Skip to main content

Formal Concept Analysis in Statistical Hypothesis Testing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Towards a Post-Bertalanffy Systemics

Part of the book series: Contemporary Systems Thinking ((CST))

  • 718 Accesses

Abstract

In the present research, we examined the solution of a “Hypothesis Testing for Paired Samples t-test” problem that can be ideally subdivided into four parts: (1) hypothesis generation and formal expression, (2) calculation of the t value, (3) identification of the correct critical t value for the acceptance-refusal of H 0, and (4) the assumption of the correct decision from the comparison between the calculated t and the critical t value. Different response patterns for the problem were obtained. The derived structure represents a partial order. The relation between response patterns and the single elements of the main exercise can be well represented within the framework of the Formal Concept Analysis. From the analysis of the response patterns of a sample of 114 students in a psychometrics course, we derived a Formal Context where the six parts of the “Hypothesis Testing for Paired Samples t-test” exercise were the formal attributes and the response patterns were the formal objects. In our sample only 25 out of the 26 possible response patterns were encountered. A Logistic Model has been applied to develop a measure of the adequacy of each solution’s pattern actually observed. The obtained results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ganter, B., & Wille, R. (1999). Formal concept analysis: Mathematical foundations. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Duquenne, V. (1999). Latticial structures in data analysis. Theoretical Computer Science, 217, 407–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Birkoff, G. (1967). Lattice theory. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Belohlavek, R., De Baets, B., & Konecny, J. (2014). Granularity of attributes in formal concept analysis. Information Sciences, 260, 149–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schrepp, M. (1999). On the empirical construction of implications between bi-valued test items. Mathematical Social Sciences, 38, 361–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schrepp, M. (2003). A method for the analysis of hierarchical dependencies between items of a questionnaire. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(1), 43–79.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ünlü, A., & Malik, W. A. (2008). Psychometric data analysis: A size/fit trade-off evaluation procedure for knowledge structures. Journal of Data Science, 6, 491–514.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Xu, W., Pang, J. Z., & Luo, S. (2014). A novel cognitive system model and approach to transformation of information granules. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 55, 853–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eraldo Nicotra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nicotra, E., Spoto, A. (2016). Formal Concept Analysis in Statistical Hypothesis Testing. In: Minati, G., Abram, M., Pessa, E. (eds) Towards a Post-Bertalanffy Systemics. Contemporary Systems Thinking. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24391-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics