Skip to main content

Behavioral Aspects of Communication in Organizations

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter reviews experimental studies that investigate the effects of communication on behavior in organizational settings. Two main classes of studies are identified: (a) studies on coordination and competition, which include experimental research that tests whether communication can help to overcome coordination failure within organizations and (b) studies that analyze the role of communication in alleviating problems arising from information asymmetries at the workplace. The evidence from these studies indicates that communication is suited to improve efficient coordination within firms and to mitigate information problems in employer–employee relationships. In addition, studies are presented that focus on the interaction between communication and monetary incentive schemes in companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Andreoni J, Rao JM (2011) The power of asking: how communication affects selfishness, empathy, and altruism. J Public Econ 95:513–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Balliet D (2010) Communication and cooperation in social dilemmas: a meta-analytic review. J Confl Resolut 54:39–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ner A, Putterman L (2009) Trust, communication and contracts: an experiment. J Econ Behav Organ 70:106–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg J, Dickhaut J, McCabe K (1995) Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games Econ Behav 10:122–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume A, Ortmann A (2007) The effects of costless pre-play communication: experimental evidence from games with Pareto-ranked equilibria. J Econ Theory 132:274–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Bochet O, Putterman L (2009) Not just babble: opening the black box of communication in a voluntary contribution experiment. Eur Econ Rev 53(3):309–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Bochet O, Page T, Putterman L (2006) Communication and punishment in voluntary contribution experiments. J Econ Behav Organ 60(1):11–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton P, Dewatripont M (2005) Contract theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton G, Werner P (2016) The influence of potential on wages and effort. Exp Econ 19:535–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton GE, Chatterjee K, McGinn KL (2003) How communication links influence coalition bargaining: a laboratory investigation. Manag Sci 49(5):583–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandts J, Cooper D (2007) It’s what you say, not what you pay: an experimental study of manager-employee relationships in overcoming coordination failure. J Eur Econ Assoc 5:1223–1268

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandts J, Cooper D (2018) Truth be told – an experimental study of communication and centralization, Barcelona GSE working paper series – WP no 1046. Barcelona Graduate School of Economics, Barcelona, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandts J, Ellman M, Charness G (2016) Let’s talk: how communication affects contract design. J Eur Econ Assoc 14:943–974

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandts J, Cooper D, Rott C (2019) Communication in laboratory experiments. In: Schram A, Ule A (eds) Handbook of research methods and applications in experimental economics. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, USA. pp 401–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardella E, Depew B (2018) Output restriction and the ratchet effect: evidence from a real-effort work task. Games Econ Behav 107:182–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Cason T, Sheremeta R, Zhang J (2012) Communication and efficiency in competitive coordination games. Games Econ Behav 76:26–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Cason T, Sheremeta R, Zhang J (2017) Asymmetric and endogenous within-group communication in competitive coordination games. Exp Econ 20:946–972

    Google Scholar 

  • Casoria F, Riedl A (2013) Experimental labor markets and policy considerations: incomplete contracts and macroeconomic aspects. J Econ Surv 27:398–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Charness G (2000) Self-serving cheap talk: a test of Aumann’s conjecture. Games Econ Behav 33:177–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Charness G, Dufwenberg M (2006) Promises and partnership. Econometrica 74:1579–1601

    Google Scholar 

  • Charness G, Dufwenberg M (2010) Bare promises: an experiment. Econ Lett 107:281–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Charness G, Dufwenberg M (2011) Participation. Am Econ Rev 101:1211–1237

    Google Scholar 

  • Charness G, Kuhn P (2011) Lab labor: what can labor economists learn from the lab? In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds) Handbook of labor economics, vol 4A, 1st edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp 229–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Charness G, Rabin M (2005) Expressed preferences and behavior in experimental games. Games Econ Behav 53:151–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Charness G, Du N, Yang CL, Yao L (2013) Promises in contract design. Eur Econ Rev 64:194–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri A (2011) Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: a selective survey of the literature. Exp Econ 14(1):47–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri A, Graziano S, Maitra P (2006) Social learning and norms in a public goods experiment with inter-generational advice. Rev Econ Stud 73(2):357–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper DJ, Kagel JH (2005) Are two heads better than one? Team versus individual play in signaling games. Am Econ Rev 95(3):477–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper DJ, Kagel JH (2016) A failure to communicate: an experimental investigation of the effects of advice on strategic play. Eur Econ Rev 82:24–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper DJ, Lightle JP (2013) The gift of advice: communication in a bilateral gift exchange game. Exp Econ 16:443–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper R, DeJong D, Forsythe R, Ross T (1992) Communication in coordination games. Q J Econ 107:739–771

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford V (1998) A survey of experiments on communication via cheap talk. J Econ Theory 78(2):286–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford VP, Sobel J (1982) Strategic information transmission. Econometrica 50(6):1431–1451

    Google Scholar 

  • Dannenberg A (2015) Leading by example versus leading by words in voluntary contribution experiments. Soc Choice Welf 44(l):71–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies E, Fafchamps M (2017) Pledging, praising and shaming: experimental labour markets in Ghana. IZA DP no 10520. Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Hartog DN, Boon C, Verburg RM, Croon MA (2013) HRM, communication, satisfaction, and perceived performance: a cross-level test. J Manag 39:1637–1665

    Google Scholar 

  • Dohmen T (2014) Behavioral labor economics: advances and future directions. Labour Econ 30:71–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy J, Feltovich N (2002) Do actions speak louder than words? An experimental comparison of observation and cheap talk. Games Econ Behav 39:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy J, Feltovich N (2006) Words, deeds and lies: strategic behavior in games with multiple signals. Rev Econ Stud 73:669–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellingsen T, Östling R (2010) When does communication improve coordination? Am Econ Rev 100(4):1695–1724

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk A, Heckman JJ (2009) Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences. Science 326(5952):535–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell J, Rabin M (1996) Cheap talk. J Econ Perspect 10(3):103–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr D (2017) Costly communication and learning from failure in organizational coordination. Eur Econ Rev 93:106–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E, Gächter S (2000) Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Am Econ Rev 90:980–994

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E, Kirchsteiger G, Riedl A (1993) Does fairness prevent market clearing? An experimental investigation. Q J Econ 108:437–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Goeree J, Zhang J (2014) Communication & competition. Exp Econ 17:421–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbring C (2006) The effect of communication in incentive systems – an experimental study. Manag Decis Econ 27:333–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbring C, Irlenbusch B (2011) Sabotage in tournaments: evidence from a laboratory experiment. Manag Sci 57:611–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris TE, Nelson MD (2007) Applied organizational communication: theory and practice in a global environment. Routledge, Hillsdale NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison GW, List JA (2004) Field experiments. J Econ Lit 42(4):1009–1055

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe EI, Schmitz PW (2018) Hidden action and outcome contractibility: an experimental test of moral hazard theory. Games Econ Behav 109:544–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson SJ (2014) Chap 2, The importance of communication in fulfilling the strategic role of HRM. In: Miller V, Gordon M (eds) Meeting the challenge of human resource management. Routledge, Hillsdale NJ, USA. pp 16–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac RM, Walker JM (1988) Communication and free-riding behavior: the voluntary contribution mechanism. Econ Inq 26(4):585–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Işgin E (2017) Communication versus information transparency in one-shot interactions: a labor market experiment. Manag Decis Econ 38:955–963

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriss P, Blume A, Weber R (2016) Coordination with decentralized costly communication. J Econ Behav Organ 130:225–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvaløy O, Nieken P, Schöttner A (2015) Hidden benefits of reward: a field experiment on motivation and monetary incentives. Eur Econ Rev 76:188–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt SD, List JA (2007) What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? J Econ Perspect 21(2):153–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt SD, List JA (2009) Field experiments in economics: the past, the present, and the future. Eur Econ Rev 53(1):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Masclet D, Noussair CN, Villeval MC (2013) Threat and punishment in public good experiments. Econ Inq 51(2):1421–1441

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohlin E, Johannesson M (2008) Communication: content or relationship? J Econ Behav Organ 65:409–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Oprea R, Charness G, Friedman D (2014) Continuous time and communication in a public-goods experiment. J Econ Behav Organ 108:212–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E, Walker J, Gardner R (1992) Covenants with and without a sword: self-governance is possible. Am Polit Sci Rev 86:404–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogrebna G, Krantz DH, Schade C, Keser C (2011) Words versus actions as a means to influence cooperation in social dilemma situations. Theory Decis 71(4):473–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedl A, Rohde IM, Strobel M (2016) Efficient coordination in weakest-link games. Rev Econ Stud 83:737–767

    Google Scholar 

  • Schotter A (2003) Decision making with naive advice. Am Econ Rev 93(2):196–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutter M, Strassmair C (2009) Communication, cooperation and collusion in team tournaments – an experimental study. Games Econ Behav 66:506–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Huyck JB, Battalio RC, Beil RO (1990) Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty, and coordination failure. Am Econ Rev 80:234–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelmer J (2003) Linear public goods experiments: a meta-analysis. Exp Econ 6:299–310

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arno Riedl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Casoria, F., Riedl, A., Werner, P. (2020). Behavioral Aspects of Communication in Organizations. In: Zimmermann, K.F. (eds) Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_149-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_149-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57365-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57365-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics