Skip to main content

Researching Multimodality in Language and Education

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Research Methods in Language and Education

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of Language and Education ((ELE))

  • 226 Accesses

Abstract

Multimodality has emerged out of relative obscurity over the past two decades as a term that has purchase in language and literacy research, theory, and practice. This chapter is concerned with research methods and approaches to the study of multimodality in language and education. Origins, early developments, and current uses of multimodality are discussed. Research methods that examine multimodal meaning-making operate across varied contexts and use diverse heuristics and research tools.

Multimodality explains communication as a combination of modes of representation and expression within text designs (with the term text referring to communicative acts beyond but including print or writing). The various multiple modes of expression can be visual (e.g., drawing, painting, video), print (e.g., books, newspapers, environmental print), gestural (e.g., miming, pointing, acting out), dramatic (e.g., role-playing, improvisation, formal acting), and oral (e.g., informal talk, public speaking) modes (Kress Multimodality. In: Cope B, Kalantzis M (eds) Multiliteracies: literacy learning and the design of social futures. Routledge, London, pp 182–202, 2000; Stein TESOL Q 32(3): 517–528, 1998). Kress often stands as a harbinger of multimodality with his theory and writings over the years, but this field can be traced to earlier theorists such as Halliday (with whom Kress studied).

Major research trends in response to early developments have emphasized design, digital and visual literacies, juxtapositions of home and school literacies, and interests in material culture, to name a few. Current explorations of embodiment, Deleuzian approaches, material culture, cultural geography, and gamification have resulted in innovative research methods. Challenges of multimodal applications to educational contexts that move beyond representation and that address earlier claims and issues of equity and social justice are described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bazalgette, C., & Buckingham, D. (2013). Literacy, media and multimodality: A critical response. Literacy, 2, 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, D., & Clinton, K. (2002). Limits of the local: Expanding perspectives on literacy as a social practice. Journal of Literacy Research, 34(3), 337–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, C. (2015). Immaterializing literacies. In J. Rowsell & K. Pahl (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of literacy studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, S. (2013). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, M. (1975). What did I write?: Beginning writing behaviour. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, D. R. (2015). “I’m just trying to be tough, okay”: Masculine performances of everyday practices. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 15(2), 203–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Castell, S., Boschman, L., & Jensen, J. (2008). In and out of control: Learning games differently. Loading…, 2(3), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (trans: Massumi B.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, A. H. (1982). The emergence of visible language: Interrelationships between drawing and early writing. Visible Language, 16(4), 360–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2006). What is literacy? In P. I. Vandenberg, S. I. Hum, & J. I. Clary-Lemon (Eds.), Relations, locations, positions: Composition theory for writing teachers (pp. 29–39). Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, A. (2014). Zigging and zooming all over the place: Young children’s meaning making and movement in the museum. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 14(1), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1988). Social semiotics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, G., & Nelson, M. E. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22(2), 224–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, G. E. (2013/2014). Reimagining multiliteracies: A response to Leander and Boldt. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57, 270–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. (2014, Dec). Attempting to do no harm: Inquiring into embodied literacies of space in community-based research. Symposium presentation at annual meeting of Literacy Research Association, Marcos Island, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenner, C. (2004). Becoming biliterate: Young children learning different writing systems. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2000). Multimodality. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 182–202). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Like Halliday. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leander, K., & Boldt, G. (2013). Rereading “A pedagogy of multiliteracies”: Bodies, texts, and emergence. Journal of Literacy Research, 45, 22–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture & Activity, 7(4), 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C., & Tierney, J. D. (2013). Mobilizing emotion in an urban classroom: Producing identities and transforming signs in a race-related discussion. Linguistics and Education, 24, 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, J. (2005). Popular culture, new media, and digital literacy in early childhood. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, K. (2007). Timescales and ethnography: Understanding a child’s meaning-making across three sites, a home, a classroom, and a family literacy class. Ethnography and Education, 2(2), 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (2006). Travel notes from the new literacy studies. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1977). Semiotics and significs. In C. S. Hardwick (Ed.), Semiotics and significs. The correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Lady Victoria Welby. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, F. D. (1959). Course in general linguistics (trans: Baskin, W.). In C. Bally, A. Sechehaye, & A. Riedlinger (Eds.). New York: Philosophical Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. K. (2003). Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan-Rabideau, M. P., & Rowsell, J. (2010). Design literacies: Learning and innovation in the digital age. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, M. (1995). More than words: The generative power of transmediation for learning. Canadian Journal of Education, 20(4), 455–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, M., & Panofsky, C. P. (2009). Designs for multimodality in literacy studies: Explorations in analysis. In K. M. Leander (Ed.), 58th yearbook of the national reading conference (pp. 99–111). Oak Creek: National Reading Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, P. (1998). Reconfiguring the past and the present: Performing literacy histories in a Johannesburg classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 517–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwend, K. E. (2009). Damsels in discourse: Girls consuming and producing identity texts through Disney princess play. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(1), 57–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jennifer Rowsell or Diane R. Collier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Rowsell, J., Collier, D.R. (2016). Researching Multimodality in Language and Education. In: King, K., Lai, YJ., May, S. (eds) Research Methods in Language and Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02329-8_23-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02329-8_23-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02329-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics