Skip to main content

Computing with Algebraic Automorphic Forms

  • Conference paper
Computations with Modular Forms

Part of the book series: Contributions in Mathematical and Computational Sciences ((CMCS,volume 6))

Abstract

These are the notes of a five-lecture course presented at the Computations with Modular Forms summer school, aimed at graduate students in number theory and related areas. Sections 14 give a sketch of the theory of reductive algebraic groups over Q, and of Gross’s purely algebraic definition of automorphic forms in the special case when G(R) is compact. Sections 59 describe how these automorphic forms can be explicitly computed, concentrating on the case of definite unitary groups; and Sects. 10 and 11 describe how to relate the results of these computations to Galois representations, and present some examples where the corresponding Galois representations can be identified, giving illustrations of various instances of Langlands’ functoriality conjectures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Here “representation” is in the sense of algebraic groups: just a morphism of algebraic groups from G to GL n for some n.

  2. 2.

    One has to be a little careful in defining this topology. One can equip GL n (A) with the subspace topology that comes from regarding it as an open subset of Mat n×n (A), where Mat n×n (A)≅A n has the product topology; but this is not the right topology, as inversion is not continuous (exercise!). Much better is to regard GL n (A) as a closed subset of Mat n×n (AAA n+1, given by {(m,x):det(m)x=1}. We then get a topology on G(A) for every linear group G by embedding it in GL n for some n.

  3. 3.

    Note that to define G(Z p ) we need to choose an embedding into GL n , as above; but changing our choice of embedding will only affect finitely many primes, so it introduces no ambiguity in the restricted product.

  4. 4.

    (Note added in press) To this list one could certainly add several more recent works, such as those of Chenevier-Lannes and Chenevier-Renard, which focus on the case of orthogonal groups attached to even unimodular lattices, and that of Dummigan on unitary groups of rank 4.

  5. 5.

    Note that I didn’t write “basis” here, since it may very well happen that \(\mathcal{L}\) is not free as an \(\mathcal{O}_{E}\)-module if the class number of E is >1.

  6. 6.

    So active, in fact, that substantial advances have been made in the time it has taken for these notes to be written up for publication; Dieulefait has recently given a proof of the automorphy of \(\operatorname{Sym}^{m}\) of a modular form for m=5, and Clozel and Thorne have proved the cases m=6 and m=8.

  7. 7.

    Informally, an endoscopic subgroup is “the Levi factor of a parabolic subgroup that isn’t there”. Notice that definite groups cannot have parabolic subgroups, since their split rank is 0.

  8. 8.

    Actually triples, but the third parameter is a twist by a power of the determinant and so doesn’t give you anything new.

References

  1. T. Barnet-Lamb, D. Geraghty, M. Harris, R. Taylor, A family of Calabi-Yau varieties and potential automorphy II. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 47, 29–98 (2011)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Borel, H. Jacquet, Automorphic forms and automorphic representations, in Automorphic Forms, Representations and L-Functions. Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 33 Part 1, Corvallis, 1977 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Brandt, Zur Zahlentheorie der Quaternionen. Jahresber. Dtsch. Math.-Ver. 53, 23–57 (1943)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Bump, Automorphic Forms and Representations. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 55 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Buzzard, T. Gee, The conjectural connections between automorphic representations and Galois representations, in Automorphic Forms and Galois Representations (Proceedings of the LMS Durham Symposium (2011, to appear))

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Chenevier, M. Harris, Construction of automorphic Galois representations II. Comb. Math. J. 1, 53–73 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Cogdell, H. Kim, M.R. Murty, Lectures on Automorphic L-Functions. Fields Institute Monographs, vol. 20 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Cunningham, L. Dembélé, Computing genus-2 Hilbert-Siegel modular forms over \(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5})\) via the Jacquet-Langlands correspondence. Exp. Math. 18(3), 337–345 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. L. Dembélé, Explicit computations of Hilbert modular forms on \(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5})\). Exp. Math. 14(4), 457–466 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. L. Dembélé, Quaternionic Manin symbols, Brandt matrices, and Hilbert modular forms. Math. Comput. 76(258), 1039–1057 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. L. Dembélé, S. Donnelly, Computing Hilbert modular forms over fields with nontrivial class group, in Algorithmic Number Theory. Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci., vol. 5011 (Springer, Berlin, 2008), pp. 371–386

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. W.T. Gan, J.P. Hanke, J.K. Yu, On an exact mass formula of Shimura. Duke Math. J. 107(1), 103–133 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. S.S. Gelbart, Automorphic forms on Adèle groups. Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 83 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1975)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Greenberg, J. Voight, Lattice methods for algebraic modular forms on classical groups, this volume. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-03847-6_6

  15. B.H. Gross, Algebraic modular forms. Isr. J. Math. 113, 61–93 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. J.E. Humphreys, Linear Algebraic Groups. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 21 (Springer, New York, 1975)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Lansky, D. Pollack, Hecke algebras and automorphic forms. Compos. Math. 130(1), 21–48 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. D. Loeffler, Explicit calculations of automorphic forms for definite unitary groups. LMS J. Comput. Math. 11, 326–342 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Pizer, An algorithm for computing modular forms on Γ 0(N). J. Algebra 64(2), 340–390 (1980)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. V. Platonov, A. Rapinchuk, Algebraic Groups and Number Theory. Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 139 (Academic Press Inc., Boston, 1994). Translated from the 1991 Russian original by Rachel Rowen

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. S.W. Shin, Galois representations arising from some compact Shimura varieties. Ann. Math. 173(3), 1645–1741 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. T.A. Springer, Reductive groups, in Automorphic Forms, Representations and L-Functions. Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 33 Part 1, Corvallis, 1977 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  23. T.A. Springer, Linear Algebraic Groups, 2nd edn. Progress in Mathematics, vol. 9 (Birkhäuser Boston Inc., Boston, 1998)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Tits, Reductive groups over local fields, in Automorphic Forms, Representations and L-Functions. Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 33 Part 1, Corvallis, 1977 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1979)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Loeffler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Loeffler, D. (2014). Computing with Algebraic Automorphic Forms. In: Böckle, G., Wiese, G. (eds) Computations with Modular Forms. Contributions in Mathematical and Computational Sciences, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03847-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics