Abstract
Interactions between functionally specialized brain regions are crucial for normal brain function. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is suited to capture these interactions because it provides whole head measurements of brain activity with temporal resolution in the millisecond range. Many different measures of connectivity exist, and in order to take the connectivity analysis results at face value, one should be aware of the strengths and weaknesses of these measures. Next to this, an important challenge in MEG connectivity analysis lies in the fact that more than one sensor picks up the activity of any underlying source. This field spread severely limits the utility of connectivity measures computed directly between sensor recordings. As a consequence, neuronal interactions should be ideally studied on the level of the reconstructed sources. MEG is well suited for this purpose, since its signal properties and high spatial sampling allow for relatively accurate unmixing of the sensor recordings. This chapter provides some necessary background on connectivity analysis in general and proceeds by describing the challenges that are associated with the analysis of MEG-based connectivity at the sensor level. Source-level approaches are described, and some recent advances with respect to MEG-based connectivity during the resting state and graph theoretic approaches are described.
References
Astolfi L, Cincotti F, Mattia D, Babiloni C, Carducci F, Basilisco A, Rossini PM, Salinari S, Ding L, Ni Y et al (2005) Assessing cortical functional connectivity by linear inverse estimation and directed transfer function: simulations and application to real data. Clin Neurophysiol 116(4):920–932
Atukeren E (2008) Christmas cards, Easter bunnies, and granger-causality. Qual Quant 42(6):835–844
Baccala LA, Sameshima K (2001) Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination. Biol Cybern 84(6):463–474
Baillet S, Mosher JC, Leahy RM (2001) Electromagnetic brain mapping. Sig Process Mag IEEE 18(6):14–30
Bassett DS, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Achard S, Duke T, Bullmore E (2006) Adaptive reconfiguration of fractal small-world human brain functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(51):19518–19523
Bassett DS, Bullmore ET, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Apud JA, Weinberger DR, Coppola R (2009) Cognitive fitness of cost-efficient brain functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(28):11747–11752
Beckmann CF, DeLuca M, Devlin JT, Smith SM (2005) Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 360(1457):1001–1013
Berger H (1929) Über das elektrenkephalogramm des menschen. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 87(1):527–570
Biswal B, Yetkin FZ, Haughton VM, Hyde JS (1995) Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med 34(4):537–541
Bressler SL, Seth AK (2011) Wiener-Granger causality: a well established methodology. NeuroImage 58(2):323–329
Brookes MJ, Woolrich M, Luckhoo H, Price D, Hale JR, Stephenson MC, Barnes GR, Smith SM, Morris PG (2011) Investigating the electrophysiological basis of resting state networks using magnetoencephalography. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:16783
Bullmore ET, Bassett DS (2011) Brain graphs: graphical models of the human brain connectome. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 7:113–140
Chen CC, Kiebel SJ, Friston KJ (2008) Dynamic causal modelling of induced responses. NeuroImage 41(4):1293–1312
David O, Friston KJ (2003) A neural mass model for MEG/EEG: coupling and neuronal dynamics. NeuroImage 20(3):1743–1755
David O, Garnero L, Cosmelli D, Varela FJ (2002) Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 49(9):975–987
David O, Cosmelli D, Hasboun D, Garnero L (2003) A multitrial analysis for revealing significant corticocortical networks in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography. NeuroImage 20(1):186–201
de Pasquale F, Della Penna S, Snyder AZ, Lewis C, Mantini D, Marzetti L, Belardinelli P, Ciancetta L, Pizzella V, Romani GL, Corbetta M (2010) Temporal dynamics of spontaneous MEG activity in brain networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(13):6040–6045
de Pasquale F, Della Penna S, Snyder AZ, Marzetti L, Pizzella V, Romani GL, Corbetta M (2012) A cortical core for dynamic integration of functional networks in the resting human brain. Neuron 74(4):753–764
Deco G, Corbetta M (2011) The dynamical balance of the brain at rest. Neuroscientist 17(1):107–123
Erdoes P, Renyi A (1959) On random graphs I. Publ Math 6:290–297
Fries P (2005) A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends Cogn Sci 9(10):474–480
Friston K (1994) Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: a synthesis. Hum Brain Mapp 2:56–78
Garrido MI, Kilner JM, Kiebel SJ, Stephan KE, Friston KJ (2007) Dynamic causal modelling of evoked potentials: a reproducibility study. NeuroImage 36(3):571–580
Ghuman AS, McDaniel JR, Martin A (2011) A wavelet-based method for measuring the oscillatory dynamics of resting-state functional connectivity in MEG. NeuroImage 56(1):69–77
Gomez-Herrero G, Atienza M, Egiazarian K, Cantero JL (2008) Measuring directional coupling between EEG sources. NeuroImage 43(3):497–508
Granger CWJ (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37:424–438
Gross J, Tass PA, Salenius S, Hari R, Freund HJ, Schnitzler A (2000) Cortico-muscular synchronization during isometric muscle contraction in humans as revealed by magnetoencephalography. J Physiol 527.(Pt 3:623–631
Gross J, Kujala J, Hamalainen M, Timmermann L, Schnitzler A, Salmelin R (2001) Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: studying neural interactions in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98(2):694–699
Gross J, Timmermann L, Kujala J, Dirks M, Schmitz F, Salmelin R, Schnitzler A (2002) The neural basis of intermittent motor control in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99(4):2299–2302
Gross J, Schmitz F, Schnitzler I, Kessler K, Shapiro K, Hommel B, Schnitzler A (2004) Modulation of long-range neural synchrony reflects temporal limitations of visual attention in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(35):13050–13055
Guggisberg AG, Honma SM, Findlay AM, Dalal SS, Kirsch HE, Berger MS, Nagarajan SS (2008) Mapping functional connectivity in patients with brain lesions. Ann Neurol 63(2):193–203
Haerle M, Rockstroh BS, Keil A, Wienbruch C, Elbert TR (2004) Mapping the brain’s orchestration during speech comprehension: task-specific facilitation of regional synchrony in neural networks. BMC Neurosci 5:40
Haufe S, Tomioka R, Nolte G, Müller KR, Kawanabe M (2010) Modeling sparse connectivity between underlying brain sources for EEG/MEG. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 57(8):1954–1963
Haufe S, Nikulin VV, Müller KR, Nolte G (2013) A critical assessment of connectivity measures for EEG data: a simulation study. NeuroImage 64:120–133
Hillebrand A, Barnes GR, Bosboom JL, Berendse HW, Stam CJ (2012) Frequency-dependent functional connectivity within resting-state networks: an atlas-based MEG beamformer solution. NeuroImage 59(4):3909–3921
Hipp JF, Engel AK, Siegel M (2011) Oscillatory synchronization in large-scale cortical networks predicts perception. Neuron 69(2):387–396
Hipp JF, Hawellek DJ, Corbetta M, Siegel M, Engel AK (2012) Large-scale cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity. Nat Neurosci 15:884–890
Ioannides AA (2007) Dynamic functional connectivity. Curr Opin Neurobiol 17(2):161–170
Jensen O, Colgin LL (2007) Cross-frequency coupling between neuronal oscillations. Trends Cogn Sci 11(7):267–269
Jerbi K, Lachaux J-P, N’Diaye K, Pantazis D, Leahy RM, Garnero L, Baillet S (2007) Coherent neural representation of hand speed in humans revealed by MEG imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(18):7676–7681
Kaminski M, Liang H (2005) Causal influence: advances in neurosignal analysis. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 33(4):347–430
Kiebel SJ, Garrido MI, Moran RJ, Friston KJ (2008) Dynamic causal modelling for EEG and MEG. Cogn Neurodyn 2(2):121–136
Kujala J, Pammer K, Cornelissen P, Roebroeck A, Formisano E, Salmelin R (2007) Phase coupling in a cerebro-cerebellar network at 8–13 Hz during reading. Cereb Cortex 17(6):1476–1485
Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J, Varela FJ (1999) Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum Brain Mapp 8(4):194–208
Luckhoo H, Hale JR, Stokes MG, Nobre AC, Morris PG, Brookes MJ, Woolrich MW (2012) Inferring task-related networks using independent component analysis in magnetoencephalography. NeuroImage 62(1):530–541
Makeig S, Westerfield M, Jung TP, Enghoff S, Townsend J, Courchesne E, Sejnowski TJ (2002) Dynamic brain sources of visual evoked responses. Science (New York, NY) 295(5555):690–694
Mantini D, Della Penna S, Marzetti L, de Pasquale F, Pizzella V, Corbetta M, Romani GL (2011) A signal-processing pipeline for magnetoencephalography resting-state networks. Brain Connect 1(1):49–59
Marinazzo D, Liao W, Chen H, Stramaglia S (2011) Nonlinear connectivity by Granger causality. NeuroImage 58(2):330–338
Moran RJ, Kiebel SJ, Stephan KE, Reilly RB, Daunizeau J, Friston KJ (2007) A neural mass model of spectral responses in electrophysiology. NeuroImage 37(3):706–720
Niedermeyer E, Silva FLD (2004) Electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, New York
Nolte G (2003) The magnetic lead field theorem in the quasi-static approximation and its use for magnetoencephalography forward calculation in realistic volume conductors. Phys Med Biol 48(22):3637–3652
Nolte G, Bai O, Wheaton L, Mari Z, Vorbach S, Hallett M (2004) Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the imaginary part of coherency. Clin Neurophysiol 115(10):2292–2307
Nolte G, Ziehe A, Nikulin VV, Schlogl A, Kramer N, Brismar T, Müller K-R (2008) Robustly estimating the flow direction of information in complex physical systems. Phys Rev Lett 100(23):234101–234104
Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen JM (2011) FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci 2011:156869
Palva S, Palva JM (2012) Discovering oscillatory interaction networks with M/EEG: challenges and breakthroughs. Trends Cogn Sci 16(4):219–230
Palva JM, Monto S, Kulashekhar S, Palva S (2010) Neuronal synchrony reveals working memory networks and predicts individual memory capacity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(16):7580–7585
Peelle JE, Gross J, Davis MH (2012) Phase-locked responses to speech in human auditory cortex are enhanced during comprehension. Cereb Cortex 23:1378
Penny WD, Litvak V, Fuentemilla L, Duzel E, Friston K (2009) Dynamic causal models for phase coupling. J Neurosci Methods 183(1):19–30
Romei V, Rihs T, Brodbeck V, Thut G (2008) Resting electroencephalogram alpha-power over posterior sites indexes baseline visual cortex excitability. Neuroreport 19(2):203–208
Schloegl A, Supp G, Christa N, Wolfgang K (2006) Analyzing event-related EEG data with multivariate autoregressive parameters. In: Event-related dynamics of brain oscillations. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 135–147
Schnitzler A, Gross J (2005) Normal and pathological oscillatory communication in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 6(4):285–296
Schoffelen J-M, Gross J (2009) Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG. Hum Brain Mapp 30(6):1857–1865
Schoffelen J-M, Oostenveld R, Fries P (2008) Imaging the human motor system’s beta-band synchronization during isometric contraction. NeuroImage 41(2):437–447
Schreiber T (2000) Measuring information transfer. Phys Rev Lett 85(2):461–464
Siegel M, Donner TH, Oostenveld R, Fries P, Engel AK (2008) Neuronal synchronization along the dorsal visual pathway reflects the focus of spatial attention. Neuron 60(4):709–719
Siegel M, Donner TH, Engel AK (2012) Spectral fingerprints of large-scale neuronal interactions. Nat Rev Neurosci 13:121–134
Sporns O (2011) Networks of the brain. MIT Press, Cambridge
Stam CJ (2004) Functional connectivity patterns of human magnetoencephalographic recordings: a ‘small-world’ network? Neurosci Lett 355(1–2):25–28
Stam CJ (2010) Use of magnetoencephalography (MEG) to study functional brain networks in neurodegenerative disorders. J Neurol Sci 289(1–2):128–134
Stam CJ, Van Dijk BW (2002) Synchronization likelihood: an unbiased measure of generalized synchronization in multivariate data sets. Physica D 163(3–4):236–251
Stam CJ, van Straaten EC (2012) The organization of physiological brain networks. Clin Neurophysiol 123(6):1067–1087
Stam CJ, Nolte G, Daffertshofer A (2007) Phase lag index: assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources. Hum Brain Mapp 28(11):1178–1193
Vicente R, Wibral M, Lindner M, Pipa G (2011) Transfer entropy–a model-free measure of effective connectivity for the neurosciences. J Comput Neurosci 30(1):45–67
Vinck M, Oostenveld R, van Wingerden M, Battaglia F, Pennartz CMA (2011) An improved index of phase-synchronization for electrophysiological data in the presence of volume-conduction, noise and sample-size bias. NeuroImage 55(4):1548–1565
Westlake KP, Hinkley LB, Bucci M, Guggisberg AG, Findlay AM, Henry RG, Nagarajan SS, Byl N (2012) Resting state alpha-band functional connectivity and recovery after stroke. Exp Neurol 237(1):160–169
Wiener N (1956) The theory of prediction, modern mathematics for engineers. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 165–190
Winter WR, Nunez PL, Ding J, Srinivasan R (2007) Comparison of the effect of volume conduction on EEG coherence with the effect of field spread on MEG coherence. Stat Med 26(21):3946–3957
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Schoffelen, JM., Gross, J. (2019). Studying Dynamic Neural Interactions with MEG. In: Supek, S., Aine, C. (eds) Magnetoencephalography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62657-4_18-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62657-4_18-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62657-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62657-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering