Abstract
A crowd of pedestrians is a complex system that exhibits a rich variety of self-organized collective behaviors, such as lane formation, stop-and-go waves, or crowd turbulence. Understanding the mechanisms of crowd dynamics requires establishing a link between the local behavior of pedestrians during interactions, and the global dynamics of the crowd at high density. For this, the elaboration of a model is necessary.
In this contribution, we will make a distinction between two kinds of modelling methods: outcome models that are often based on analogies with Newtonian mechanics, and process models based on concepts of cognitive science. While outcome models describe directly the movements of a pedestrian by means of repulsive forces or probabilities to move from one place to another, process models generate the movement from the bottom-up by describing the underlying cognitive process used by the pedestrian during navigation.
Here, we will describe and compare two representatives of outcome and process models, namely the social force model on the one hand, and the heuristic model on the other hand. In particular, we will describe the strength and the limitations of each approach, and discuss possible future improvements for process models.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Helbing D, Molnar P, Farkas IJ, Bolay K (2001) Self-organizing pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28:361–383.
Yamori K (1998) Going with the flow : Micro-macro dynamics in the macrobehavioral patterns of pedestrian crowds. Psychological review 105:530–557.
Moussaïd M et al. (2012) Traffic Instabilities in Self-Organized Pedestrian Crowds. PLoS Comput Biol 8:e1002442.
Kretz T, Grünebohm A, Kaufman M, Mazur F, Schreckenberg M (2006) Experimental study of pedestrian counterflow in a corridor. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2006:P10001–P10001.
Helbing D, Buzna L, Johansson A, Werner T (2005) Self-Organized Pedestrian Crowd Dynamics: Experiments, Simulations, and Design Solutions. Transportation Science 39:1–24.
Helbing D, Johansson A, Al-Abideen H (2007) The Dynamics of crowd disasters: an empirical study. Physical Review E 75:46109.
Camazine S et al. (2001) Self-Organization in Biological Systems (Princeton University Press).
Moussaïd M, Perozo N, Garnier S, Helbing D, Theraulaz G (2010) The Walking Behaviour of Pedestrian Social Groups and Its Impact on Crowd Dynamics. PLoS ONE 5:e10047.
Helbing D, Farkas I, Vicsek T (2000) Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature 407:487–490.
Helbing D, Keltsch J, Molnar P (1997) Modelling the evolution of human trail systems. Nature 388:47–50.
Helbing D, Molnar P (1995) Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Physical Review E 51:4282–4286.
Helbing D (1991) A mathematical model for the behavior of pedestrians. Behavioral Science 36:298–310.
Yu WJ, Chen R, Dong LY, Dai SQ (2005) Centrifugal force model for pedestrian dynamics. Physical Review E 72:26112.
Johansson A, Helbing D, Shukla P (2007) Specification of the social force pedestrian model by evolutionary adjustment to video tracking data. Advances in Complex Systems 10:271–288.
Moussaïd M et al. (2009) Experimental study of the behavioural mechanisms underlying self-organization in human crowds. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276:2755–2762.
Johansson A, Helbing D, Al-Abideen HZ, Al-Bosta S (2008) From crowd dynamics to crowd safety: A video-based analysis. Advances in Complex Systems 11:479–527.
Hoogendoorn S, Daamen W (2007) in Traffic and Granular Flow, pp 329–340.
Helbing D, Johansson A, Mathiesen J, Jensen M, Hansen A (2006) Analytical Approach to Continuous and Intermittent Bottleneck Flows. Physical Review Letters 97:168001.
Yu W, Johansson A (2007) Modeling crowd turbulence by many-particle simulations. Physical Review E 76:46105.
Gigerenzer G, Todd P (1999) Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart (Oxford University Press).
Gigerenzer G, Brighton H (2009) Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science 1:107–143.
Bennis W, Pachur T (2006) Fast and frugal heuristics in sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 7:611–629.
Moussaïd M, Helbing D, Theraulaz G (2011) How simple rules determine pedestrian behavior and crowd disasters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 108:6884–6888.
Gibson J (1979) The Ecological Approach To Visual Perception (Houghton Mifflin).
Gibson JJ (1958) Visually controlled locomotion and visual orientation in animals. British Journal of Psychology 49:182–194.
Hillier B, Hanson J (1984) The Social Logic of Space (Cambridge University Press).
Garling T, Garling E (1988) Distance minimization in downtown pedestrian shopping. Environment and Planning A 20:547–554.
Penn A, Turner A (2002) in Pedestrian and Evacuation dynamics, eds Schreckenberg M, Sharma S (Springer), pp 99–114.
Turner A (2007) in 6th International Space Syntax Symposium, eds Kubat AS, Ertekin O, Guney YI, Eyuboglu.
Ondřej J, Pettré J, Olivier A-H, Donikian S (2010) A synthetic-vision based steering approach for crowd simulation. ACM Trans Graph 29:1–9.
Cutting JE, Vishton PM, Braren PA (1995) How we avoid collisions with stationary and with moving obstacles. Psychological Review 102:627–651.
Batty M (1997) Predicting where we walk. Nature 388:19–20.
Turner A, Penn A (2002) Encoding natural movement as an agent-based system: an investigation into human pedestrian behaviour in the built environment. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 29:473–490.
Johansson A (2009) Constant-net-time headway as a key mechanism behind pedestrian flow dynamics. Physical Review E 80:26120.
Ballerini M et al. (2008) Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105:1232.
Steffen B (2008) in Conference proceedings of PED2008 (Springer, Berlin).
Ma J, Song W, Zhang J, Lo S, Liao G (2010) k-nearest-neighbor interaction induced self-organized pedestrian counter flow. Physica A 389:2101–2117.
Still K (2000) Crowd Dynamics.
Daamen W, Hoogendoorn S (2002) Controlled experiments to derive walking behaviour. Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 3:39–59.
Hutchinson J, Gigerenzer G (2005) Simple heuristics and rules of thumb: Where psychologists and behavioural biologists might meet. Behavioural Processes 69:97–124.
Nelson J, Cottrell G (2007) A probabilistic model of eye movements in concept formation. Neurocomputing 70:2256–2272.
Sereno MI et al. (1995) Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Science 268:889–893.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Moussaïd, M., Nelson, J.D. (2014). Simple Heuristics and the Modelling of Crowd Behaviours. In: Weidmann, U., Kirsch, U., Schreckenberg, M. (eds) Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2012. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02447-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02447-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02446-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02447-9
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)