Skip to main content

Ability to Recognize Individuals

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Synonyms

Individual recognition, Individual discrimination, Face recognition

Definition

The ability to recognize individuals is a highly advantageous skill for social living species. Although not always clear, an important distinction in the literature is that between individual discrimination and individual recognition. Individual discrimination is the ability to differentiate one individual from all the rest, whereas individual recognition is the ability to differentiate each individual from every other individual and is the most precise form of recognition (Beecher 1989). This entry discusses the evidence for the recognition of conspecific individuals in nonhuman animals, specifically through the auditory and visual systems.

Introduction

Studying nonhumans provides important insight into the evolution of human sociocognitive skills, such as individual recognition. As in human societies, most social species live in groups that are structured by kinship, dominance, and reproductive...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Adachi, I., & Hampton, R. R. (2011). Rhesus monkeys see who they hear: Spontaneous cross-modal memory for familiar conspecifics. PloS One, 6(8), e23345.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Beecher, M. D. (1989). Signaling systems for individual recognition: An information theory approach. Animal Behaviour, 38(2), 248–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer, C. G. (1970). Individual recognition of voice and its development in birds. Proceedings of 15th International Orinthonological Congress, 339–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, C. D., & Emery, N. J. (2008). Using video playback to investigate the social preferences of rooks, Corvus frugilegus. Animal Behaviour, 76(3), 679–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. D., & Dooling, R. J. (1992). Perception of conspecific faces by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): I. Natural faces. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 106(3), 203–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. D., & Dooling, R. J. (1993). Perception of conspecific faces by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): II. Synthetic models. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 107(1), 48–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1998). In the eye of the beholder: The science of face perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bshary, R. (2011). Machiavellian intelligence in fishes. In C. Brown, J. Krause, & K. Laland (Eds.), Fish cognition and behavior (pp. 277–297). Cambridge, MA: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, R., & Whiten, A. (1988). Machiavellian intelligence: Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes and humans. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney, D. L., & Seyfarth, R. M. (1990). How monkeys see the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, N. J., Seed, A. M., von Bayern, A. M., & Clayton, N. S. (2007). Cognitive adaptations of social bonding in birds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 362, 489e505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, N. K. (1974). Species and individuals in the perceptual world of monkeys. Perception, 3, 105–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohda, M., Jordan, L. A., Hotta, T., Kosaka, N., Karino, K., Tanaka, H., … & Takeyama, T. (2015). Facial recognition in a group-living Cichlid Fish. PloS one, 10(11), e0142552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, D. A., & Rhodes, G. (2010). A comparative view of face perception. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 124(3), 233–251.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Micheletta, J., Whitehouse, J., Parr, L. A., Marshman, P., Engelhardt, A., & Waller, B. M. (2015). Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition in crested macaques (Macaca nigra). Royal Society Open Science, 2(5), 150109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Parr, L. A. (2011). The evolution of face processing in primates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 366(1571), 1764–1777.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pascalis, O., & Kelly, D. J. (2009). The origins of face processing in humans: Phylogeny and ontogeny. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(2), 200–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rendall, D., Rodman, P. S., & Emond, R. E. (1996). Vocal recognition of individuals and kin in free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 56, 1007–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangrigoli, S., & De Schonen, S. (2004). Recognition of own-race and other-race faces by three-month-old infants. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(7), 1219–1227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sangrigoli, S., Pallier, C., Argenti, A. M., Ventureyra, V. A. G., & De Schonen, S. (2005). Reversibility of the other-race effect in face recognition during childhood. Psychological Science, 16, 440–444.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, M. J., & Tibbetts, E. A. (2011). Specialized face learning is associated with individual recognition in paper wasps. Science, 334(6060), 1272–1275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siebeck, U. E., Parker, A. N., Sprenger, D., Mäthger, L. M., & Wallis, G. (2010). A species of reef fish that uses ultraviolet patterns for covert face recognition. Current Biology, 20(5), 407–410.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W., & Struhsaker, T. T. (1987). Primate societies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugita, Y. (2008). Face perception in monkeys reared with no exposure to faces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 394–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, C. F., Mayo, L., Stoinski, T., & Brosnan, S. F. (2015). Face discriminations by orangutans (Pongo spp.) vary as a function of familiarity. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 1, 172–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, C. F., Leverett, K. L., & Brosnan, S. F. (2016). Capuchins recognize familiar faces. Animal Behaviour, 122, 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate, A. J., Fischer, H., Leigh, A. E., & Kendrick, K. M. (2006). Behavioural and neurophysiological evidence for face identity and face emotion processing in animals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 361(1476), 2155–2172.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. K. R. (1995). Natural and relational concepts in animals. In H. Roitblat & J. A. Meyer (Eds.), Comparative approaches to cognitive science (pp. 175–224). Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomonaga, M., Itakura, S., & Matsuzawa, T. (1993). Superiority of conspecific faces and reduced inversion effect in face perception by a chimpanzee. Folia Primatologica, 61(2), 110–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsao, D. Y., & Livingstone, M. S. (2008). Mechanisms of face perception. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 31, 411–437.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, T. (1988). Upside-down faces: A review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 79(4), 471–491.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Sarah F. Brosnan and Darby Proctor for helpful feedback. CFT was funded by NSF GRFP (DGE-1051030).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine F. Talbot .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Talbot, C.F. (2016). Ability to Recognize Individuals. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1253-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1253-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics