Abstract
Research has suggested regular breaks in sedentary office work are important for health, wellbeing and long-term productivity. Although many computerized break reminders exist, few are based on user needs and requirements as determined by formative research. This paper reports empirical findings from a diary-probed interview study with 20 office workers on their perceived barriers and facilitators to taking regular micro-breaks at work. This work makes two contributions to the Persuasive Technology (PT) community: a diagnosis of the full range of determinants and levers for changing office work break behaviours; a demonstration of applying the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW), an intervention development framework originating from Health Psychology, to elicit theory-based design recommendations for a potential PT.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aarts, H., Custers, R.: Unconscious goal pursuit: nonconscious goal regulation and motivation. In: Ryan, R. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation, pp. 232–247. Oxford University Press, New York (2012)
Bargh, J.A., Ferguson, M.J.: Beyond behaviorism: on the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychol. Bull. 126(6), 925–945 (2000)
Cane, J., et al.: Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement. Sci. 7(1), 37 (2012)
Cirillo, F.: The Pomodoro Technique. FC Garage, Berlin (2013)
Consolvo, S., et al.: Theory-driven design strategies for technologies that support behavior change in everyday life. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2009, pp. 405–414 (2009)
Fogg, B.: A behavior model for persuasive design. In: The 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, p. 40. ACM Press, New York (2009)
Francis, J.J., et al.: Evidence-based selection of theories for designing behaviour change interventions: using methods based on theoretical construct domains to understand clinicians’ blood transfusion behaviour. Br. J. Health Psychol. 14(Pt 4), 625–646 (2009)
French, S.D., et al.: Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Implement. Sci. 7(1), 38 (2012)
Fritz, C., et al.: It’s the little things that matter: an examination of knowledge workers’ energy management. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 25, 28–39 (2011)
Herrmanny, K., Ziegler, J., Dogangün, A.: Supporting users in setting effective goals in activity tracking. In: Meschtscherjakov, A., Ruyter, B., Fuchsberger, V., Murer, M., Tscheligi, M. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2016. LNCS, vol. 9638, pp. 15–26. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31510-2_2
Jett, Q.R., George, J.M.: Work interrupted: a closer look at the role of interruptions in organizational life. Acad. Manage. Rev. 28, 494–507 (2003)
Mark, G., et al.: No task left behind? Examining the nature of fragmented work. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2005, pp. 321–330 (2005)
Michie, S., et al.: The Behaviour Change Wheel: A Guide to Designing Interventions. Silverback Publishing, London (2014)
Owen, N., et al.: Too much sitting: a novel and important predictor of chronic disease risk? Br. J. Sports Med. 43(2), 81–83 (2009)
Pate, R.R., et al.: The evolving definition of “sedentary”. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 36(4), 173–178 (2008)
Prochaska, J.O., Velicer, W.F.: The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am. J. Heal. Promot. AJHP 12(1), 38–48 (1997)
Ryan, C.G., et al.: Sitting patterns at work: objective measurement of adherence to current recommendations. Ergonomics 54(6), 531–538 (2011)
Srivastava, A., Thomson, S.B.: Framework analysis: a qualitative methodology for applied policy research. J. Adm. Gov. 4(2), 72–79 (2009)
Tremblay, M.S., et al.: Physiological and health implications of a sedentary lifestyle. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 35(6), 725–740 (2010)
West, R.: Time for a change: putting the Transtheoretical (Stages of Change) Model to rest. Addiction 100, 1036–1040 (2005)
Züger, M., Fritz, T.: Interruptibility of software developers and its prediction using psycho-physiological sensors. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2015, pp. 2981–2990 (2015)
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank Kathryn Morgan and Rachael Travers for helping transcribe interviews, and Anna Roberts for reviewing the coding and intervention mapping. This research was supported by the Horizon Centre for Doctoral Training at the University of Nottingham (RCUK Grant No. EP/L015463/1) and by the RCUK’s Horizon Digital Economy Research Institute (RCUK Grant No. EP/G065802/1) and Unilever UK Ltd. The study received ethics approval from School of Computer Science Ethics Committee, University of Nottingham.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Huang, Y., Benford, S., Hendrickx, H., Treloar, R., Blake, H. (2017). Office Workers’ Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Taking Regular Micro-breaks at Work: A Diary-Probed Interview Study. In: de Vries, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Siemons, L., Beerlage-de Jong, N., van Gemert-Pijnen, L. (eds) Persuasive Technology: Development and Implementation of Personalized Technologies to Change Attitudes and Behaviors. PERSUASIVE 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10171. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55134-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55134-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55133-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55134-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)