes. Innovative low-carbon energy solutions require testing before they can be scaled up, and local entrepreneurs have the potential to play a key role in the development, roll out and evaluation of those early experiments. Ultimately, we find that a clear picture of local energy systems and distinct set of challenges (as daunting and complex as they are) provided local stakeholders with places to start and arenas for ongoing innovation. The forum process also strengthened bonds among an expanding network of stakeholders who can now move forward with a collective desire to take on those challenges and transform their local energy picture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Following on Pelling et al. (2015), transformation can be thought of as a fundamental shift in the structure or function of a social-ecological system, including a rethinking of core values and relationships. Whether this is the result of accumulated incremental action or a more radical, disruptive shock, remains an issue of discussion and debate.

References

  • Biermann, F., Betsill, M., Gupta, J., Kanie, N., Lebel, L., Liverman, D., et al. (2009). Earth system governance: people, places, and the planet. Science and Implementation Plan of the Earth System Governance Project, Earth System Governance Project Report, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, J., & Fraser, E. D. (2008). Local authorities, climate change and small and medium enterprises: Identifying effective policy instruments to reduce energy use and carbon emissions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 156–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, H. (2016). STEPS 2016 annual lecture at the University of Sussex. Accessed at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KATUvvZ8fiw.

  • Bulkeley, H., & Castán Broto, V. (2013). Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(3), 361–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, H., Breitfuss, M., Coenen, L., Frantzeskaki, N., Fuenfschilling, L., Grillitsch, M., et al. (2015). Theoretical framework working paper on Urban living labs and urban sustainability transitions. Lund University, Lund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, S. (2010). In pursuit of resilient, low carbon communities: An examination of barriers to action in three Canadian cities. Energy Policy, 38, 7575–7585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burch, S. (2011). Development paths: Investigating the roots of responses to climate change. Sustainable Development, 19, 176–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burch, S. (2016). Will Ontario’s climate change action plan transform communities? Policy Brief No. 90, Centre for International Governance Innovation. Available at: https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/documents/PB%20No.90web_0.pdf.

  • Burch, S., Andrachuk, M., Carey, D., Frantzeskaki, N., Schroeder, H., Mischkowski, N., et al. (Forthcoming). Governing and accelerating transformative entrepreneurship: Exploring the potential for small business innovation on urban sustainability transitions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, S., Shaw, A., Dale, A., & Robinson, J. (2014). Triggering transformative change: A development path approach to climate change response in communities. Climate Policy 14, 467–487. business in sustainability transitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 20–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castan Broto, V., & Bulkeley, H. (2013). A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities. Global Environmental Change, 23, 92–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M., & Oreszczyn, T. (2012). The unintended consequences of decarbonising the built environment: A UK case study. Energy and Buildings, 46, 80–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driessen, P. P. J. (2015). Societal transformations in the face of climate change: Research priorities for the next decade. JPI Climate [online].

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment and Climate Change Canada. (2016). Canadian environmental sustainability indicators: Greenhouse gas emissions. Consulted on Feb 6, 2017. Available at: www.ec.gc.ca/indicateurs-indicators/default.asp?lang=en&n=FBF8455E-1.

  • Government of Canada. (2016). Pan-Canadian framework on clean growth and climate change: Canada’s plan to address climate change and grow the economy. Ottawa: Government of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooks, B. (1989). Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black. New York: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA. (2016). Decoupling of global emissions and economic growth confirmed. International Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, W. R., Nanda, R., & Rhodes-Kropf, M. (2014). Entrepreneurship as experimentation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 25–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinley, R. (2016). Climate change after Paris: From turning point to transformation. Climate Policy, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klewitz, J., & Hansen, E. G. (2014). Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klewitz, J., Zeyen, A., & Hansen, E. G. (2012). Intermediaries driving eco-innovation in SMEs: A qualitative investigation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15, 442–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loorbach, D., & Wijsman, K. (2013). Business transition management: Exploring a new role for business in sustainability transitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 20–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrone, A., & Moslener, U. (2016). Global trends in clean energy investment. United Nations Environment Program and Bloomberg New Energy Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analyzing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resources governance regimes. Global Environment Change, 19, 354–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, P., & Rowlands, I. H. (2007). City partners maintain climate change action despite national cuts: Residential energy efficiency programme valued at local level. Local Environment, 12, 505–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelling, M., O’Brien, K., & Matyas, D. (2015). Adaptation and transformation. Climatic Change, 133(1), 113–127. doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1303-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, L., Karpouzoglou, T., Doshi, S., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2015). Organising a safe space for navigating social-ecological transformations to sustainability. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12, 6027–6044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pidgeon, N. F., Poortinga, W., Rowe, G., Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J., & O’Riordan, T. (2005). Using surveys in public participation processes for risk decision making: The case of the 2003 British GM nation? Public debate. Risk Analysis, 25(2), 467–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O., Webler, T., & Wiedemann, P. (Eds.). (1995). Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8.

  • Robinson, P. (2005). Barriers to Canadian municipal response to climate change. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 14, 102–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2013). Personally relevant climate change the role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environment and Behavior, 45(1), 60–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer, S., Davis, S., & Thompson, J. L. (2013). Changing the conversation about climate change: A theoretical framework for place-based climate change engagement. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 7(1), 42–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, A., Sheppard, S., Burch, S., Flanders, D., Weik, A., Carmichael, J., et al. (2009). Making local futures tangible—Synthesizing, downscaling, and visualizing climate change scenarios for participatory capacity building. Global Environmental Change, 19, 447–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sova, C.A., Chaudhury, A., Helfgott, A., & Corner-Dolloff, C. (2012). Community-based adaptation costing: An integrated framework for the participatory costing of community-based adaptations to climate change in agriculture, CCAFS working paper 16. CCAFS, Denmark, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westley, F., Olsson, P., Folke, C., Homer-Dixon, T., Vredenburg, H., Loorbach, D., et al. (2011). Tipping toward sustainability: Emerging pathways of transformation. Ambio, 40(7), 762–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittmayer, Julia M., & Schäpke, Niko. (2014). Action, research and participation: Roles of researchers in sustainability transitions. Sustainability Science, 9(4), 483–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott Morton Ninomiya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ninomiya, S.M., Burch, S. (2018). Beyond “The Business Case”: The Emerging Role of Entrepreneurs in the Multilevel Governance of Urban Decarbonization in Canada. In: Hughes, S., Chu, E., Mason, S. (eds) Climate Change in Cities. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65003-6_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics