Abstract
These are the notes of a five-lecture course presented at the Computations with Modular Forms summer school, aimed at graduate students in number theory and related areas. Sections 1–4 give a sketch of the theory of reductive algebraic groups over Q, and of Gross’s purely algebraic definition of automorphic forms in the special case when G(R) is compact. Sections 5–9 describe how these automorphic forms can be explicitly computed, concentrating on the case of definite unitary groups; and Sects. 10 and 11 describe how to relate the results of these computations to Galois representations, and present some examples where the corresponding Galois representations can be identified, giving illustrations of various instances of Langlands’ functoriality conjectures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Here “representation” is in the sense of algebraic groups: just a morphism of algebraic groups from G to GL n for some n.
- 2.
One has to be a little careful in defining this topology. One can equip GL n (A) with the subspace topology that comes from regarding it as an open subset of Mat n×n (A), where Mat n×n (A)≅A n has the product topology; but this is not the right topology, as inversion is not continuous (exercise!). Much better is to regard GL n (A) as a closed subset of Mat n×n (A)×A≅A n+1, given by {(m,x):det(m)x=1}. We then get a topology on G(A) for every linear group G by embedding it in GL n for some n.
- 3.
Note that to define G(Z p ) we need to choose an embedding into GL n , as above; but changing our choice of embedding will only affect finitely many primes, so it introduces no ambiguity in the restricted product.
- 4.
(Note added in press) To this list one could certainly add several more recent works, such as those of Chenevier-Lannes and Chenevier-Renard, which focus on the case of orthogonal groups attached to even unimodular lattices, and that of Dummigan on unitary groups of rank 4.
- 5.
Note that I didn’t write “basis” here, since it may very well happen that \(\mathcal{L}\) is not free as an \(\mathcal{O}_{E}\)-module if the class number of E is >1.
- 6.
So active, in fact, that substantial advances have been made in the time it has taken for these notes to be written up for publication; Dieulefait has recently given a proof of the automorphy of \(\operatorname{Sym}^{m}\) of a modular form for m=5, and Clozel and Thorne have proved the cases m=6 and m=8.
- 7.
Informally, an endoscopic subgroup is “the Levi factor of a parabolic subgroup that isn’t there”. Notice that definite groups cannot have parabolic subgroups, since their split rank is 0.
- 8.
Actually triples, but the third parameter is a twist by a power of the determinant and so doesn’t give you anything new.
References
T. Barnet-Lamb, D. Geraghty, M. Harris, R. Taylor, A family of Calabi-Yau varieties and potential automorphy II. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 47, 29–98 (2011)
A. Borel, H. Jacquet, Automorphic forms and automorphic representations, in Automorphic Forms, Representations and L-Functions. Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 33 Part 1, Corvallis, 1977 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1979)
H. Brandt, Zur Zahlentheorie der Quaternionen. Jahresber. Dtsch. Math.-Ver. 53, 23–57 (1943)
D. Bump, Automorphic Forms and Representations. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 55 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1997)
K. Buzzard, T. Gee, The conjectural connections between automorphic representations and Galois representations, in Automorphic Forms and Galois Representations (Proceedings of the LMS Durham Symposium (2011, to appear))
G. Chenevier, M. Harris, Construction of automorphic Galois representations II. Comb. Math. J. 1, 53–73 (2013)
J. Cogdell, H. Kim, M.R. Murty, Lectures on Automorphic L-Functions. Fields Institute Monographs, vol. 20 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2004)
C. Cunningham, L. Dembélé, Computing genus-2 Hilbert-Siegel modular forms over \(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5})\) via the Jacquet-Langlands correspondence. Exp. Math. 18(3), 337–345 (2009)
L. Dembélé, Explicit computations of Hilbert modular forms on \(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5})\). Exp. Math. 14(4), 457–466 (2005)
L. Dembélé, Quaternionic Manin symbols, Brandt matrices, and Hilbert modular forms. Math. Comput. 76(258), 1039–1057 (2007)
L. Dembélé, S. Donnelly, Computing Hilbert modular forms over fields with nontrivial class group, in Algorithmic Number Theory. Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci., vol. 5011 (Springer, Berlin, 2008), pp. 371–386
W.T. Gan, J.P. Hanke, J.K. Yu, On an exact mass formula of Shimura. Duke Math. J. 107(1), 103–133 (2001)
S.S. Gelbart, Automorphic forms on Adèle groups. Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 83 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1975)
M. Greenberg, J. Voight, Lattice methods for algebraic modular forms on classical groups, this volume. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-03847-6_6
B.H. Gross, Algebraic modular forms. Isr. J. Math. 113, 61–93 (1999)
J.E. Humphreys, Linear Algebraic Groups. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 21 (Springer, New York, 1975)
J. Lansky, D. Pollack, Hecke algebras and automorphic forms. Compos. Math. 130(1), 21–48 (2002)
D. Loeffler, Explicit calculations of automorphic forms for definite unitary groups. LMS J. Comput. Math. 11, 326–342 (2008)
A. Pizer, An algorithm for computing modular forms on Γ 0(N). J. Algebra 64(2), 340–390 (1980)
V. Platonov, A. Rapinchuk, Algebraic Groups and Number Theory. Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 139 (Academic Press Inc., Boston, 1994). Translated from the 1991 Russian original by Rachel Rowen
S.W. Shin, Galois representations arising from some compact Shimura varieties. Ann. Math. 173(3), 1645–1741 (2011)
T.A. Springer, Reductive groups, in Automorphic Forms, Representations and L-Functions. Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 33 Part 1, Corvallis, 1977 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1979)
T.A. Springer, Linear Algebraic Groups, 2nd edn. Progress in Mathematics, vol. 9 (Birkhäuser Boston Inc., Boston, 1998)
J. Tits, Reductive groups over local fields, in Automorphic Forms, Representations and L-Functions. Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 33 Part 1, Corvallis, 1977 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1979)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Loeffler, D. (2014). Computing with Algebraic Automorphic Forms. In: Böckle, G., Wiese, G. (eds) Computations with Modular Forms. Contributions in Mathematical and Computational Sciences, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03847-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03847-6_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03846-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03847-6
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)