Abstract
Students in K-12 classrooms must be actively engaged in all three dimensions of the science framework (Scientific and Engineering Practices, Cross-Cutting Concepts, and Disciplinary Core Ideas) to promote both language and science learning. (See Table 4.1 for select elements of this framework). Under the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) (NGSS Lead States 2013), science education is expected to reflect how science functions in the real world.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alberts, B. (2000). Some thoughts of a scientist on inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E. Van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 3–13). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Baker, S., Lesaux, N., Jayanthi, M., Dimino, J., Proctor, C. P., Morris, J., Gersten, R., Haymond, K., Kieffer, M. J., Linan-Thompson, S., & Newman-Gonchar, R. (2014). Teaching academic content and literacy to English learners in elementary and middle school. IES Practice Guide. NCEE 2014–4012. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/practice_guides/english_learners_pg_040114.pdf.
Barron, B., Schwartz, D., Vye, N., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., Bransford, J., & Cognition, T. and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 271–311. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/monicaru/Public/old%20stuff/For%20Dava/Grad%20Library.Data/PDF/Brigid_1998DoingwithUnderstanding-LessonsfromResearchonProblem-andProject-BasedLearning-1896588801/Brigid_1998DoingwithUnderstanding-LessonsfromResearchonProblem-andProject-BasedLearning.pdf.
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2012). Primary sources 2012: America’s teachers on the teaching profession. Seattle, WA: Author.
Blumenfeld, P. C., Kempler, T. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006). Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 475–488). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Boaler, J. (2002). Learning from teaching: exploring the relationship between reform curriculum and equity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(4), 239–258. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6292/668fbace9d59357117f05053a9aa7b04e8b9.pdf.
Boss, S. (2015). Implementing project-based learning. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
Davison, C. (2006). Collaboration between ESL and content area teachers: How do we know when we are doing it right?. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(4), 454–475.
de Oliveira, L. C. (2016). A language-based approach to content instruction (LACI) for English language learners: Examples from two elementary teachers. International Multilingual Research Journal, 10(3), 217–231. doi: 10.1080/19313152.2016.118591.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Boston, MA: D. C. Heath & Co..
Dewey, J. (1938/1963). Experience and education. New York, NY: Collier Books.
Education for Sustainable Communities. (2011). Expeditionary learning. Retrieved from https://sites.tufts.edu/uep284edu/national-happenings/expeditionary-learning/.
Geier, R., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., & Clay-Chambers, J. (2008), Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry-based science curricula in the context of urban reform. Journal of Research in S. Teaching 45, 922–939. doi: 10.1002/tea.20248.
Gottlieb, M., & Ernst-Slavit, G. (2014). Academic language in diverse classrooms: Definitions and contexts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Harris, C. J., & Rooks, D. L. (2010). Managing inquiry-based science: Challenges in enacting complex science instruction in elementary and middle school classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 227–240. doi: 10.1007/s10972-009-9172-5.
Hart, C., Mulhall, P., Berry, A., Loughran, J., & Gunstone, R. (2000). What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 655–675.
Honigsfeld, A., & Dove, M. G. (2010). Collaboration and co-teaching: Strategies for English learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Honigsfeld, A., & Dove, M. G. (Eds.) (2012). Coteaching and other collaborative practices in the EFL/ESL classroom: Rationale, research, reflections, and recommendations. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Honigsfeld, A., & Dove, M. G. (2014). Collaboration and co-teaching for English learners: A leader’s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J., & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the standard for project based learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdes, G. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to next generation science standards and with implications for common core state standards for English language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223–233. doi: 10.3102/0013189x13480524.
Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education. In R. Keith Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 371–387). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Mirel, J., & Goldin, S. (2012). Alone in the classroom: Why teachers are too isolated. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/04/alone-in-the-classroom-why-teachers-are-too-isolated/255976/ .
Murawski, W. W. (2009). Collaborative teaching in elementary schools: Making the co-teaching marriage work!. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
National Academy of Sciences. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/read/18290
O’Hara, S., Zwiers, J., & Pritchard, R. (2013). Framing the development of complex language and literacy. Retrieved from http://www.aldnetwork.org/sites/default/files/pictures/aldn_brief_2013.pdf.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2012). Academic language in teaching and learning: introduction to the special issue. The Elementary School Journal, 112(3), 409–418.
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & McDuffie, K. A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73, 392–416.
Spratt, J., & Florian, L. (2013). Applying the principles of inclusive pedagogy in initial teacher education: From university based course to classroom action. Revista de InvestigaciÓn en EducaciÓn, 11(3), 133–140.
Turkan, S., de Oliveira, L. C., Lee, O., & Phelps, G. (2014). Proposing the knowledge base for teaching academic content to English language learners: Disciplinary linguistic knowledge. Teachers College Record, 116(3), 1–30.
Tweed, A. (2009). Designing effective science instruction. Arlington, VA: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning (McREL.
U.S. Department of Education (DOE). (2015). English learner toolkit for state and local education agencies (SEAs and LEAs). Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oela/english-learner-toolkit/index.html.
Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17–40.
Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., & Arguelles, M. E. (1997). The ABCDEs of co-teaching. Teaching Exceptional Children, 30(2), 4–10.
Villa, R. A., Thousand, J. S., & Nevin, A. I. (2013). A guide to co-teaching: New lessons and strategies to facilitate student learning (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Weiss, I. R., Pasley, J. D., Smith, P. S., Banilower, E., & Heck, D. (2003). Looking inside the classroom: A study of K-12Â mathematics and science education in the United States. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McDermott, C.L., Honigsfeld, A. (2017). Preparing Science Teachers for Project-Based, Integrated, Collaborative Instruction. In: de Oliveira, L., Campbell Wilcox, K. (eds) Teaching Science to English Language Learners. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53594-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53594-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53593-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53594-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)