Abstract
Despite the known degrading impact of high nuisance and false alarm rates (NAR/FAR) on operator performance, analyses of security systems often ignores operator performance. We developed a model to analyze the impact of nuisance alarm rates on operator performance and on overall system performance. The model demonstrates that current methods that do not account for operator performance produce optimistic estimates of system performance. As shown in our model, even low NAR/FAR levels and the associated alarm queueing effect can increase operator detect and response time, which in turn reduces the amount of time the response force has to interrupt the intruder. An illustrative analysis shows that alarm processing times can be higher than the assessment time due to queue wait times and that systems with only one or two operators can become overwhelmed as NAR increases, decreasing system performance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Duggan, R.A., Wood, B.J.: Red teaming of advanced information assurance concepts. In: Proceedings of DISCEX’00, pp. 112–118. IEEE (2000)
Garcia, M.: The Design and Evaluation of Physical Protection Systems. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2007)
Bennett, H.A.: The “EASI” Approach to Physical Security Evaluation (NUREG-760145). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C (1977)
Matter, J.C.: SAVI: A PC-Based Vulnerability Assessment Program (SAND88-1279). Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque (1988)
Winblad, A., Snell, M., Jordan, S.E., Key, B., Bingham, B., Walker, S.: The ASSESS outsider analysis module (SAND89-1602C). In: 30th Annual Meeting of INMM, pp. 420–425 (1989)
Moray, N., Inagaki, T., Itoh, M.: Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time-critical tasks. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 6(1), 44–58 (2000)
Bliss, J.P.: An Investigation of alarm related incidents and incidents in aviation. Int. J. Aviat. Psych. 13(3), 249–268 (2003)
Breznitz, S.: Cry Wolf: The Psychology of False Alarms. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1984)
Bliss, J.P., Dunn, M.C.: Behavioural implications of alarm mistrust as a function of task workload. Ergonomics 43(9), 1283–1300 (2000)
Bliss, J.P., Gilson, R.D., Deaton, J.E.: Human probability matching behavior in response to alarms of varying reliability. Ergonomics 38(11), 2300–2312 (1995)
Sorkin, R.D.: Why are people turning off our alarms? J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84(3), 1107–1108 (1988)
Xiao, Y., Seagull, F.J., Nieves-Khouw, F., Barczak, N., Perkins, S.: Organizational-historical analysis of the “failure to respond to alarm” problems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Hum. 34(6), 772–778 (2004)
Brown, N.J.K., Jones, K.A., Nozick, L.K., Xu, N.: Multi-layered security investment optimization using a simulation embedded within a genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of 2015 WinterSim, pp. 2424–2435. IEEE Press (2015)
Gans, N., Koole, G., Mandelbaum, A.: Telephone call centers: tutorial, review, and research prospects. Manuf. Service Oper. Manage. 5(2), 79–141 (2003)
Bransby, M.L., Jenkinson, J.: The management of alarm systems: a review of current practice in the procurement, design and management of alarm systems in the chemical and power industries. Health and Safety Executive Research Report CRR 166 (1998)
Dixon, S.R., Wickens, C.D., Chang, D.: Unmanned aerial vehicle flight control: false alarms versus misses. In: Proceedings of HFES, pp. 152–156. SAGE Publications (2004)
Bustamante, E.A., Bliss, J.P., Anderson, B.L.: Effects of varying the threshold of alarm systems and workload on human performance. Ergonomics 50(7), 1127–1147 (2007)
Chancey, E.T., Bliss, J.P., Proaps, A.B., Madhavan, P.: The role of trust as a mediator between system characteristics and response behaviors. Hum. Factors 57(6), 947–958 (2015)
EEMUA: Alarm Systems: A Guide to Design, Management and Procurement (3rd edn.). Publication 191. The Engineering and Materials Users Association, London (2013)
ISA: ANSI/ISA-18.2-2009 Management of Alarm Systems for the Process Industries. International Society of Automation, Research Triangle Park (2009)
Dixon, S.R., Wickens, C.D., McCarley, J.S.: On the independence of compliance and reliance: are automation false alarms worse than misses? Hum. Factors 49(4), 564–572 (2007)
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank John L. Russell and Judi See of Sandia National Laboratories. Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. SAND2016-2179 C
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bandlow, A., Jones, K.A., Brown, N.J.K., Nozick, L.K. (2017). The Impact of False and Nuisance Alarms on the Design Optimization of Physical Security Systems. In: Nunes, I. (eds) Advances in Human Factors and System Interactions. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 497. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41956-5_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41956-5_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41955-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41956-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)