Abstract
Intraoperative imaging technologies have improved surgical results in glioma and pituitary adenoma surgeries. With improvements and refinements 3T intraoperative MRI systems offer a potential of further improving these results. Hereby we describe the equipment and technique of a cost-effective shared-resource 3-T Ultra-high field intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging system and report our continuing experience on surgical tumor resection.
A description of the facility design and equipment are given along with examples from our experience on low-grade gliomas and transsphenoidal surgeries. Our facility based on the twin room concept and uses a 3-T Siemens Trio (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) scanner. The unit consists of adjacent but independent MRI and operative suites, which are connected by a wide door for ioMRI procedure but are used as conventional MRI and operative units. Rigid head fixation during neurosurgery is achieved with a custom designed 5 pin head-rest which also combines a 4+4 channel head coil. Operation is performed using regular non-MRI compatible equipment and the patient is transferred to the MRI during the procedure using a custom designed floating table. Advanced sequences such as diffusion weighted and diffusion tensor imaging, MR angiography, MR venography, MR spectroscopy can be performed with no changes in the setup and result in image quality comparable to outpatient scans.
The intraoperative 3-T ultra high field MRI unit with the twin room concept permits both diagnostic outpatient imaging and image guided surgery in the same setting and is a cost effective solution to afford a highly capable ioMRI system.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Piepmeier JM (2009) Current concepts in the evaluation and management of WHO grade II gliomas. J Neurooncol 92:253–259
Keles GE, Lamborn KR, Berger MS (2001) Low-grade hemispheric gliomas in adults: a critical review of extent of resection as a factor influencing outcome. J Neurosurg 95:735–745
Sanai N, Berger MS (2008) Glioma extent of resection and its impact on patient outcome. Neurosurgery 62:753–764, Discussion 264–266
Schwartz RB, Hsu L, Wong TZ, Kacher DF, Zamani AA, Black PM, Alexander ER, Stieg PE, Moriarty TM, Martin CA, Kikinis R, Jolesz FA (1999) Intraoperative MR imaging guidance for intracranial neurosurgery: experience with the first 200 cases. Radiology 211:477–488
Steinmeier R, Fahlbusch R, Ganslandt O, Nimsky C, Buchfelder M, Kaus M, Heigl T, Lenz G, Kuth R, Huk W (1998) Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging with the magnetom open scanner: concepts, neurosurgical indications, and procedures: a preliminary report. Neurosurgery 43:739–747, discussion 747–748
Bohinski RJ, Kokkino AK, Warnick RE, Gaskill-Shipley MF, Kormos DW, Lukin RR, Tew JMJ (2001) Glioma resection in a shared-resource magnetic resonance operating room after optimal image-guided frameless stereotactic resection. Neurosurgery 48:731–742, discussion 742–744
Claus EB, Horlacher A, Hsu L, Schwartz RB, Dello-Iacono D, Talos F, Jolesz FA, Black PM (2005) Survival rates in patients with low-grade glioma after intraoperative magnetic resonance image guidance. Cancer 103:1227–1233
Senft C, Seifert V, Hermann E, Franz K, Gasser T (2008) Usefulness of intraoperative ultra low-field magnetic resonance imaging in glioma surgery. Neurosurgery 63:257–266, discussion 266–267
Hall WA, Liu H, Martin AJ, Pozza CH, Maxwell RE, Truwit CL (2000) Safety, efficacy, and functionality of high-field strength interventional magnetic resonance imaging for neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 46:632–641, discussion 641–642
Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Fahlbusch R (2005) Comparing 0.2 tesla with 1.5 tesla intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of setup, workflow, and efficiency. Acad Radiol 12:1065–1079
Kaibara T, Saunders JK, Sutherland GR (1999) Utility of a moveable 1.5 Tesla intraoperative MR imaging system. Can J Neurol Sci 26:313–316
Hatiboglu MA, Weinberg JS, Suki D, Rao G, Prabhu SS, Shah K, Jackson E, Sawaya R (2009) Impact of intraoperative high-field magnetic resonance imaging guidance on glioma surgery: a prospective volumetric analysis. Neurosurgery 64:1073–1081, discussion 1081
Nimsky C, Fujita A, Ganslandt O, Von Keller B, Fahlbusch R (2004) Volumetric assessment of glioma removal by intraoperative high-field magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 55:358–370, discussion 370–371
Hall WA, Galicich W, Bergman T, Truwit CL (2006) 3-Tesla intraoperative MR imaging for neurosurgery. J Neurooncol 77:297–303
Pamir MN, Ozduman K, Dincer A, Yildiz E, Peker S, Ozek MM (2009) First intraoperative, shared-resource, ultrahigh-field 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging system and its application in low-grade glioma resection. J Neurosurg
Pamir MN, Peker S, Ozek MM, Dincer A (2006) Intraoperative MR imaging: preliminary results with 3 tesla MR system. Acta Neurochir Suppl 98:97–100
Jankovski A, Francotte F, Vaz G, Fomekong E, Duprez T, Van Boven M, Docquier MA, Hermoye L, Cosnard G, Raftopoulos C (2008) Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging at 3-T using a dual independent operating room-magnetic resonance imaging suite: development, feasibility, safety, and preliminary experience. Neurosurgery 63:412–424, discussion 424–426
McClain CD, Soriano SG, Goumnerova LC, Black PM, Rockoff MA (2007) Detection of unanticipated intracranial hemorrhage during intraoperative magnetic resonance image-guided neurosurgery. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg 106:398–400
Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Hastreiter P, Wang R, Benner T, Sorensen AG, Fahlbusch R (2007) Preoperative and intraoperative diffusion tensor imaging-based fiber tracking in glioma surgery. Neurosurgery 61:178–185, discussion 186
Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Merhof D, Sorensen AG, Fahlbusch R (2006) Intraoperative visualization of the pyramidal tract by diffusion-tensor-imaging-based fiber tracking. Neuroimage 30:1219–1229
Hadani M, Spiegelman R, Feldman Z, Berkenstadt H, Ram Z (2001) Novel, compact, intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging-guided system for conventional neurosurgical operating rooms. Neurosurgery 48:799–807, discussion 807–809
Ramina R, Coelho Neto M, Giacomelli A, Barros EJ, Vosgerau R, Nascimento A, Coelho G (2009) Optimizing costs of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. A series of 29 glioma cases. Acta Neurochir
Maesawa S, Fujii M, Nakahara N, Watanabe T, Saito K, Kajita Y, Nagatani T, Wakabayashi T, Yoshida J (2009) Clinical indications for high-field 1.5 T intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and neuro-navigation for neurosurgical procedures. Review of initial 100 cases. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 49:340–349, discussion 349–350
Pamir MN, Ozduman K (2009) 3-T ultrahigh-field intraoperative MRI for low-grade glioma resection. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 9:1537–1539
Ekinci G, Akpinar IN, Baltacioglu F, Erzen C, Kilic T, Elmaci I, Pamir N (2003) Early-postoperative magnetic resonance imaging in glial tumors: prediction of tumor regrowth and recurrence. Eur J Radiol 45:99–107
Truwit CL, Hall WA (2006) Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging-guided neurosurgery at 3-T. Neurosurgery 58:ONS-338–ONS45, discussion ONS-345–ONS-346
McBride DQ, Miller BL, Nikas DL, Buchthal S, Chang L, Chiang F, Booth RA (1995) Analysis of brain tumors using 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Surg Neurol 44:137–144
Duprez TP, Jankovski A, Grandin C, Hermoye L, Cosnard G, Raftopoulos C (2008) Intraoperative 3T MR imaging for spinal cord tumor resection: feasibility, timing, and image quality using a “twin” MR-operating room suite. Am J Neuroradiol 29:1991–1994
Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R (2006) Intraoperative visualization for resection of gliomas: the role of functional neuronavigation and intraoperative 1.5 T MRI. Neurol Res 28:482–487
Ntoukas V, Krishnan R, Seifert V (2008) The new generation polestar n20 for conventional neurosurgical operating rooms: a preliminary report. Neurosurgery 62:82–89, discussion 89–90
Kilic T, Ozduman K, Elmaci I, Sav A, Necmettin Pamir M (2002) Effect of surgery on tumor progression and malignant degeneration in hemispheric diffuse low-grade astrocytomas. J Clin Neurosci 9:549–552
Kilic T, Ekinci G, Seker A, Elmaci I, Erzen C, Pamir MN (2001) Determining optimal MRI follow-up after transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma: scan at 24 hours postsurgery provides reliable information. Acta Neurochir 143:1103–1126
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag/Wien
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pamir, M.N. (2011). 3 T ioMRI: The Istanbul Experience. In: Pamir, M., Seifert, V., Kiris, T. (eds) Intraoperative Imaging. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum, vol 109. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-99651-5_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-99651-5_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-211-99650-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-211-99651-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)