Skip to main content

Oh, Didn’t Anyone Tell You? The Importance of Intra-Organizational Information Sharing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Information Sharing in Military Operations

Abstract

Informational justice, a component of organizational justice, measures how employees perceive the quality of information they receive about the organizational decisions that affect them. Informational justice has been shown to impact personnel outcomes, including performance and retention. This chapter examines perceptions of informational justice and their effect on key outcomes in survey data from 6503 Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) personnel. We found that informational justice was related to perceptions of organizational justice, organizational and unit leadership, career management, trust in the CAF, and psychological withdrawal. Mediational analyses indicated that perceptions of informational justice were related to commitment and leave intentions, even after controlling for other variables, such as perceptions of overall justice and satisfaction with leadership. Implications for information sharing within military organizations are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Given the discrepancies between the sample and the target population, the data were weighted to correct for the demographic differences between the sample of respondents and the target population. Consequently, means and percentages for the full sample (meant to represent the total population of Regular Force Canadian Forces personnel) are estimates of this population, and because they are weighted, they are not direct representations of the mean scores and percentages reported by the survey respondents. Analyses based on subgroups of respondents (e.g., rank comparisons) and inferential analyses (e.g., correlations) are not weighted to reflect the total target population. In these cases, the sample data are not estimates of the population, but rather represent the actual means and percentages reported by the survey respondents.

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, L. M., & Schminke, M. (2009). The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: A test of mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 491–500. doi:10.1037/a0013203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, M. C., Kacmar, K. M., Blakely, G. L., & Bucklew, N. S. (2008). Group cohesion as an enhancement to the justice–affective commitment relationship. Group and Organization Management, 33, 736–755. doi:10.1177/1059601108326797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational bias for performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2045–2068. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02690.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J.A. (2004). Les facteurs explicatifs de la rétention du personnel d’officiers au sen du Commandement aérien des Forces canadiennes. Unpublished master’s thesis, Université du Québec à Hull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43–55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandes, P., Dharwadkar, R., & Dean, J.W. (1999). Does organizational cynicism matter? Employee and supervisor perspectives on work outcomes. In Eastern Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings (pp. 150–153).

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute, Canadian Forces Leadership. (2005). Leadership in the Canadian Forces: Doctrine. Kingston: Canadian Defence Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute, Canadian Forces Leadership. (2007). Leadership in the Canadian Forces: Leading the institution. Kingston: Canadian Defence Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. S., Bernerth, J. B., Walter, F., & Holt, D. T. (2010). Organizational justice and individuals’ withdrawal: Unlocking the influence of emotional exhaustion. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 367–390. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00864.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.86.3.386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.86.3.425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., & Gilliland, S. W. (2007). The management of organizational justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 34–48. doi:10.5465/amp.2007.27895338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeConinck, J. B., & Johnson, J. T. (2009). The effects of perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and organizational justice on turnover among salespeople. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 29, 333–351. doi:10.2753/pss0885-3134290403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R. H., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organisational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500–507. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.71.3.500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L., & Barling, J. (2005). Organizational injustice and psychological strain. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 37, 250–261. doi:10.1037/h0087260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, I., & Gou, T. (2011a). Canadian Forces Retention Survey response rate analysis. Director General Military Personnel Research and Analysis Technical Note 2011-009. Defence Research and Development Canada, Ottawa, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, I., & Gou, T. (2011b). Sampling design for the Canadian Forces Retention Survey. Director General Military Personnel Research and Analysis Technical Note 2011-114. Defence Research and Development Canada, Ottawa, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12, 9–22. doi:10.2307/257990

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 561–568. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.75.6.667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1993a). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 79–103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1993b). Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 81–103. doi:10.1006/obhd.1993.1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ironson, G. H., Smith, P. C., Brannick, M. T., Gibson, W. M., & Paul, K. B. (1989). Construction of a job in general scale: A comparison of global, composite, and specific measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 193–200. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.2.193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kernan, M. C., & Hanges, P. J. (2002). Survivor reactions to reorganization: Antecedents and consequences of procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 916–928. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.87.5.916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H.-S. (2009). Examining the role of informational justice in the wake of downsizing from an organizational relationship management perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 297–312. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9964-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T. Y., & Leung, K. (2007). Forming and reacting to overall fairness: A cross-cultural comparison. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104, 83–95. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladebo, O., Awotunde, J., & Abdulsalam-Saghir, P. (2008). Coworkers’ and supervisor interactional justice: Correlates of extension personnel’s job satisfaction, distress and aggressive behaviour. Journal of Behavioural and Applied Management, 9, 206–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, H., & Rupp, D. E. (2005). The impact of justice climate and justice orientation on work outcomes: A cross-level multifoci framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 242–256. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loi, R., Yang, J., & Diefendorff, J. M. (2009). Four-factor justice and daily job satisfaction: A multilevel investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 770–781. doi:10.1037/a0015714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malatesta, R. M., & Byrne, Z. S. (1997). The impact of formal and interactional justice on organizational outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantler, J. (2006). Psychological withdrawal scale. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 738–748. doi:10.2307/1556364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538–551. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.78.4.538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osipow, S. H., & Spokane, A. R. (1983). A manual for measures of occupational stress, strain, and coping. Columbus, OH: Marathon Consulting Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paryonova, N. & Butler, A. (2012). The 2012 CF Retention Survey: Descriptive results. Director General Military Personnel Research and Analysis Contract Report 2013-008. Defence Research and Development Canada, Ottawa, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peddie, S.K. (2007). Functional and dysfunctional retention: The impact of trust on cynicism. Unpublished master’s thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roch, S. G., & Shanock, L. R. (2006). Organizational justice in an exchange framework: Clarifying organizational justice distinctions. Journal of Management, 32, 299–322. doi:10.1177/0149206305280115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1996). Maslach Burnout inventory—General survey. In C. Maslach, S. E. Jackson, & M.P. Leiter (Eds.), The Maslach Burnout inventory—Test manual (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P., Barclay, L. J., & Pugh, S. D. (2008). When explanations for layoffs are not enough: Employer’s integrity as a moderator of the relationship between informational justice and retaliation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, 123–146. doi:10.1348/096317907X206848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soeters, J.M.M.L. (2014). Information sharing in military (security, humanitarian, and intelligence) operations. Presented to the Armed Forces and Conflict Resolution Research Committee at the World Congress of the International Sociological Association, Yokohama, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stecher, M. D., & Rosse, J. G. (2005). The distributive side of interactional justice: The effects of interpersonal treatment on emotional arousal. Journal of Managerial Issues, 17, 229–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suurd, C. D. (2009). A test of the relationships among the justice facets, overall justice strain and turnover intent in military context. Unpublished master’s thesis, Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, B. J. (2001). Health consequences of organizational injustice: Tests of main and interactive effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 197–215. doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NH: L. Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurston, P. W., & McNall, L. (2010). Justice perceptions of performance appraisal practices. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25, 201–228. doi:10.1108/02683941011023712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Till, R. E., & Karren, R. (2010). Organizational justice perceptions and pay level satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26, 42–57. doi:10.1108/02683941111099619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Bies, R. J. (1990). Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In J. Carroll (Ed.), Applied social psychology and organizational settings (pp. 77–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villeneuve, M., Dobreva-Martinova, T., & Currie, J.G. (2004). Buying low attrition or building high retention? That is the question. Director Military Employment Policy—Attrition and Retention Team Report 2004–06. Defence Research and Development Canada, Ottawa, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woycheshin, D.E. (2007). Review of the Unit Morale Profile core measures. Director Military Personnel Operational Research and Analysis Technical Note 2007–11. Defence Research and Development Canada, Ottawa, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapata, C. P., Olsen, J. E., & Martins, L. L. (2013). Social exchange from the supervisor’s perspective: Employee trustworthiness as a predictor of interpersonal and informational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irina Goldenberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of National Defense

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goldenberg, I., Saindon, M., Al-Tawil, J. (2017). Oh, Didn’t Anyone Tell You? The Importance of Intra-Organizational Information Sharing. In: Goldenberg, I., Soeters, J., Dean, W. (eds) Information Sharing in Military Operations. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42819-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics