Skip to main content

GIS-based Landscape Design Research: Exploring Aspects of Visibility in Landscape Architectonic Compositions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geodesign by Integrating Design and Geospatial Sciences

Part of the book series: GeoJournal Library ((GEODES,volume 111))

Abstract

Landscape design research is important for cultivating spatial intelligence in landscape architecture. This chapter explores GIS as a tool for landscape design research—investigating landscape designs to understand them as architectonic compositions (architectonic plan analysis). Landscape architectonic compositions and their representations embody a great wealth of design knowledge as objects of our material culture and reflect the treatment of the ground, space, image and program into a characteristic coherence. By exploring landscape architectonic compositions with GIS we can acquire design knowledge that can be used in the creation/refinement of a new design. This chapter elaborates on GIS-based visibility analysis of landscape architectonic compositions and reveals the perceived spatial potential as a basis for performance and reception. Two examples of landscape design research showcase that GIS-based isovists and viewsheds have the potential of measuring visual phenomena which are often subject of intuitive and experimental design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Batty, M. (2001). Exploring isovist fields. Space and shape in architectonic and urban morphology. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, 123–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. (1993). Elements of visual design in the landscape. London: E&FN Spon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Benedikt, M. L. (1979). To take hold of space: Isovists and isovist fields. Environment and Planning, B, 6, 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedikt, M. L., Burnham, C. A. (1981). Perceiving architectural space: from optic arrays to isovists. In W. H. Warren, R. E. Shaw, & N. J. Hillsdale, (Eds.). Persistence and Change (pp. 103–114). Lawrence Erlbaum: Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, I., Lange, E. (Eds.). (2005). Visualization in landscape and environmental planning. Technology and applications. New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R., Sekuler, R. (2006). Perception. McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquhoun, A. (1991). Composition versus the project. In idem, Modernity and the Classical Tradition. Architectural Essays, 1980–87. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (2006). Designerly ways of knowing. London: Birkhauser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dee, C. (2001). Form and fabric in landscape architecture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ervin, S., Steinitz., C. (2003). Landscape visibility computation: Necessary, but not sufficient. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30(5), 757–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, P. F. (1995). An exploration of probable viewsheds in landscape planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and design, 22, 527–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, P. F. (1996). Extending the applicability of viewsheds in landscape planning. Programmetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 62(11), 1297–1302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney, V., Stančič, Z. (1991). GIS approaches to regional analysis. A case study of the island of Hvar. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1999). Multiple intelligences. The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandell, G. (1993). Nature pictorialized. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haken, H., Portugali, J. (2003). The face of the city is its information. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 385–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higuchi, T. (1975). The visual and spatial structure of landscapes. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horrigan, P. (1995). Visual books: Representing landscapes. Proceedings of the Council of Educators in Landscape Architecture, VII, 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, H. V., Kimball, T. (1935). An introduction to the study of landscape design. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janson, A., Bürklin., T. (2002). Scenes. Interaction with Architectural Space: the Campi of Venice. Basel: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, M. (1990). The science of art. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., Zhu, C., Gold, C. (2005). Digital terrain modeling: Principles and methodology. Boca Raton: CRC press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longley, P. A., & Batty, M. (Eds.). (2003) Advanced spatial analysis. The CASA book of GIS. Redlands: ESRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llobera, M. (2003). Extending GIS-based visual analysis: the concept of visualscapes. International Journal for Geographical Information Science, 17(1), 25–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1976). Managing the sense of a region. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magleby, M. A. (2009). Reviewing the mount of Diana: Henry Hoare’s Turkish tent at Stourhead. PhD-thesis, Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. W., Mitchell, W. J., et al. (2000). The poetics of gardens. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morresi, M. (1999). Piazza San Marco. Istituzioni, Poteri e Architettura a Venezia nel primo Cinquencento. Milano: Electa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, N. T. (1971). Design on the land. The development of landscape architecture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijhuis, S. (2011). Visual research in landscape architecture. Research in Urbanism Series, 2, 103–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijhuis, S. (2013). New tools. Digital media in landscape architecture. In J. Vlug, et al. (Eds.), The need for design. Exploring Dutch landscape architecture (pp. 86–97). Velp: Van Hall Larenstein, University of Applied Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijhuis, S. (2015). GIS-based landscape design research. Stourhead landscape garden as a case study. Delft: Delft University of Technology (in preparation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijhuis, S., & Bobbink, I. (2012). Design-related research in landscape architecture. Journal of Design Research, 10(4), 239–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijhuis, S., Lammeren, R. van, & Hoeven, F. D., van der. (Eds.). (2011). Exploring the visual landscape. Advances in physiognomic landscape research in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psarra, S. (2009). Architecture and narrative. The formation of space and cultural space. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana, S. (2002). Isovist analyst extension. Version 1.1. Computer software program produced by the author at the Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reh, W. (1995). Arcadia en metropolis. Het landschapsexperiment van de verlichting. Delft: Delft University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samonà, G. (1970). Caratteri morfologici del sistema architettonico di Piazza San Marco. In G. Samonà, et al. (Eds.), Piazza San Marco. L’architettura la storia le funzioni (pp. 9–42). Padova: Marsilio Editori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samonà, G. et al. (Eds.). (1970). Piazza San Marco. L’architettura la storia le funzioni. Padova: Marsilio Editori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, O. (1965). Optik in Architektur und Städtebau. Berlin: Verlag Gebr. Mann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, J. (1991). Urbanism in Medieval Venice. In Molho, A., Raaflaub, K., & Emlen, J. (Eds.), City–states in classical antiquity and Medieval Italy. Athens, Rome, Florence and Venice (pp. 419–445). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowden, R., Thompson, P., & Troscianko, T. (2006). Basic vision. An introduction to visual perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenbergen, C. M., Meeks, S., & Nijhuis, S. (2008). Composing landscapes. Analysis, typology and experiments for design. Basel: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenbergen, C. M., Mihl, H., & Reh, W. (2002). Introduction; design research, research by design. In Steenbergen, C. M., et al. (Eds), Architectural design and composition (pp. 12–25). Bussum: Thoth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenbergen, C. M., Reh, W. (2003). Architecture and landscape. The Design experiment of the Great European gardens and landscapes. Basel: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandy, C. R. (1967). The isovist method of landscape survey. In C. R. Murray (Ed), Methods of landscape analysis (pp. 9–10). London: Landscape Research Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A., Doxa, M., O’Sullivan, D., & Penn, A. (2001). From isovists to visibility graphs: A methodology for the analysis of architectural space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and design, 28, 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzortzi, K. (2004). Building and exhibition layout. Sainsbury wing compared with castelvecchio. Architectural Research Quaterly, 8(2), 128–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der, Ham, R. J. M., & Iding, JA. (1971). De landschapstypologie naar visuele kenmerken. Methodiek en gebruik. Wageningen: Wageningen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van, Lammeren, R. (2011). Geomatics in physiognomic landscape research—A dutch view. Research in Urbanism Series, 2, 73–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von, Meiss, P. (1991). Elements of Architecture. London: E&FN Spon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, C. (2004). Information visualization. Perception for design. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkin, D. (1982). The English vision. The picturesque in architecture, landscape, and garden design. Londen: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitkamp, G. (2010). Capturing the view. A GIS based procedure to assess perceived landscape openness. Wageningen: Wageningen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, D. (1995). Cumulative viewshed analysis: A GIS-based method for investigating intervisibility, and its archaeological application. In G. Lock & Z. Stančič (Eds.), Archaeology and GIS: A European perspective. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodbridge, K. (1970). Landscape and antiquity. Aspects of English culture at Stourhead 1718–1838. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodbridge, K. (1976). The planting of ornamental schrubs at Stourhead. A history, 1746–1946. Garden History, 4(1), 88–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodbridge, K. (1996). The Stourhead landscape. The National Trust (Reprint edition 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zube, E., Simcox, D., & Law, C. (1987). Perceptual landscape simulations: History and prospect. Landscape Journal, 6(1), 62–80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steffen Nijhuis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nijhuis, S. (2014). GIS-based Landscape Design Research: Exploring Aspects of Visibility in Landscape Architectonic Compositions. In: Lee, D., Dias, E., Scholten, H. (eds) Geodesign by Integrating Design and Geospatial Sciences. GeoJournal Library(), vol 111. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08299-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics