Abstract
Learning Analytics (LA) can be data driven: the process is oriented essentially by data and not according to a theoretical background. In this case, results can be, sometimes, not exploitable. This is the reason why some LA processes are theory driven: based on A Priori Knowledge (APK), on a theoretical background. Here, we investigate the relationship between APK and LA. We propose a “2-level framework” that considers LA as a level 2 learning process and includes five components: stakeholders, goals, data, technical approaches and feedbacks. Based on this framework, a sample of LA related works is analyzed to exhibit how such works relate LA with APK. We show that most of the time the APK used for LA is the learning theory sustaining the student’s learning. However, it can be otherwise and, according to the goal of LA, it is sometimes fruitful to use another theory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- APK:
-
A Priori Knowledge
- AT:
-
Activity Theory
- BI:
-
Business Intelligence
- EDM:
-
Educational Data Mining
- ITS:
-
Intelligent Tutoring System
- LA:
-
Learning Analytics
- LMS:
-
Learning Management System
- MOOC:
-
Massive Open Online Course
- PLE:
-
Personal Learning Environments
- SNA:
-
Social Network Analysis
- TEL:
-
Technology Enhanced Learning
- ZPD:
-
Zone of proximal development
References
Aleven V, Ashley K, Lynch C et al (2008) Intelligent tutoring systems for Ill-defined domains: assessment and feedback in Ill-defined domains. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on intelligent tutoring systems, Montreal, pp 23–27
Anaya AR, Boticario JG, Letón E (2015) An approach of collaboration analytics in MOOCs using social network analysis and influence diagrams. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on educational data mining, Madrid, pp 492–496
Anderson M (1992) Intelligence and development: a cognitive theory. Blackwell, London
Anderson T, Dron J (2012) Learning technology through three generations of technology enhanced distance education pedagogy. Eur J Open Distance E-Learn 15
Aristizabal A (2016) An epistemological approach for research in educational data mining. Int J Educ Res 4:131–138
Arnold KE, Pistilli MD (2012) Course signals at Purdue: using learning analytics to increase student success. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 267–270
Atkisson M, Wiley D (2011) Learning analytics as interpretive practice: applying Westerman to educational intervention. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 117–121
Attwell G (2007) Personal learning environments-the future of eLearning? Elearning Papers 2:1–8
Bakharia A, Dawson S (2011) SNAPP: a bird’s-eye view of temporal participant interaction. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 168–173
Balacheff N, Ludvigsen S, De Jong T, Lazonder A, Barnes S-A, Montandon L (2009) Technology-enhanced learning. Springer
Berland M, Baker RS, Blikstein P (2014) Educational data mining and learning analytics: applications to constructionist research. Technol Knowl Learn 19:205–220
Blikstein P (2011) Using learning analytics to assess students’ behavior in open-ended programming tasks. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 110–116
Blikstein P (2013) Multimodal learning analytics. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 102–106
Bloom BS, Engelhart MD, Furst EJ et al (1956) Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. David McKay Company, New York
Bourdeau J, Grandbastien M (2010) Modeling tutoring knowledge. In: Advances in intelligent tutoring systems. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 123–143
Brooks C, Greer J, Gutwin C (2012) Using an instructional expert to mediate the locus of control in adaptive e-learning systems. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 84–87
Bruner JS, Austin GA (1986) A study of thinking. Transaction Publishers
Brusilovsky P, Millán E (2007) User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. In: The adaptive web. Springer, pp 3–53
Cen H, Koedinger KR, Junker B (2007) Is over practice necessary?-Improving learning efficiency with the cognitive tutor through educational data mining. Front Artif Intell Appl 158, 511
Chatti MA, Dyckhoff AL, Schroeder U et al (2012) A reference model for learning analytics. Int J Technol Enhanced Learn 4:318–331
Chen H, Chiang RH, Storey VC (2012) Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS Q 36:1165–1188
Chi MT, Roy M, Hausmann RG (2008) Observing tutorial dialogues collaboratively: insights about human tutoring effectiveness from vicarious learning. Cogn Sci 32:301–341
Clow D (2012) The learning analytics cycle: closing the loop effectively. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 134–138
Clow D (2013) MOOCs and the funnel of participation. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 185–189
Cooper A (2012) A framework of characteristics for analytics. CETIS Analytics Ser 1
Dawson S, Mirriahi N, Gasevic D (2015) Importance of theory in learning analytics in formal and workplace settings. J Learn Analytics 2:1–4
De Liddo A, Shum SB, Quinto I et al (2011) Discourse-centric learning analytics. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 23–33
Demchenko Y, De Laat C, Membrey P (2014) Defining architecture components of the big data ecosystem. In: Proceeding of international conference on collaboration technologies and systems (CTS), 2014, IEEE, pp 104–112
Desmarais MC, Baker RS (2012) A review of recent advances in learner and skill modeling in intelligent learning environments. User Model User-Adap Inter 22:9–38
Dillenbourg P (2016) The evolution of research on digital education. Int J Artif Intell Educ, 1–17
Dillenbourg P, Schneider D, Synteta P (2002) Virtual learning environments. In: 3rd Hellenic conference “Information & Communication Technologies in Education,” Kastaniotis editions, Greece, pp 3–18
D’Mello S, Olney A, Person N (2010) Mining collaborative patterns in tutorial dialogues. JEDM-J Educ Data Mining 2:2–37
Dyckhoff AL, Zielke D, Bültmann M et al (2012) Design and implementation of a learning analytics toolkit for teachers. Educ Technol Soc 15:58–76
Engeström Y (2014) Learning by expanding. Cambridge University Press
Ferguson R (2012) Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. Int J Technol Enhanced Learn 4:304–317
Fournier H, Kop R, Sitlia H (2011) The value of learning analytics to networked learning on a personal learning environment. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 104–109
Fournier H, Kop R, Durand G (2014) Challenges to research in MOOCs. J Online Learn Teach 10:1
Gagne RM (2013) Instructional technology: foundations. Routledge, London
Gašević D, Dawson S, Rogers T et al (2016) Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: the effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success. Internet High Educ 28:68–84
Gobert JD, Sao Pedro M, Raziuddin J et al (2013) From log files to assessment metrics: measuring students’ science inquiry skills using educational data mining. J Learn Sci 22:521–563
Greller W, Drachsler H (2012) Translating learning into numbers: a generic framework for learning analytics. Educ Technol Soc 15:42–57
Hewitt J (2015) Commentary on “distributed revisiting: an analytic for retention of coherent science learning”. J Learn Analytics 2:102–106
Joksimović S, Dowell N, Skrypnyk O et al (2015) How do you connect?: analysis of social capital accumulation in connectivist MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 64–68
Kay J, Reimann P, Diebold E et al (2013) MOOCs: so many learners, so much potential… IEEE Intell Syst, 70–77
Kelly N, Thompson K, Yeoman P (2015) Theory-led design of instruments and representations in learning analytics: developing a novel tool for orchestration of online collaborative learning. J Learn Analytics 2:14–43
Kennedy G, Ioannou I, Zhou Y et al (2013) Mining interactions in immersive learning environments for real-time student feedback. Australas J Educ Technol 29:172–183
Khalil M, Ebner M (2015) Learning analytics: principles and constraints. In: Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications, pp 1326–1336
Knight S, Shum SB, Littleton K (2014) Epistemology, assessment, pedagogy: where learning meets analytics in the middle space. J Learn Analytics 1:23–47
Kop R, Carroll F (2011) Cloud computing and creativity: learning on a massive open online course. Eur J Open Distance E-Learn 14
Lee HS, Gweon GH, Dorsey C et al (2015) How does Bayesian knowledge tracing model emergence of knowledge about a mechanical system? In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 171–175
Li N, Matsuda N, Cohen WW et al (2015) Integrating representation learning and skill learning in a human-like intelligent agent. Artif Intell 219:67–91
Li H, Nashashibi F (2011) Robust real-time lane detection based on lane mark segment features and general a priori knowledge. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics (ROBIO). Springer, Heidelberg, pp 812–817
Lindgren R, Johnson-Glenberg M (2013) Emboldened by embodiment six precepts for research on embodied learning and mixed reality. Educ Researcher 42:445–452
Liyanagunawardena TR, Adams AA, Williams SA (2013) MOOCs: a systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn 14:202–227
Lockyer L, Heathcote E, Dawson S (2013) Informing pedagogical action: aligning learning analytics with learning design. Am Behav Sci 57(10):1439–1459
Magnisalis I, Demetriadis S, Karakostas A (2011) Adaptive and intelligent systems for collaborative learning support: a review of the field. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 4:5–20
Martinez-Maldonado R, Pardo A, Mirriahi N et al (2015) The LATUX workflow: designing and deploying awareness tools in technology-enabled learning settings. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 1–10
Mazoue JG (2014) The MOOC model: challenging traditional education. Educause Rev 47:25–42
Mehaffy GL (2012) Challenge and change. Educause Rev 47:25–42
Merceron A, Blikstein P, Siemens G (2015) Learning analytics: from big data to meaningful data. J Learn Analytics 4–8
Mislevy RJ, Behrens JT, Dicerbo KE et al (2012) Design and discovery in educational assessment: evidence-centered design, psychometrics, and educational data mining. JEDM-J Educ Data Min 4:11–48
Miyamoto YR, Coleman CA, Williams JJ et al (2015) Beyond time-on-task: the relationship between spaced study and certification in MOOCs. J Learn Analytics 2:47–69
Olney AM, D’Mello S, Person N et al (2012) Guru: a computer tutor that models expert human tutors. In: Intelligent tutoring systems. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 256–261
Papert S (1980) Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books
Pardos ZA (2015) Commentary on “Beyond time-on-task: the relationship between spaced study and certification in MOOCs”. J Learn Analytics 2:70–74
Perera D, Kay J, Koprinska I et al (2009) Clustering and sequential pattern mining of online collaborative learning data. IEEE Trans Knowledge Data Eng 21:759–772.
Piaget J (1950) Introduction à l’épistémologie génétique. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris
Pinkwart N (2016) Another 25 years of AIED? Challenges and opportunities for intelligent educational technologies of the future. Int J Artificial Intell Educ 1–13
Rajendran R, Iyer S, Murthy S et al (2013) A theory-driven approach to predict frustration in an ITS. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 6:378–388
Roll I, Aleven V, Koedinger KR (2010) The invention lab: using a hybrid of model tracing and constraint-based modeling to offer intelligent support in inquiry environments. In: Intelligent tutoring systems. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 115–124
Romero C, Ventura S (2010) Educational data mining: a review of the state of the art. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 40:601–618
Rupp A, Levy R, Dicerbo KE et al (2012) Putting ECD into practice: the interplay of theory and data in evidence models within a digital learning environment. JEDM-J Educ Data Min 4:49–110
Sao Pedro MA, Baker RS, Gobert JD (2012) Improving construct validity yields better models of systematic inquiry, even with less information. In: User modeling, adaptation, and personalization. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 249–260
Scaife M, Rogers Y, Aldrich F et al (1997) Designing for or designing with? Informant design for interactive learning environments. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, pp 343–350
Schneider B, Pea R (2015) Does seeing one another’s gaze affect group dialogue? A computational approach. J Learn Analytics 2:107–133
Scott J (1988) Social network analysis. Sociology 22:109–127
Serres M (2007) Les nouvelles technologies: La révolution culturelle et cognitive. In: Proceeding of 40 ans de l’INRIA, Interstices
Shum SB, Ferguson R (2012) Social learning analytics. Educ Technol Soc 15:3–26
Siemens G (2005) Connectivism: a learning theory for the digital age. Int J Instr Technol Distance Learn 2
Simon J (2014) Data preprocessing according to activity theory. In: European conference on data mining proceedings, Lisbon, Portugal, pp 245–249
Simon J (2015) Digital tablets: a Trojan virus for ICT in education? In: Proceedings of the Asian conference on technology in the classroom 2015, Kobe, Japan, pp 111–122
Skinner BF (2011) About behaviorism. Vintage
Steiner CM, Kickmeier-Rust MD, Albert D (2014) Learning analytics and educational data mining: an overview of recent techniques. Learn Analytics Serious Game 6
Svihla V, Wester MJ, Linn MC (2015) Distributed revisiting: an analytic for retention of coherent science learning. J Learn Analytics 2:75–101
Swenson J (2014) Establishing an ethical literacy for learning analytics. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 246–250
Tempelaar DT, Heck A, Cuypers H et al (2013) Formative assessment and learning analytics. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 205–209
van Harmelen M, Workman D (2012) Analytics for learning and teaching. CETIS Analytics Ser 1:1–40
van Leeuwen A (2015) Learning analytics to support teachers during synchronous CSCL: balancing between overview and overload. J Learn Analytics 2:138–162
Vygotsky LS (1986) Thought and language, Rev ed. MIT Press, Cambridge
Watson WR, Watson SL (2007) What are learning management systems, what are they not, and what should they become. TechTrends 51(2):28–34
Wise AF (2014) Designing pedagogical interventions to support student use of learning analytics. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 203–211
Wise AF, Shaffer DW (2015) Why theory matters more than ever in the age of big data. J Learn Analytics 2:5–13
Wise AF, Zha Y, Hausknecht SN (2013) Learning analytics for online discussions: a pedagogical model for intervention with embedded and extracted analytics. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 48–56
Worsley M, Blikstein P (2011) What’s an expert? Using learning analytics to identify emergent markers of expertise through automated speech, sentiment and sketch analysis. In: EDM, pp 235–240
Worsley M, Blikstein P (2013) Towards the development of multimodal action based assessment. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ACM, New York, pp 94–101
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Simon, J. (2017). A Priori Knowledge in Learning Analytics. In: Peña-Ayala, A. (eds) Learning Analytics: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 94. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52977-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52977-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52976-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52977-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)