Skip to main content

Signed Language Socialization in Deaf Communities

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:
Language Socialization

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of Language and Education ((ELE))

  • 98 Accesses

Abstract

Language socialization in Deaf communities is unique in ways that are challenging for language socialization theory. Worldwide, indigenous signed languages emerge wherever Deaf individuals have sustained social interaction among themselves, but historically they have been stigmatized and marginalized. Most Deaf children are born into non-Deaf households without access to signed language from birth, often acquiring a signed language through informal social networks in later years. Following the recognition of signed languages as bona fide linguistic systems in the 1960s, ethnographic studies documented language socialization in a variety of contexts: families, educational settings, Deaf clubs, isolated Deaf/non-Deaf rural communities, and transnational events. As evidence of the linguistic status of natural signed languages mounted, political movements championing the rights of Deaf people as linguistic and cultural minorities led to the establishment of bilingual education programs for Deaf children. Simultaneously, changes in educational policy and advances in technology and medicine began to negatively affect patterns of signed language socialization. Most Deaf children are now educated in local school settings where signed languages are usually absent, and the dominant discourses promoting the techno-medical eradication of Deaf people threaten to obfuscate and trivialize the Deaf child’s need for optimal language socialization in natural signed languages and majority spoken languages. One surprising characteristic of signed language communities is their tenacity in the face of efforts to suppress and eradicate them, especially given the discontinuity of traditional caregiver-to-child language socialization across generations. Signed language socialization studies in such circumstances promise contributions to theory building offered by few communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The authors use capital Deaf (with a capital D) throughout the chapter to portray Deaf people through an anthropological perspective, except when denoting an individual’s hearing status.

  2. 2.

    DEAF-WORLD (Lane et al. 1996) denotes a community not defined by geography or ethnicity that consists of speakers who use an indigenous signed language as a primary language..

References

  • Anglin-Jaffe, H. (2013). Signs of resistance: Peer learning of sign languages within ‘oral’ schools for the deaf. Studies in Philosophy of Education, 32, 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagga-Gupta, S. (1999–2000). Visual language environments: Exploring everyday life and literacies in Swedish deaf bilingual schools. Visual Anthropology Review, 15, 95–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C., & Battison, R. (1980). Sign language and the Deaf community: Essays in honor of William C. Stokoe. Silver Spring: National Association of the Deaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baynton, D. (1996). Forbidden signs: American culture and the campaign against sign language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, L. (2000). The development of sociolinguistic meanings: The worldview of a deaf child within his home environment. In M. Metzger (Ed.), Bilingualism and identity in Deaf communities (pp. 219–254). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branson, J., Miller, D., & Marsaja, I. (1996). Everyone here speaks sign language, too: A deaf village in Bali, Indonesia. In C. Lucas (Ed.), Multicultural aspects of sociolinguistics in deaf communities (pp. 39–57). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breivik, J. (2005). Deaf identities in the making: Local lives, transnational connections. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, A., & Boese, R. (1972). Sign language and the teaching of deaf children. In C. Cazden, V. Johns, & D. Hymes (Eds.), Functions of language in the classroom (pp. 32–62). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramér-Wolrath, E. (2013). Parallel bimodal bilingual acquisition: A hearing child mediated in a Deaf family. Sign Language Studies, 13, 516–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erting, C. (1982). Deafness, communication, and social identity: An anthropological analysis of interaction among parents, teachers, and Deaf children in a preschool. PhD dissertation, American University, Washington, DC, Dissertation Abstracts International (43), 11, 3641. (UMI No. 8306972). Published in 1994 as Deafness, communication, social identity: Ethnography in a preschool for deaf Children. Burtonsville: Linstok Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erting, L. (2006). Beyond strategies: Book sharing the Deaf way, DVD. Washington, DC: Laurent Clerc National Deaf Education Center, Gallaudet University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erting, C., Johnson, R., Smith, D., & Snider, B. (Eds.). (1994). The Deaf way: Perspectives from the international conference on Deaf culture. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, A., & Falk, W. (1986). Learning to be Deaf. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwyn, S., & Acredolo, L. (1998). Encouraging symbolic gestures: Effects on the relationship between gesture and speech. In J. Iverson & S. Goldin-Meadows (Eds.), The nature and functions of gesture in children’s communication (pp. 61–73). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groce, N. (1985). Everyone here spoke sign language: Hereditary deafness on Martha’s Vineyard. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1991). Door into Deaf culture: Folklore in an American Deaf social club. Sign Language Studies, 73, 421–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haualand, H., & Allen, C. (2009). Deaf people and human rights. Helsinki: World Federation of the Deaf and Swedish National Association of the Deaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. (1991). Sign language, culture, and community in a traditional Yucatec Maya village. Sign Language Studies, 73, 461–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. (2006). Cultural constructs that impede discussions about variability in speech-based educational models for deaf children with cochlear implants. Perspectiva, 24, 29–80. n. Especial (July/December), Florianopolis, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R., & Erting, C. (1989). Ethnicity and socialization in a classroom for deaf children. In C. Lucas (Ed.), The sociolinguistics of the Deaf community (pp. 41–83). New York: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, T. (2004). W(h)ither the deaf community? Population, genetics, and the future of Australian sign language. American Annals of the Deaf, 148(5), 358–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantor, R. (1982). Communicative interaction: Mother modification and child acquisition of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 36, 233–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuntze, M. (2000). Codeswitching in ASL and written-English contact. In K. Emmorey & H. Lane (Eds.), Signed language research: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima (pp. 287–302). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, P. (2003). Understanding Deaf culture: In search of Deafhood. Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, H., Hoffmeister, R., & Bahan, B. (1996). A journey into the DEAF-WORLD. San Diego: Dawn Sign Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, E. (2014). Effective Deaf action in the Deaf community in Uruguay. In H.-D. Bauman & J. Murray (Eds.), Deaf gain: Raising the stakes for human diversity (pp. 321–340). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowicz, H., & Woodward, J. (1978). Language and the maintenance of ethnic boundaries in the deaf community. In R. Wilbur (Ed.), Sign language research, a special issue of communication and cognition (Vol. 11, pp. 29–38).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, M. (1984). A deaf child’s natural development of literacy. Sign Language Studies, 44, 191–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadow, K. (1972). Sociolinguistics, sign language, and the deaf subculture. In T. O’Rourke (Ed.), Psycholinguistics and total communication: The state of the art (pp. 19–33). Washington, DC: American Annals of the Deaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellon, N., Niparko, J., Rathmann, C., Mathur, G., Humphries, T., Napoli, D., Handley, T., Schambler, S., & Lantos, J. (2015). Should all deaf children learn sign language? Pediatrics, 136(1), 170–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan, L., Schmaling, C., Nakamura, K., & Turner, G. (2003). Many ways to be Deaf: International variation in Deaf communities. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller de Quadros, R., Strobel, K., & Masutti, M. (2014). Deaf gains in Brazil: Linguistic policies and network establishment. In H.-D. Bauman & J. Murray (Eds.), Deaf gain: Raising the stakes for human diversity (pp. 341–355). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mweri, J. (2014). Diversity in education: Kenyan sign language as a medium of instruction in schools for the deaf in Kenya. Multilingual Education, 4, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J., & Nash, A. (1981). Deafness in society. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, A. (2007). Emergence of an indigenous sign language and a speech/sign community in Ban Khor, Thailand. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, A. (2012). Language socialization and language endangerment. In A. Duranti, E. Ochs, & B. Schieffelin (Eds.), The handbook of language socialization (pp. 610–630). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padden, C., & Humphries, T. (2005). Inside Deaf culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preisler, G. (1983). Deaf children in communication: A study of communicative strategies used by Deaf children in social interactions. Laholm: Trydells Tryckeri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, P. (1994). Mother father Deaf: Living between sound and silence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, C., & Reilly, N. (2005). The rising of lotus flowers: Self-education by Deaf children in Thai boarding schools. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senghas, R., Senghas, A., & Pyers, J. (2005). The emergence of Nicaraguan Sign Language: Questions of development, acquisition and evolution. In J. Langer, S. Parker, & C. Milbrath (Eds.), Biology and knowledge revisited: From neurogenesis to psychogenesis (pp. 287–306). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snoddon, K. (2014). Baby sign as Deaf gain. In H.-D. Bauman & J. Murray (Eds.), Deaf gain: Raising the stakes for human diversity (pp. 133–145). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe, W. (1960). Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication system of the American Deaf. Studies in Linguistics: Occasional Papers 8, Buffalo: University of Buffalo. (Reprinted 1976, 1993. Silver Spring, Linstok Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tervoort, B. (1961). Esoteric symbolism in the communication behavior of young deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf, 106, 436–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlig, A. (2015). The notion of the nation compared: Deafhood and Indianness. In P. Dörrenbächer & M. Neuburger (Eds.), Nationalism and identities among indigenous people: Case studies from North America (pp. 217–246). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washabaugh, W. (1981). Sign language and its social context. Annual Review of Anthropology, 10, 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkens, C. P., & Hehir, T. P. (2008). Deaf education and bridging social capital: A theoretical approach. American Annals of the Deaf, 153(3), 275–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (1976). Bilingual experiences of a Deaf child. Sign Language Studies, 10, 37–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winn, S. (2007). Sign language acquisition and use by single-generation deaf adults in Australia who attended specific educational settings for deaf and hard of hearing children. Sign Language Studies, 8(1), 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeshan, U., & de Vos, C. (Eds.). (2012). Sign languages in village communities. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter and Ishara Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol J. Erting .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Erting, C.J., Kuntze, M. (2017). Signed Language Socialization in Deaf Communities. In: Duff, P., May, S. (eds) Language Socialization. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02327-4_26-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02327-4_26-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02327-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02327-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Signed Language Socialization in Deaf Communities
    Published:
    31 March 2017

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02327-4_26-2

  2. Original

    Signed Language Socialization in Deaf Communities
    Published:
    17 December 2016

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02327-4_26-1