Skip to main content

Anticipation and Narratology

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Anticipation

Abstract

In one of the first analyses of its kind, this chapter examines how the tools and heuristics of narratology (the study of narrative) might enhance the study of anticipation. It assesses whether narratological insights into the ways in which stories narrate and readers read might enable us to tell better stories about the future and at the same time to become better readers of the possible worlds that such stories anticipate. Investigating the theory and praxis of anticipation across a broad temporal range of possible (fictional) and actual (real) world models and narratives (from antiquity to postmodernity), it scopes some of the pitfalls and possibilities opened up by treating the future as “storied.” It engages with the latest studies on cognitive narratology, possible world’s theories, and so-called future narratives, examining anticipatory narratives particularly relating to the environment and to the self. It argues that the stories we tell about the future, including our future selves, must be open, multi-linear, and multidimensional in order to avoid anticipatory backshadowing, which forecasts the future as a continuation of the past and present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott, H. P. (2008). The future of all narrative futures. In J. Phelan & P. Rabinowitz (Eds.), A companion to narrative theory (pp. 529–541). Malden: Blackwell Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bal, M. ([1985] 2009). Narratology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, M. (2011). Who am I? Narration and its contribution to self and identity. Theory & Psychology, 21(1), 3–24. doi:10.1177/0959354309355852. Accessed 30 September 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bode, C., & Dietrich, R. (2013). Future narratives. Berlin: W. de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, B. (2009). On the origin of stories. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeman, T. (2005). Thinking ahead: A cognitive approach to prolepsis. Narrative, 13(2), 125–159. doi:10.1353/nar.2005.0007. Accessed 30 September 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, P. (1984). Reading for the plot. New York: A.A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., Graumlich, L., & Steffen, W. (2007). Sustainability or collapse? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press in cooperation with Dahlem University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, M. (2007). About time. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error. New York: Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dannenberg, H. (2008). Coincidence and counterfactuality. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1979). The role of the reader. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fludernik, M. (1996). Towards a ‘natural’ narratology. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fludernik, M. (2010). Postclassical narratology. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, E. (1927). Aspects of the novel. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genette, G. (1980). Narrative discourse. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, U. (1997). Chronoschisms: Time, narrative, and postmodernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, D. (1999). Narratologies. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, D. (2002). Story logic. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, P. (2003). The mind and its stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huxtable, R. (2015). Advance decisions: Worth the paper they are (not) written on? End of Life Journal, 5, 2. doi:10.1136/eoljnl-2015-000002. Accessed 30 September 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D. (2013). Antiquity and the meanings of time. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kermode, F. (1967). The sense of an ending. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meister, J. (2014). Narratology. In P. Hühn (Ed.), Handbook of narratology (pp. 623–645). Berlin: W. de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miall, D. (1995). Anticipation and feeling in literary response: A neuropsychological perspective. Poetics, 23(4), 275–298. doi:10.1016/0304-422x(95)00004-4. Accessed 30 September 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morson, G. (1994). Narrative and freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Intelligence Council (U.S.). (2004). Mapping the global future. Washington, DC: National Intelligence Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nünlist, R. (2009). The ancient critic at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R. (2007). Three obstructions: Forms of causation, chronotopoids, and levels of reality. Axiomathes, 17(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, G. (1987). A dictionary of narratology. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, B. (2002). Narrative dynamics. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. (1984-1988). Time and narrative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M.-L. (1991). Possible worlds, artificial intelligence and narrative theory. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M.-L. (2014). Possible worlds. In P. Hühn (Ed.), Handbook of narratology (pp. 726–742). Berlin: W. de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M.-L. (2015). Narrative as virtual reality 2: Revisiting immersion and interactivity in literature and electronic media. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, R. (2005). Emotion and narrative. In D. Herman, M. Jahn, & M. Ryan (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory (pp. 135–137). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staley, D. (2002). A history of the future. History and Theory, 41(4), 72–89. doi:10.1111/1468-2303.00221. Accessed 30 September 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleb, N. (2007). The black swan. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uprichard, E. (2011). Narratives of the future: Complexity, time and temporality. In W. P. Vogt & M. Williams (Eds.), Sage handbook of innovation in social research methods. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellek, R., & Warren, A. (1949). Theory of literature. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Genevieve Liveley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Liveley, G. (2017). Anticipation and Narratology. In: Poli, R. (eds) Handbook of Anticipation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_7-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_7-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31737-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31737-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics