Abstract
The VHSG is a novel non invasive diagnostic modality which allows a complete evaluation of the gynecologic system (cervix, uterus and Fallopian tubes) in a single study. It is performed with multislice computed tomography (MSCT) that obtains volumetric acquisitions in few seconds. Images can then be post-processed on diverse planes without loss of definition. The MSCT achieves the concept of isotropy where, despite the acquisition of the image on the axial plane, it can evaluate the anatomy or the pathology in any other plane with similar image quality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Carrascosa P, Baronio M, Capuňay C, et al. Multidetector computed tomography virtual hysterosalpingography in the investigation of the uterus and fallopian tubes. Clinical Imaging. 2009;33:165.
Carrascosa P, Capuñay C, Mariano B, et al. Virtual hysteroscopy by multidetector computed tomography. Abdom Imaging. 2008;33(4):381–7.
Carrascosa P, Capuñay C, Baronio M, et al. 64- Row multidetector CT virtual hysterosalpingography. Abdom Imaging. 2009;34:121–33.
Carrascosa P, Capuñay C, Vallejos J, et al. Virtual hysterosalpingography: a new multidetector CT technique for evaluating the female reproductive system. Radiographics. 2010;30:643–61.
Carrascosa P, Capuñay C, Vallejos J, et al. Virtual hysterosalpingography: experience with over 1000 consecutive patients. Abdom Imaging. 2011;36(1):1–14.
Hsieh J. Computed tomography. Bellingham: SPIE; 2003. p. 1–12.
Hu H, He HD, Foley WD, et al. Four multidetector row helical CT: image quality and volume coverage speed. Radiology. 2000;215:55–62.
Mahesh M, Scatarige JC, Cooper J, et al. Dose and pitch relationship for isotropic resolution in CT from conventional through multiple-row detector. Radiographics. 2002;22:949–62.
Kulama E. Scanning protocols for multislice CT scanners. Br J Radiol. 2004;77:S2–9.
Mc Collough CH, Zink FE. Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system. Med Phys. 1999;26:2223–30.
Mori S, Endo M, Tsunoo T, et al. Physical performance evaluation of a 256-slice CT-scanner for four-dimensional imaging. Med Phys. 2004;31(6):1348–56.
Endo M, Mori S, Kandatsu S, et al. Development and performance evaluation of the second model 256-detector row CT. Radiol Phys Technol. 2008;1(1):20–6.
Ritschl L, Sawall S, Knaup M, et al. Iterative 4D cardiac micro-CT image reconstruction using an adaptive spatio-temporal sparsity prior. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57(6):1517–25.
Beister M, Kolditz D, Kalender WA. Iterative reconstruction methods in X-ray CT. Phys Med. 2012;28(2):94–108.
Sebastian S, Kalra MK, Mittal P, et al. Can independent coronal multiplanar reformatted images obtained using state-of-the-art MDCT scanners be used for primary interpretation of MDCT of the abdomen and pelvis? A feasibility study. Eur J Radiol. 2007;64(3):439–46.
Kirchgeorg MA, Prokop M. Increasing spiral CT benefits with postprocessing applications. Eur J Radiol. 1998;28(1):39–54. Review.
Baronio M, Carrascosa P, Capuñay C, et al. Diagnostic performance of CT virtual hysteroscopy in 69 consecutive patients. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(Suppl):S77.
Capuñay C, Baronio M, Carrascosa P, et al. CT virtual hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of uterine myomas. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(Suppl):S211.
Carrascosa P, Baronio JM, Borghi M, et al. Histerosalpingoscopía virtual. Una técnica novedosa y no invasiva para diagnosticar patología intrauterina. Reproduccion. 2006;21:19–26.
Chalazonitis A, Tzovara I, Laspas F, et al. Hysterosalpingography: technique and applications. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2009;38(5):199–205.
Lee A, Ying YK, Novy MJ. Hysteroscopy, hysterosalpingography and tubal ostial polyps in infertility patients. J Reprod Med. 1997;42(6):337–41.
Radić V, Canić T, Valetić J, et al. Advantages and disadvantages of hysterosonosalpingography in the assessment of the reproductive status of uterine cavity and fallopian tubes. Eur J Radiol. 2005;53(2):268–73.
Hamed HO, Shahin AY, Elsamman AM. Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography versus radiographic hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal patency. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;105(3):215–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carrascosa, P., Capuñay, C., Sueldo, C.E., Baronio, J.M. (2014). Study and Interpretation Protocol. In: CT Virtual Hysterosalpingography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07560-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07560-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07559-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07560-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)