Skip to main content

A Priori Knowledge in Learning Analytics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Learning Analytics: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends

Part of the book series: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control ((SSDC,volume 94))

Abstract

Learning Analytics (LA) can be data driven: the process is oriented essentially by data and not according to a theoretical background. In this case, results can be, sometimes, not exploitable. This is the reason why some LA processes are theory driven: based on A Priori Knowledge (APK), on a theoretical background. Here, we investigate the relationship between APK and LA. We propose a “2-level framework” that considers LA as a level 2 learning process and includes five components: stakeholders, goals, data, technical approaches and feedbacks. Based on this framework, a sample of LA related works is analyzed to exhibit how such works relate LA with APK. We show that most of the time the APK used for LA is the learning theory sustaining the student’s learning. However, it can be otherwise and, according to the goal of LA, it is sometimes fruitful to use another theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/JLA/issue/view/358.

Abbreviations

APK:

A Priori Knowledge

AT:

Activity Theory

BI:

Business Intelligence

EDM:

Educational Data Mining

ITS:

Intelligent Tutoring System

LA:

Learning Analytics

LMS:

Learning Management System

MOOC:

Massive Open Online Course

PLE:

Personal Learning Environments

SNA:

Social Network Analysis

TEL:

Technology Enhanced Learning

ZPD:

Zone of proximal development

References

  • Aleven V, Ashley K, Lynch C et al (2008) Intelligent tutoring systems for Ill-defined domains: assessment and feedback in Ill-defined domains. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on intelligent tutoring systems, Montreal, pp 23–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Anaya AR, Boticario JG, Letón E (2015) An approach of collaboration analytics in MOOCs using social network analysis and influence diagrams. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on educational data mining, Madrid, pp 492–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson M (1992) Intelligence and development: a cognitive theory. Blackwell, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson T, Dron J (2012) Learning technology through three generations of technology enhanced distance education pedagogy. Eur J Open Distance E-Learn 15

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristizabal A (2016) An epistemological approach for research in educational data mining. Int J Educ Res 4:131–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold KE, Pistilli MD (2012) Course signals at Purdue: using learning analytics to increase student success. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 267–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkisson M, Wiley D (2011) Learning analytics as interpretive practice: applying Westerman to educational intervention. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 117–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Attwell G (2007) Personal learning environments-the future of eLearning? Elearning Papers 2:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakharia A, Dawson S (2011) SNAPP: a bird’s-eye view of temporal participant interaction. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 168–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Balacheff N, Ludvigsen S, De Jong T, Lazonder A, Barnes S-A, Montandon L (2009) Technology-enhanced learning. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Berland M, Baker RS, Blikstein P (2014) Educational data mining and learning analytics: applications to constructionist research. Technol Knowl Learn 19:205–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blikstein P (2011) Using learning analytics to assess students’ behavior in open-ended programming tasks. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 110–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Blikstein P (2013) Multimodal learning analytics. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 102–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom BS, Engelhart MD, Furst EJ et al (1956) Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. David McKay Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdeau J, Grandbastien M (2010) Modeling tutoring knowledge. In: Advances in intelligent tutoring systems. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 123–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks C, Greer J, Gutwin C (2012) Using an instructional expert to mediate the locus of control in adaptive e-learning systems. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 84–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner JS, Austin GA (1986) A study of thinking. Transaction Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusilovsky P, Millán E (2007) User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. In: The adaptive web. Springer, pp 3–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Cen H, Koedinger KR, Junker B (2007) Is over practice necessary?-Improving learning efficiency with the cognitive tutor through educational data mining. Front Artif Intell Appl 158, 511

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatti MA, Dyckhoff AL, Schroeder U et al (2012) A reference model for learning analytics. Int J Technol Enhanced Learn 4:318–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Chiang RH, Storey VC (2012) Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS Q 36:1165–1188

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi MT, Roy M, Hausmann RG (2008) Observing tutorial dialogues collaboratively: insights about human tutoring effectiveness from vicarious learning. Cogn Sci 32:301–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clow D (2012) The learning analytics cycle: closing the loop effectively. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 134–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Clow D (2013) MOOCs and the funnel of participation. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 185–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper A (2012) A framework of characteristics for analytics. CETIS Analytics Ser 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson S, Mirriahi N, Gasevic D (2015) Importance of theory in learning analytics in formal and workplace settings. J Learn Analytics 2:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Liddo A, Shum SB, Quinto I et al (2011) Discourse-centric learning analytics. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 23–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Demchenko Y, De Laat C, Membrey P (2014) Defining architecture components of the big data ecosystem. In: Proceeding of international conference on collaboration technologies and systems (CTS), 2014, IEEE, pp 104–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmarais MC, Baker RS (2012) A review of recent advances in learner and skill modeling in intelligent learning environments. User Model User-Adap Inter 22:9–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg P (2016) The evolution of research on digital education. Int J Artif Intell Educ, 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg P, Schneider D, Synteta P (2002) Virtual learning environments. In: 3rd Hellenic conference “Information & Communication Technologies in Education,” Kastaniotis editions, Greece, pp 3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Mello S, Olney A, Person N (2010) Mining collaborative patterns in tutorial dialogues. JEDM-J Educ Data Mining 2:2–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyckhoff AL, Zielke D, Bültmann M et al (2012) Design and implementation of a learning analytics toolkit for teachers. Educ Technol Soc 15:58–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström Y (2014) Learning by expanding. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson R (2012) Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. Int J Technol Enhanced Learn 4:304–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier H, Kop R, Sitlia H (2011) The value of learning analytics to networked learning on a personal learning environment. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 104–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier H, Kop R, Durand G (2014) Challenges to research in MOOCs. J Online Learn Teach 10:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagne RM (2013) Instructional technology: foundations. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gašević D, Dawson S, Rogers T et al (2016) Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: the effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success. Internet High Educ 28:68–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobert JD, Sao Pedro M, Raziuddin J et al (2013) From log files to assessment metrics: measuring students’ science inquiry skills using educational data mining. J Learn Sci 22:521–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greller W, Drachsler H (2012) Translating learning into numbers: a generic framework for learning analytics. Educ Technol Soc 15:42–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt J (2015) Commentary on “distributed revisiting: an analytic for retention of coherent science learning”. J Learn Analytics 2:102–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joksimović S, Dowell N, Skrypnyk O et al (2015) How do you connect?: analysis of social capital accumulation in connectivist MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 64–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay J, Reimann P, Diebold E et al (2013) MOOCs: so many learners, so much potential… IEEE Intell Syst, 70–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly N, Thompson K, Yeoman P (2015) Theory-led design of instruments and representations in learning analytics: developing a novel tool for orchestration of online collaborative learning. J Learn Analytics 2:14–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy G, Ioannou I, Zhou Y et al (2013) Mining interactions in immersive learning environments for real-time student feedback. Australas J Educ Technol 29:172–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalil M, Ebner M (2015) Learning analytics: principles and constraints. In: Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications, pp 1326–1336

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight S, Shum SB, Littleton K (2014) Epistemology, assessment, pedagogy: where learning meets analytics in the middle space. J Learn Analytics 1:23–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kop R, Carroll F (2011) Cloud computing and creativity: learning on a massive open online course. Eur J Open Distance E-Learn 14

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee HS, Gweon GH, Dorsey C et al (2015) How does Bayesian knowledge tracing model emergence of knowledge about a mechanical system? In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 171–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Li N, Matsuda N, Cohen WW et al (2015) Integrating representation learning and skill learning in a human-like intelligent agent. Artif Intell 219:67–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Nashashibi F (2011) Robust real-time lane detection based on lane mark segment features and general a priori knowledge. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics (ROBIO). Springer, Heidelberg, pp 812–817

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren R, Johnson-Glenberg M (2013) Emboldened by embodiment six precepts for research on embodied learning and mixed reality. Educ Researcher 42:445–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liyanagunawardena TR, Adams AA, Williams SA (2013) MOOCs: a systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn 14:202–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockyer L, Heathcote E, Dawson S (2013) Informing pedagogical action: aligning learning analytics with learning design. Am Behav Sci 57(10):1439–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnisalis I, Demetriadis S, Karakostas A (2011) Adaptive and intelligent systems for collaborative learning support: a review of the field. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 4:5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Maldonado R, Pardo A, Mirriahi N et al (2015) The LATUX workflow: designing and deploying awareness tools in technology-enabled learning settings. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazoue JG (2014) The MOOC model: challenging traditional education. Educause Rev 47:25–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehaffy GL (2012) Challenge and change. Educause Rev 47:25–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Merceron A, Blikstein P, Siemens G (2015) Learning analytics: from big data to meaningful data. J Learn Analytics 4–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Mislevy RJ, Behrens JT, Dicerbo KE et al (2012) Design and discovery in educational assessment: evidence-centered design, psychometrics, and educational data mining. JEDM-J Educ Data Min 4:11–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto YR, Coleman CA, Williams JJ et al (2015) Beyond time-on-task: the relationship between spaced study and certification in MOOCs. J Learn Analytics 2:47–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olney AM, D’Mello S, Person N et al (2012) Guru: a computer tutor that models expert human tutors. In: Intelligent tutoring systems. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 256–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert S (1980) Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardos ZA (2015) Commentary on “Beyond time-on-task: the relationship between spaced study and certification in MOOCs”. J Learn Analytics 2:70–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perera D, Kay J, Koprinska I et al (2009) Clustering and sequential pattern mining of online collaborative learning data. IEEE Trans Knowledge Data Eng 21:759–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J (1950) Introduction à l’épistémologie génétique. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkwart N (2016) Another 25 years of AIED? Challenges and opportunities for intelligent educational technologies of the future. Int J Artificial Intell Educ 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajendran R, Iyer S, Murthy S et al (2013) A theory-driven approach to predict frustration in an ITS. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 6:378–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roll I, Aleven V, Koedinger KR (2010) The invention lab: using a hybrid of model tracing and constraint-based modeling to offer intelligent support in inquiry environments. In: Intelligent tutoring systems. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 115–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero C, Ventura S (2010) Educational data mining: a review of the state of the art. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 40:601–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp A, Levy R, Dicerbo KE et al (2012) Putting ECD into practice: the interplay of theory and data in evidence models within a digital learning environment. JEDM-J Educ Data Min 4:49–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Sao Pedro MA, Baker RS, Gobert JD (2012) Improving construct validity yields better models of systematic inquiry, even with less information. In: User modeling, adaptation, and personalization. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 249–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Scaife M, Rogers Y, Aldrich F et al (1997) Designing for or designing with? Informant design for interactive learning environments. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, pp 343–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider B, Pea R (2015) Does seeing one another’s gaze affect group dialogue? A computational approach. J Learn Analytics 2:107–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott J (1988) Social network analysis. Sociology 22:109–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serres M (2007) Les nouvelles technologies: La révolution culturelle et cognitive. In: Proceeding of 40 ans de l’INRIA, Interstices

    Google Scholar 

  • Shum SB, Ferguson R (2012) Social learning analytics. Educ Technol Soc 15:3–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens G (2005) Connectivism: a learning theory for the digital age. Int J Instr Technol Distance Learn 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon J (2014) Data preprocessing according to activity theory. In: European conference on data mining proceedings, Lisbon, Portugal, pp 245–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon J (2015) Digital tablets: a Trojan virus for ICT in education? In: Proceedings of the Asian conference on technology in the classroom 2015, Kobe, Japan, pp 111–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner BF (2011) About behaviorism. Vintage

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner CM, Kickmeier-Rust MD, Albert D (2014) Learning analytics and educational data mining: an overview of recent techniques. Learn Analytics Serious Game 6

    Google Scholar 

  • Svihla V, Wester MJ, Linn MC (2015) Distributed revisiting: an analytic for retention of coherent science learning. J Learn Analytics 2:75–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swenson J (2014) Establishing an ethical literacy for learning analytics. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 246–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempelaar DT, Heck A, Cuypers H et al (2013) Formative assessment and learning analytics. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 205–209

    Google Scholar 

  • van Harmelen M, Workman D (2012) Analytics for learning and teaching. CETIS Analytics Ser 1:1–40

    Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen A (2015) Learning analytics to support teachers during synchronous CSCL: balancing between overview and overload. J Learn Analytics 2:138–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky LS (1986) Thought and language, Rev ed. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson WR, Watson SL (2007) What are learning management systems, what are they not, and what should they become. TechTrends 51(2):28–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise AF (2014) Designing pedagogical interventions to support student use of learning analytics. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 203–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise AF, Shaffer DW (2015) Why theory matters more than ever in the age of big data. J Learn Analytics 2:5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise AF, Zha Y, Hausknecht SN (2013) Learning analytics for online discussions: a pedagogical model for intervention with embedded and extracted analytics. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 48–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Worsley M, Blikstein P (2011) What’s an expert? Using learning analytics to identify emergent markers of expertise through automated speech, sentiment and sketch analysis. In: EDM, pp 235–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Worsley M, Blikstein P (2013) Towards the development of multimodal action based assessment. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 94–101

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean Simon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simon, J. (2017). A Priori Knowledge in Learning Analytics. In: Peña-Ayala, A. (eds) Learning Analytics: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 94. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52977-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52977-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52976-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52977-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics