Skip to main content

The Creative Potential of Humor

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 932 Accesses

Part of the book series: Analecta Husserliana ((ANHU,volume 116))

Abstract

The paper focuses upon creativity as the essential trait of philosophically understood humor and the comic.

Arthur Koestler’s bisociation theory is referred to, which interprets humor as one of the forms of human creative activity, consisting in the ability to perceive phenomena simultaneously in traditionally separate and incompatible planes of reference. True humor escapes routine, presenting familiar situations from multiple angles and thus in a new light. The akin potential can stimulate creativity also in other spheres of human activity, including art or science.

Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka’s phenomenology of the human creative act, which is shown to possess its universal cosmic foundation is also applied to analyze humor as one of the manifestations of the sources of life.

In the present author’s opinion, humor can be recognized as a symbolic – though perverse – expression of the creative potential inherent in human spirit as well as in life itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cf. Mircea Eliade, The Sacred and The Profane: The Nature of Religion, trans. Willard R. Trask (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1961); C. G. Jung, The Archetypes of the Collective Unconscious, in Collected Works of C. G. Jung (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968), Vol. 9, Part 1.

  2. 2.

    Maurice Charney, “Comic Creativity in Plays, Films, and Jokes”, in Handbook of Humor Research, ed. Paul E. Mcghee and Jeffrey H. Goldstein (New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, Tokyo: Springer-Verlag, 1983), p. 34.

  3. 3.

    Arthur Koestler, The Act of Creation (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1967).

  4. 4.

    Cf. Don L.F. Nilsen, Humor—Other Views http://science.jrank.org/pages/9718/Humor-Other-Views.html (access: 10/15/2012).

  5. 5.

    Immanuel Kant, Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).

  6. 6.

    Cf. Sigmund Freud, The Joke and Its Relation to the Unconscious (New York: Penguin Classics, 2002).

  7. 7.

    Cf. John Morreall, “Introduction”, in The Philosophy of Laughter and Humor, John Morreal, ed. (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1987), p. 6.

  8. 8.

    Marcella Tarozzi Goldsmith, Nonrepresentational Forms of the Comic. Humor, Irony, Jokes (New York: P. Lang, 1991), p. 30.

  9. 9.

    Cf. Helmut Plessner, Laughing and Crying: A Study of the Limits of Human Behavior, trans. J. S. Churchill and Marjorie Grene (Evanston, IL: Nortwestern University Press, 1970).

  10. 10.

    Arthur Koestler, op. cit., p. 56.

  11. 11.

    Ibidem, p. 64.

  12. 12.

    Cf. Sigmund Freud, The Joke and Its Relation to the Unconscious, op. cit.

  13. 13.

    Lawrence Kimmel, “Philosophy, Literature, and Laughter. Notes on an Ontology of the Moment”, in Enjoyment: From Laughter to Delight in Philosophy, Literature, the Fine Arts, and Aesthetics, ed. Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka (Dirdrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998), pp. 176–177.

  14. 14.

    Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka, “Introduction”, in Enjoyment: From Laughter to Delight in Philosophy, Literature, the Fine Arts, and Aesthetics, op. cit., p. xi–xii.

  15. 15.

    Ibidem.

  16. 16.

    Marcella Tarozzi Goldsmith, “Nonrepresentative Forms of the Comic. Humor, Irony, Jokes”, in Enjoyment: From Laughter to Delight in Philosophy, Literature, the Fine Arts, and Aesthetics, op.cit., p. 29.

  17. 17.

    Maurice Charney, “Comic Creativity in Plays, Films, and Jokes”, op. cit., p. 34.

  18. 18.

    Ibidem.

  19. 19.

    Roman Ingarden, The Literary Work of Art, trans. George G. Grabowicz (Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 1973), § § 64, 68.

  20. 20.

    Ibidem, § 64.

  21. 21.

    Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka, “Introduction”, in Enjoyment: From Laughter to Delight in Philosophy, Literature, the Fine Arts, and Aesthetics, op. cit., p. xiii.

  22. 22.

    Ibidem.

  23. 23.

    As an example of such metaphysical quality Ingarden cites the grotesque. Cf. Roman Ingarden, The Literary Work of Art, op. cit., § 48.

  24. 24.

    Lawrence Kimmel, “Philosophy, Literature, and Laughter. Notes on an Ontology of the Moment”, op. cit., p. 181.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Malecka Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Malecka, A. (2014). The Creative Potential of Humor. In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) Phenomenology of Space and Time. Analecta Husserliana, vol 116. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02015-0_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics