Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Workaholism and Individual Work Performance in Lithuanian and German Financial Sector Multinational Corporations: Differences Between Generations X and Y

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Intercultural Interactions in the Multicultural Workplace

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

Abstract

This chapter aims to clarify the differences between generations X and Y regarding workaholism and to compare the impact of workaholism on the task proficiency component of individual work performance in financial sector multinationals in Lithuania and German-speaking countries.

The work cultures often lionize hard work, so the impact of workaholism gets a high degree of attention. The discussion on the nature of workaholism, its causes and effects, its addiction like nature and typology is still being emphasized by both academia and practitioners. However, there is a lack of research on intergenerational differences in multinationals and their attitude towards workaholism.

The quantitative empirical research method was chosen. The questionnaire was formed using the validated workaholism questionnaire created by Spence and Robbins and the task proficiency questionnaire by Griffin et al. The workaholism type is defined by variations on employee work involvement, work enjoyment and feeling driven.

The data was collected from a self-reported on-line survey. 198 respondents from Lithuania-based and 99 respondents from Germany and Switzerland-based financial sector multinationals participated.

The research reveals differences between generations X and Y and between Lithuania and German-speaking financial sector multinationals. The findings show equal distribution of workaholics (70 %) and non-workaholics (30 %) in Lithuania and German-speaking countries. Regarding the intergenerational differences, the tendencies are the same. Both X and Y financial sector employees more often tend to be workaholics than non-workaholics. On the other hand, individual work performance differs by country (more highly evaluated by the Lithuanian sample), but not by generation or workaholism/non-workaholism attitudes. The findings suggest that high individual work performance is achieved by both generations X and Y as well as by workaholics and non-workaholics equally. However, individual work performance is positively related to work enjoyment.

The financial sector multinationals should focus on the dimension of work enjoyment instead of emphasizing intergenerational differences in the workplace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Borman WC, Motowidlo SJ (1993) Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In: Schmitt N, Borman WC (eds) Personnel selection. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 71–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Buelens M, Poelmans SAY (2004) Enriching the Spence and Robbins’ typology of workaholism: demographic, motivational and organizational correlates. J Organ Chang Manag 17(5):440–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke RJ (1999) Workaholism in organizations: gender Differences. Sex Roles J 41(5/6):333–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke RJ (2000) Workaholism and extra-work satisfactions. Int J Organ Anal 7(4):352–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke RJ (2001) Workaholism in organizations: the role of organizational values. Pers Rev 33(6):637–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke RJ, Burgess Z, Fallon B (2006) Workaholism among Australian female managers and professionals. Job behaviors, satisfactions and psychological health. Equal Oppor Int 25(3):200–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke RJ, Koyuncu M, Fiksenbaum L (2008) Workaholism, work and extra-work satisfactions and psychological well-being among professors in Turkey. Cross Cult Manag Int J 15(4):353–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JP (1983) Some possible implications of “modeling” for the conceptualization of measurement. In: Landy F, Zedeck S, Cleveland J (eds) Performance measurement and theory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, pp 277–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JP (1990) Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In: Dunnette MD, Hough LM (eds) Handbook of industrial and orgunizational psychology, vol 1(2). Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA, pp 687–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantarow E (1979) Women workaholics. Mother Jones 6:56–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Cennamo L, Gardner D (2008) Generational differences in work values, outcomes and person-organisation values fit. J Manag Psychol 23(8):891–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherrington DJ (1980) The work ethic. American Management Association, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark MA, Michel JS, Zhdanova L, Pui SY, Baltes BB (2014) All work and no play? A meta-analytic examination of the correlates and outcomes of workaholism. J Manag

    Google Scholar 

  • Crumpacker M, Crumpacker JD (2007) Succession planning and generational stereotypes: should HR consider age-based values and attitudes a relevant factor or a passing fad? Public Pers Manag 36(4):349–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalal RS, Lam H, Weiss HM, Welch EL, Hulin CL (2009) A within-person approach to work behavior and performance: concurrent and legged citizenship-counterproductivity associations, and dynamic relationships with affect and overall job performance. Acad Manag J 52(5):1051–1066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espinoza C, Ukleja M, Rusch C (2010) Managing the Millenials: discover the core competencies for managing today’s workforce. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher CD, Schoenfeldt LF, Shaw JB (2006) Human resource management, 6th edn. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Galperin B, Burke R (2006) Uncovering the relationship between workaholism and workplace destructive and constructive deviance: an exploratory study. Int J Hum Resour Manag 17:331–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göbel C, Zwick T (2011) Age and productivity: sector differences. De Economist 160:35–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorgievski MJ, Moriano JA, Bakker AB (2014) Relating work engagement and workaholism to entrepreneurial performance. J Manag Psychol 29(2):106–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin MA, Neal A, Parker SK (2007) A new model of new work role performance: positive behaviour in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Acad Manag J 50(2):327–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guion RM (1998) Assessment, measurement, and prediction for personnel selection. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Gursoy D, Maier TA, Chi CG (2008) Generational differences:an examination of work values and generational gaps in the hospitality workforce. Int J Hosp Manag 27:448–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harpaz I, Snir R (2003) Workaholism: its definition and nature. Hum Relat 56:291–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killinger B (1991) Workaholics: the respectable addicts. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans L, Bernaards C, Hildebrandt V, Buuren S, Beek AJ, Vet HCW (2012) Development of an individual work performance questionnaire. Int J Product Perform Manag 62(1):6–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupperschmidt B (2000) Multigeneration employees: strategies for effective management. Health Care Manag 19:65–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird MD, Harvey P, Lancaster J (2015) Accountability, entitlement, tenure, and satisfaction in Generation Y. J Manag Psychol 30(1):87–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy DV (2015) Effects of workaholism on satisfaction among US managerial and professional women. Gend Manag Int J 30(8):635–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liotta ACB (2012) Unlocking generational codes: understanding what makes the generations tick and what ticks them off. Aviva Publishing, Lake Placid

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlowitz M (1980) Workaholics: living with them, working with them. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan LHW, O’Driscoll MP, Burke RJ (2003) Workaholism: a review of theory, research, and future directions. In: Cooper CL, Robertson IT (eds) International review of industrial and organizational psychology, vol 18. Wiley, New York, pp 167–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Motowidlo SJ, Borman WC, Schmit MJ (1997) A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Hum Perform 10(2):71–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naughton TJ (1987) A conceptual view of workaholism and implications for career counseling and research. Career Dev Q 35:180–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neil S (2010) Leveraging generational work styles to meet business objectives. Inf Manag J 28–33, January/February, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates W (1971) Confessions of a workaholic: the facts about work addiction. World Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Osif BA (2008) Workaholism. Libr Adm Manag J 22(3):155–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel AS, Bowler MC, Bowler JL, Methe SA (2012) A meta-analysis of workaholism. Int J Bus Manag 7(11):2–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter G (1996) Organizational impact of workaholism. Suggestions for researching the negative outcomes of excessive work. J Occup Health Psychol 1:70–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuters (2013) German banking intern died of natural causes after working 72 hours straight: coroner. Retrieved from http://nydn.us/17PuITF. Accessed on 24 Jan 2016

  • Robinson BE (1999) The work addiction risk test: development of a tentative measure of workaholism. Percept Mot Skills 88:199–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson BE (2000) Workaholism: bridging the gap between workplace, sociocultural, and family research. J Employ Couns 37(1):31–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson BE (2007) Chained to the desk, 2nd edn. New York University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotundo M, Sackett PR (2002) The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: a policy-capturing approach. J Appl Psychol 87(1):66–80. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayers R (2007) The right staff from X to Y. Libr Manag 28(8/9):474–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli WB, Shimazu A, Taris TW (2009) Being driven to work excessively hard: the evaluation of a two-factor measure of workaholism in the Netherlands and Japan. Cross Cult Res 43(4):320–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoch T (2012) Turning a ship around with four-generation crew. Inf Manag J, July/August 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott KS, Moore KS, Miceli MP (1997) An exploration of the meaning and consequences of workaholism. Hum Relat 50(3):287–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smola KW, Sutton CD (2002) Generational differences: revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. J Organ Behav 32(4):363–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snir R, Harpaz I, Burke R (2006) Workaholism in organizations: new research directions. Career Dev Int 11(5):369–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence JT, Robbins AS (1992) Workaholism: definition, measurement, and preliminary results. J Pers Assess 58(1):160–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spruell G (1987) Work fever. Train Dev J 41:41–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Taris TW, Schaufeli WB, Verhoeven LC (2005) Workaholism in the Netherlands: measurement and implications for job strain and work–nonwork conflict. Appl Psychol Int Rev 54(1):37–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaitkevičius R, Saudargienė A (2006) Statistika su SPSS psichologiniuose tyrimuose. Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto leidykla, Kaunas

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswesvaran C (2011) Assessment of individual job performance: a review of the past century and a look ahead. Handbook of industrial. Work Organ Psychol 1:110–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingarten RM (2009) Four generations, one workplace: a Gen X-Y staff nurse’s view of team building in the emergency department. J Emerg Nurs 35:27–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerman JW, Yamamura JH (2007) Generational preferences for work environment fit: effects on employee outcomes. Career Dev Int 12(2):150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zopiatis A, Kapardis MK, Varnavas A (2012) Y-ers, X-ers and Boomers: investigating the multigeneralional (mis)perceptions in the hospitality workplace. Tour Hosp Res 12(2):101–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ISM University of Management and Economics, Vilnius, Lithuania

    Raimonda Alonderienė & Margarita Pilkienė

  2. Catholic University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt, Germany

    Juliane Fuchs

  3. Nordea Bank AB, Vilnius, Lithuania

    Miglė Pilkaitė

Authors
  1. Raimonda Alonderienė
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juliane Fuchs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Miglė Pilkaitė
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Margarita Pilkienė
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raimonda Alonderienė .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. WSB University in Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland

    Małgorzata Rozkwitalska

  2. Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Austria

    Łukasz Sułkowski

  3. Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Slawomir Magala

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alonderienė, R., Fuchs, J., Pilkaitė, M., Pilkienė, M. (2017). Workaholism and Individual Work Performance in Lithuanian and German Financial Sector Multinational Corporations: Differences Between Generations X and Y. In: Rozkwitalska, M., Sułkowski, Ł., Magala, S. (eds) Intercultural Interactions in the Multicultural Workplace. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39771-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation