Skip to main content

Synonyms

Research methods; Scientific method; Study methods

Definition

Models of inquiry are methods of organized and systematic scientific process used by scholars for controlled investigations and experiments to logically and efficiently solve theoretical and practical problems, and generate whenever possible discoveries and/or science advances. Comparative is a concept that derives from the verb “to compare” (Latin comparare, derivation of par = equal, with prefix com-) and is a systematic comparison, in this case, of the models of inquiry.

Introduction

Methods of scientific inquiry are important patterns to understand scientific problems and explain causes of natural phenomena and social issues (cf., Coccia and Benati 2018; Coccia 2017a, b). They generally aim to obtain new knowledge in the form of testable explanations, conjectures, and generalizations that scientists can use to explain and predict phenomena in nature and society (Kaplan 2009). The main elements of the methods of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benati I, Coccia M (2017) General trends and causes of high compensation of government managers in the OECD countries. Int J Public Adm. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1318399. ISSN: 1532-4265

  • Chamberlin TC (1897) The method of multiple working hypotheses. J Geol 5(8):837–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia M (2017) A theory of general causes of violent crime: homicides, income inequality and deficiencies of the heat hypothesis and of the model of CLASH. Aggress Violent Behav 37:190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia M, Benati I (2018) Comparative studies, Chapter No. 1197-1. In: Farazmand A (ed) Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance –section bureaucracy. Springer International Publishing AG, Cham, pp 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_1197–1. ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia M, Wang L (2016) Evolution and convergence of the patterns of international scientific collaboration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113(8):2057–2061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccia M (2017a) Sources of technological innovation: Radical and incremental innovation problem-driven to support competitive advantage of firms. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 29(9):1048–1061. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1268682

  • Coccia M (2017b) The source and nature of general purpose technologies for supporting next K-waves: Global leadership and the case study of the U.S. Navy’s Mobile User Objective System. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 116(March): 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.019

  • Collins J, Hall E, Paul L (2004) Causation and counterfactuals. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J (1938) Logic: the theory of inquiry. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson NR (1958) Patterns of discovery: an inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel CG (1965) Aspects of scientific explanation. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JG (1990) Method of multiple working hypotheses: a chimera. Geology 18:44–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan A (2009) The conduct of inquiry. Methodology for behavioural science. Transaction publishers, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D (1973) Counterfactuals. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer R (1955) Analogy in science. Presented at the sixty-third annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, 4 Sept

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce CS (1992) The essential Peirce (two volumes edited by the Peirce edition project). Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp 1992–1999

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper C (1959) The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Railsback LB (2004) T. C. Chamberlin’s “Method of multiple working hypotheses”: an encapsulation for modern students. Houston Geol Soc Bull 47(2):68–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothchild I (2006) Induction, deduction, and the scientific method, an eclectic overview of the practice of science. Society for the Study of Reproduction, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JE (1978) Purpose and thought. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard P (1988) Computational philosophy of science. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson J (2002) Strategy. An introduction to game theory. W.W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • West Churchman C, Ackoff RL (1950) Methods of inquiry: an introduction to philosophy and scientific method. Educational Publishers, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Coccia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Coccia, M., Benati, I. (2018). Comparative Models of Inquiry. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_1199-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_1199-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics