Skip to main content

Comparison and Test for Several Typical Cloud Computing Platforms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Data Analysis and Applications

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 370))

Abstract

Since cloud computing is proposed, increasing enterprises are investing and researching on it for the high scalability, powerful computing capability and inexpensiveness. Quite a number of cloud computing platforms were put forward. This paper analyzed several typical cloud platforms and compared the differences between these platforms. Finally, the paper deployed an experimental platform based on VMware cloud, and then test the computing performance of the platform with massive floating car data. The results show that the cloud computer platform can shorten the calculation time of mass data and improve performance significantly with high scalability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Foster I, Zhao Y, Raicu I, Lu S (2008) Cloud computing and grid computing 360-degree compared. In: Grid computing environments workshop, GCE’08, pp. 1–10, IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mell P, Grance T (2009) The NIST definition of cloud computing. Natl Inst Stand Technol 53(6):50

    Google Scholar 

  3. Armbrust M, Fox A, Griffith R, Joseph AD, Katz R, Konwinski A, Zaharia M (2010) A view of cloud computing. Commun ACM 53(4):50–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. The Top 10 Strategic Technology Trends for 2015. http://www.gartner.com/technology/research/top-10-technology-trends/

  5. Wei H, Yang Y, Chen H, Xu B, Li J, Jiang M, Lu A (2014) Predicting health care risk with big data drawn from clinical physiological parameters. In: Social media processing. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 88–98

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao C, Jin D, Chen G, Hao W, Song L, Zhao M (2013) Intelligent traffic service based on cloud computing. In: 4th IEEE international conference on software engineering and service science (ICSESS), 2013, pp 313–316, IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen CS, Liang WY, Su HY (2015) A cloud computing platform for ERP applications. Appl Soft Comput 27:127–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Qian L, Luo Z, Du Y, Guo L (2009) Cloud computing: an overview. In: Cloud computing. Springer, Berlin, pp 626–631

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ekanayake J, Fox G (2010) High performance parallel computing with clouds and cloud technologies. In: Cloud computing. Springer, Berlin, pp 20–38

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gillen A, Broussard FW, Perry R, Dowling S (2007) Optimizing infrastructure: the relationship between it labor costs and best practices for managing the windows desktop. America: Microsoft

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ostermann S, Iosup A, Yigitbasi N, Prodan R, Fahringer T, Epema D (2010) A performance analysis of EC2 cloud computing services for scientific computing. In: Cloud computing. Springer Berlin, pp 115–131

    Google Scholar 

  12. Amazon EC2. http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/

  13. Cloudwatch for memory usage. https://forums.aws.amazon.com/message.jspa

  14. Google (2012) Google cloud platform

    Google Scholar 

  15. Afrati FN, llman JD (2011) Optimizing multiway joins in a map-reduce environment. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 23(9):1282–1298

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dean J, Ghemawat S (2008) MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters. Commun ACM 51(1):107–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chang F, Dean J, Ghemawat S, Hsieh WC, Wallach DA, Burrows M, Gruber RE (2008) Bigtable: a distributed storage system for structured data. ACM Trans Comput Syst (TOCS) 26(2):4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Burrows M (2006) The Chubby lock service for loosely-coupled distributed systems. In: Proceedings of the 7th symposium on operating systems design and implementation, pp 335–350. USENIX Association

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported financially by the university scientific research special of Fujian Province (No. JK2014033; No. 2013HZ0002-1; No. JA13223; No. GY-Z13006).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiang Xu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Xu, X., Zou, F., Zhu, Q., Ge, X. (2015). Comparison and Test for Several Typical Cloud Computing Platforms. In: Abraham, A., Jiang, X., Snášel, V., Pan, JS. (eds) Intelligent Data Analysis and Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 370. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21206-7_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21206-7_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21205-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21206-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics