Skip to main content

The Impact of False and Nuisance Alarms on the Design Optimization of Physical Security Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors and System Interactions

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 497))

  • 1058 Accesses

Abstract

Despite the known degrading impact of high nuisance and false alarm rates (NAR/FAR) on operator performance, analyses of security systems often ignores operator performance. We developed a model to analyze the impact of nuisance alarm rates on operator performance and on overall system performance. The model demonstrates that current methods that do not account for operator performance produce optimistic estimates of system performance. As shown in our model, even low NAR/FAR levels and the associated alarm queueing effect can increase operator detect and response time, which in turn reduces the amount of time the response force has to interrupt the intruder. An illustrative analysis shows that alarm processing times can be higher than the assessment time due to queue wait times and that systems with only one or two operators can become overwhelmed as NAR increases, decreasing system performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Duggan, R.A., Wood, B.J.: Red teaming of advanced information assurance concepts. In: Proceedings of DISCEX’00, pp. 112–118. IEEE (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Garcia, M.: The Design and Evaluation of Physical Protection Systems. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bennett, H.A.: The “EASI” Approach to Physical Security Evaluation (NUREG-760145). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Matter, J.C.: SAVI: A PC-Based Vulnerability Assessment Program (SAND88-1279). Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Winblad, A., Snell, M., Jordan, S.E., Key, B., Bingham, B., Walker, S.: The ASSESS outsider analysis module (SAND89-1602C). In: 30th Annual Meeting of INMM, pp. 420–425 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Moray, N., Inagaki, T., Itoh, M.: Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time-critical tasks. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 6(1), 44–58 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bliss, J.P.: An Investigation of alarm related incidents and incidents in aviation. Int. J. Aviat. Psych. 13(3), 249–268 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Breznitz, S.: Cry Wolf: The Psychology of False Alarms. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bliss, J.P., Dunn, M.C.: Behavioural implications of alarm mistrust as a function of task workload. Ergonomics 43(9), 1283–1300 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bliss, J.P., Gilson, R.D., Deaton, J.E.: Human probability matching behavior in response to alarms of varying reliability. Ergonomics 38(11), 2300–2312 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sorkin, R.D.: Why are people turning off our alarms? J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84(3), 1107–1108 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xiao, Y., Seagull, F.J., Nieves-Khouw, F., Barczak, N., Perkins, S.: Organizational-historical analysis of the “failure to respond to alarm” problems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Hum. 34(6), 772–778 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brown, N.J.K., Jones, K.A., Nozick, L.K., Xu, N.: Multi-layered security investment optimization using a simulation embedded within a genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of 2015 WinterSim, pp. 2424–2435. IEEE Press (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gans, N., Koole, G., Mandelbaum, A.: Telephone call centers: tutorial, review, and research prospects. Manuf. Service Oper. Manage. 5(2), 79–141 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bransby, M.L., Jenkinson, J.: The management of alarm systems: a review of current practice in the procurement, design and management of alarm systems in the chemical and power industries. Health and Safety Executive Research Report CRR 166 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dixon, S.R., Wickens, C.D., Chang, D.: Unmanned aerial vehicle flight control: false alarms versus misses. In: Proceedings of HFES, pp. 152–156. SAGE Publications (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bustamante, E.A., Bliss, J.P., Anderson, B.L.: Effects of varying the threshold of alarm systems and workload on human performance. Ergonomics 50(7), 1127–1147 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chancey, E.T., Bliss, J.P., Proaps, A.B., Madhavan, P.: The role of trust as a mediator between system characteristics and response behaviors. Hum. Factors 57(6), 947–958 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. EEMUA: Alarm Systems: A Guide to Design, Management and Procurement (3rd edn.). Publication 191. The Engineering and Materials Users Association, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. ISA: ANSI/ISA-18.2-2009 Management of Alarm Systems for the Process Industries. International Society of Automation, Research Triangle Park (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dixon, S.R., Wickens, C.D., McCarley, J.S.: On the independence of compliance and reliance: are automation false alarms worse than misses? Hum. Factors 49(4), 564–572 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank John L. Russell and Judi See of Sandia National Laboratories. Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. SAND2016-2179 C

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alisa Bandlow .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bandlow, A., Jones, K.A., Brown, N.J.K., Nozick, L.K. (2017). The Impact of False and Nuisance Alarms on the Design Optimization of Physical Security Systems. In: Nunes, I. (eds) Advances in Human Factors and System Interactions. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 497. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41956-5_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41956-5_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41955-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41956-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics