Skip to main content

Classifications of the Rotator Cuff Tears

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rotator Cuff Tear

Abstract

Classifying a rotator cuff tear, defining its shape and size and the number of involved tendons, allows the etiology of the lesion and the biomechanical principles that cause a tear enlargement to be better understood. Classification also enables the surgeon to acquire data and to communicate clinical and functional results obtained with different treatments to the scientific community, in order to compare his or her data with those of other colleagues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ellman H (1990) Diagnosis and treatment of incomplete rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop 254:64–74

    Google Scholar 

  2. Codman EA, Akerson ID (1931) The pathology associated with rupture of the supraspinatus tendon. Ann Surg 93:348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wasilewski SA, Frankl U (1991) Rotator cuff pathology. Clin Orthop 267:65–70

    Google Scholar 

  4. DePalma AF (1950) Surgery of the shoulder. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, p 108

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lohr JF, Uhthoff HK (1987) The pathogenesis of degenerative rotator cuff tears. Orthop Trans 11:237

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yamanaka K, Fukuda H. Pathological studies of the supraspinatus tendon with reference to incomplete thickness tears. Proc 3rd international conference on surgery of the shoulder. Fukuoka, Oct 28–30, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gartsman GM (2003) Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. In: Shoulder arthroscopy. Elsevier, Philadelphia, p 193

    Google Scholar 

  8. Snyder SJ (2002) Arthroscopic classification of rotator cuff lesions and surgical decision making. In: Shoulder arthroscopy. Lippincott William & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 201–202

    Google Scholar 

  9. Habermeyer P, Krieter C, Tang KI, Lichtenberg S, Magosh P (2008) A new arthroscopic classification of articular-sided supraspinatus foot print lesions: a prospective comparison with Snyder’s and Elmman’s classification. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:909–913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Davidson J, Burkhart SS (2010) The geometric classification of rotator cuff tears: a system linking tear pattern to treatment and prognosis. Arthroscopy 26:417–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McLaughlin H (1944) Lesions of the musculotendinous cuff of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg 26:31–51

    Google Scholar 

  12. DePalma AF (1973) Surgical approaches and procedures. In: Surgery of the shoulder. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 229–234

    Google Scholar 

  13. DeOrio JK, Cofield RH (1984) Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:563–567

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Harryman DT, Mack LA, Wang K, Jackins SE, Richardson ML, Matsen FA (1991) Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:982–989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gerber C, Fuchs B, Hodler J (2000) The results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:505–515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Burkhart SS, Danaceau SM, Pearce CE (2001) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: analysis of results by tear size and by repair technique-margin convergence versus direct tendon-to-bone repair. Arthroscopy 17:905–912

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Davidson JF, Burkhart SS, Richardson DP, Campbell SE. Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging to predict rotator cuff tear pattern and method of repair. Arthroscopy 2005;21:1428.e1–1428.e10. Available online at www.arthroscopyjournal.org

  18. Burkhart SS, Athanasiou KA, Wirth MA (1996) Margin convergence: a method of reducing strain in massive rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 12:335–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lo IK, Burkhart SS (2004) Arthroscopic repair of massive, contracted, immobile rotator cuff tears using single and double interval slides: technique and preliminary results. Arthroscopy 20:22–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuhn JE, Dunn WR, Ma B, Wright RW, Jones G, Spencer EE, Wolf B, Holloway B (2007) Inter-observer agreement in the classification of rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med 35:437–441

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Gumina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gumina, S., Borroni, M. (2017). Classifications of the Rotator Cuff Tears. In: Gumina, S. (eds) Rotator Cuff Tear. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33355-7_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33355-7_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33354-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33355-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics