Abstract
Technology is on the brink of enabling fully autonomous unmanned aircraft system (UAS) operations that can supersede the role of humans in every respect. However, in the United States (USA), the regulatory structure for these aircraft remains in its nascent stage. The Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) current UAS regulations, based on the existing regulatory model applicable to manned aircraft, place the Remote Pilot in Charge (RPIC) as central actor in UAS operations, responsible for safety of flight. Specifically, the FAA requires the RPIC, unaided by technology, to “see and avoid” hazards and mitigate the potential of midair collisions. To the extent that humans become further, or even entirely, removed from UAS flight operations, autonomous UAS flight challenges both the letter and intent of this regulatory scheme. This chapter reviews current FAA regulations in light of anticipated technological advances and current research and development efforts and proposes regulatory suggestions and structural changes required to enable autonomous UAS flights in the US national airspace system (NAS) based on a new philosophical paradigm in which the RPIC is no longer central to flight safety.
To do this, Part I summarizes relevant UAS regulations relating to public and nonpublic UAS operational requirements and waivers thereto, as well as the rationale behind them. Part II identifies different types of technological advances necessary to mitigate concerns associated with UAS flight safety in general and as applicable to autonomous flight, such as first person view, traffic collision avoidance systems (T-CAS), and Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B). Part III discussed structural mitigation measures that will need to be taken into account, in parallel with those technical measures, using the National Aviation and Space Agency’s (NASA) unmanned traffic management (UTM) initiative as a baseline. Part IV discusses current research and development efforts relevant to enabling autonomous UAS operations in the NAS, with an emphasis on the FAA’s Pathfinder Program. Part V explores potential regulatory improvements that will be required once sufficient technological and structural developments exist. Part VI concludes by summarizing the regulatory and other changes necessary to enable safe, efficient, and effective autonomous UAS operations in the US NAS.
References
Amazon, Amazon Prime Air (2017), https://www.amazon.com/Amazon-Prime-Air/b?ie=UTF8&node=8037720011. Accessed 26 Feb 2017
BI Intelligence, UPS tests drone delivery system, Business Insider (2017), http://www.businessinsider.com/ups-tests-drone-delivery-system-2017-2. Accessed 26 Feb 2017
J. Christman, Autonomy in moral and political philosophy, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2015), https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/autonomy-moral/#ConAut
DJI, Inspire 1 (2017a), http://www.dji.com/inspire-1/info
DJI, Inspire 1 (2017b), http://www.dji.com/inspire-1/remote-controller#easy-control
FAA, Focus Area Pathfinder Program (2016), https://www.faa.gov/uas/programs_partnerships/focus_area_pathfinder/. Accessed 27 Jan 2017
FAA, Part 107 Waivers Granted (2017). https://www.faa.gov/uas/request_waiver/waivers_granted/. Accessed 26 Feb 2016
Google UAS Airspace System Overview (2017), https//ut.arc.nasa.gov/documents.html,
K. Kaplan, Disney makes history with First U.S. Light Show powered by 300 Intel Drones, IQ (2016), http://iq.intel.com/drone-light-show-takes-disney-world-visitors-future/. Accessed 26 Feb 2016
P. McCausland, S. Walters, Tesla’s “Autopilot” begins braking for wreck before driver, NBC News (2016), http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/tesla-autopilot-begins-braking-wreck-driver-n700941
Miele, Robot Vacuum Cleaner, https://www.mieleusa.com/domestic/robot-vacuum-cleaner-2750.htm
NASA Armstrong, NASA, FAA, Industry Conduct Initial Sense-and-Avoid Test (2015), https://www.nasa.gov/centers/armstrong/Features/acas_xu_paves_the_way.html
NASA UTM Fact Sheet., https://utm.arc.nasa.gov, (2017)
NHTSA, Automatic Emergency Braking, https://www.safercar.gov/Vehicle-Shoppers/Safety-Technology/AEB/aeb
G. Norris, NASA’s Traveler To Demo “Trustworthy” UAS Autonomy, Aviation Week Network (2016), http://aviationweek.com/commercial-aviation/nasa-s-traveler-demo-trustworthy-uas-autonomy
PrecisionHawk Signs UAV Research Agreement with FAA to Address Extended Visual Line of Sight, (2015), http://www.precisionhawk.com/media/topic/precisionhawk-faa-partnership/. Accessed 26 Feb 2017
Tesla, Autopilot (2017), https://www.tesla.com/autopilot
G. Turnbull, The realities of autonomy in unmanned air systems today (2014), http://www.army-technology.com/features/featurethe-realities-of-autonomy-in-unmanned-air-systems-today-4175047/
U.S. Government Accountability Office, General Aviation: Observations Related to Liability Insurance Requirements and Coverage for Aircraft Owners, GAO-15-740 (2015), http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-15-740
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG (outside the USA)
About this entry
Cite this entry
Zoldi, D.M.K., Hyer, T.L., Switzer, J.L. (2018). Regulation of US Airspace in the Autonomous Age. In: Valavanis, K., Vachtsevanos, G. (eds) Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32193-6_174-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32193-6_174-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32193-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32193-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering