Skip to main content

Towards the Concept of Background/baseline Compositions: A Practicable Path?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Compositional Data Analysis (CoDaWork 2015)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 187))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1199 Accesses

Abstract

Water geochemistry is often investigated considering a large number of variables, including major, minor and trace elements. Some of these are usually well associated due to coherent geochemical behaviour, but the effect of anthropic factors tends to increase data variability, sometimes obscuring the natural laws governing their relationships. It may thus be difficult to identify geochemical features linked to natural phenomena, as well as to separate geogenic anomalies from the anthropogenic ones, or to define background or baseline concentrations for single chemical elements. This is particularly true at regional level, where numerous phenomena may interact and mix together, forming a complex pattern not easy to interpret. The identification of background or baseline values is particularly difficult due to the compositional nature of chemical variables, so that under the Compositional Data Analysis (CoDA) theory single background or baseline values lose their meaning. However, they are fundamental references for public institutions and government policies. In this contribution a new approach is proposed, aimed at investigating the regionalised structure of the geochemical data by considering the joint behaviour of several chemical elements. The approach is based on the robust CoDA theory, so that the proportionality features of abundance data are fully taken into account, enhancing their relative multivariate behaviour, as well as the influence of outliers. An application example is presented for the groundwater compositions in Tuscany Region, a surface of about 23,000 km\(^2\), where more than 6000 wells have been sampled and analysed. The mapping of robust Mahalanobis distance was able to indicate (1) in which part of the investigated area the pressure toward anomalous behaviour was higher, (2) where the compositions nearest to the barycentre were and (3) if spatial continuity was present in limited portions of the territory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Part of Consorzio LaMMA, http://www.lamma.rete.toscana.it.

References

  1. Agterberg, F.P.: Geomathematics: Theoretical Foundations, Applications and Future Developments.Springer Series in Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, vol. 18 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agterberg, F.P.: Mixtures of multiplicative cascade models in geochemistry. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 14, 201–209 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aitchison, J.: The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data (Reprinted in 2003 by The Blackburn Press), p. 416. Chapman & Hall Ltd., London (UK) (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aitchison, J.: The statistical analysis of compositional data (with discussion). J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B-Stat. Methodol. 44(2), 139–177 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buccianti, A., Egozcue, J.J., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V.: Variation diagrams to statistically model the behaviour of geochemical variables: theory and applications. J. Hydrol. 519(PA), 988–998 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buccianti, A., Magli, R.: Metric concepts and implications in describing compositional changes for world rivers water chemistry. Comput. Geosci. 37(5), 670–676 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buccianti, A.: Is compositional data analysis a way to see beyond the illusion?. Comput. Geosci. 50, 165–173 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Buccianti, A., Gallo, M.: Weighted principal component analysis for compositional data: application example for the water chemistry of the Arno river (Tuscany, central Italy). Environmetrics 24, 269–277 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Buccianti, A., Grunsky, E.: Compositional data analysis in geochemistry: are we sure to see what really occurs during natural processes? J. Geochem. Explor. 14, 1–5 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carmignani L., Conti P., Cornamusini G., Meccheri M.: The internal northern Apennines, the northern tyrrhenian sea and the Sardinia-Corsica block. In: Geology of Italy. Italian Geological Society Bulletin IGC32 Florence-2004, pp. 59–77 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Daszykowski, M., Kaczmarek, K., Vander Heyden, Y., Walczak, B.: Robust statistic in data analysis. A review. Basic concept. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 85, 203–219 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. De Caritat, P., Grunsky, E.: Defining element associations and inferring geological processes from total element concentrations in Australia catchment outlet sediments: Multivariate analysis of continental-scale geochemical data. Appl. Geochem. 33, 104–126 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Egozcue, J.J., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V.: Simplicial geometry for compositional data. In: Buccianti, A., Mateu-Figueras, G., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V. (eds.) Compositional Data Analysis in the Geosciences: From Theory to Practice. Special Publication, vol. 264, pp. 12–28. Geological Society, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Egozcue, J.J., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V.: Groups of parts and their balances in compositional data analysis. Math. Geol. 37(7), 795–828 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Egozcue, J.J., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., Mateu-Figueras, G., Barcelo-Vidal, C.: Isometric logratio transformations for compositional data analysis. Math. Geol. 35(3), 279–300 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Filzmoser, P., Hron, K., Reimann, C.: Interpretation of multivariate outliers for compositional data. Comput. Geosci. 39, 77–85 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Filzmoser, P., Hron, K.: Outlier detection for compositional data using robust methods. Math. Geosci. 40(3), 233–248 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Filzmoser, P., Hron, K., Reimann, C.: Univariate statistical analysis of environmental (compositional) data: problems and possibilities. Sci. Total Environ. 407, 6100–6108 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Filzmoser, P., Hron, K., Reimann, C.: Principal component analysis for compositional data with outliers. Environmetrics 20(6), 621–632 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Galuszka, A.: A review of geochemical background concepts and an example using data from Poland. Environ. Geol. 52, 861–870 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Garrett, R.G.: The chi-square plot: a tool for multivariate outlier recognition. J. Geochem. Explor. 32, 319–341 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Goncalves, M.A.: Characteriszation of geochemical distributions using multifractals models. Math. Geosci. 33, 41–61 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hunt, A.G., Ghanbarian, B., Skinner, T.E., Ewing, R.P.: Scaling of geochemical reaction rates via advective solute transport. Chaos 25(075403), 1–15 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kondepudi, D., Prigogine, I.: Modern Thermodynamics. From Heat Engines to Dissipative Structures. Wiley (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ma, T., Li, C., Lu, Z.: Estimating the average concentration of minor and trace elements in surficial sediments using fractal methods. J. Geochem. Explor. 139, 207–216 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Maronna, R.A., Zamar, R.H.: Robust multivariate estimates for highdimensional datasets. Technometrics 44, 307–317 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Matschullat, J., Ottenstein, R., Reimann, C.: Geochemical background can we calculate it? Environ. Earth Sci. 39(9), 990–1000 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nieto, P., Custodio, E., Manzano, M.: Baseline groundwater quality: a European approach. Environ. Sci. Policy 8, 399–409 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nisi, B., Buccianti, A., Raco, B., Battaglini, R.: Analysis of complex regional databases and their support in the identification of background/baseline compositional facies in groundwater investigation: developments and application examples. J. Geochem. Explor. 164, 3–17 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nordstrom, D.K.: Baseline and premining geochemical characterization of mined sites. Appl. Geochem. 57, 17–34 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0 (2015). http://www.R-project.org/

  32. Raco, B., Buccianti, A., Corongiu, M., Lavorini, G., Macera, P., Manetti, F., Mari, R., Masetti, G., Menichetti, S., Nisi, B., Protano, G., Romanelli, S.: The geochemical database of Tuscany Region (Italy). Ital. J. Groundwater AS12055, 007–018 (2015). doi:10.7343/AS-100-15-0127

  33. Reimann, C., Garrett, R.G.: Geochemical background concept and reality. Sci. Total Environ. 350, 12–27 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rousseeuw, P.J.: Least median of squares regression. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 79, 871–880 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. UN-Water: Annual report: Available via DIALOG. http://www.unwater.org (2011). Accessed 15 Jan 2016

  36. Verboven, S., Hubert, M.: LIBRA: a MATLAB libray for robust analysis. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 75, 127–136 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. West, L.J., Odling, N.E.: Groundwater. In: Holden, J. (ed.) Water Resources. An Integrated Approach. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  38. World Health Organisation (WHO): Our plane, our health. Report of WHO Commission on Health and Environment, Geneva, World Health Organisaton (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Xu, W., Du, S.: Information entropy evolution for groundwater flow system: a case study of artificial recharge in Shijiazhuang city, China. Entropy 16, 4408–4419 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was developed thanks to funds of the University of Florence (2014) and of Tuscany Region through the Geobasi project (2009–2014). Santiago Thio Fernandez de Henestrosa is thanked for the editing of the manuscript, Vera Pawlowsky-Glahn and an anonymous referee for their valuable suggestions, Elizabeth Hancock for the English language.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Buccianti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Buccianti, A., Nisi, B., Raco, B. (2016). Towards the Concept of Background/baseline Compositions: A Practicable Path?. In: Martín-Fernández, J., Thió-Henestrosa, S. (eds) Compositional Data Analysis. CoDaWork 2015. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 187. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44811-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics