Abstract
This paper uses the resources provided by systems of illocutionary logic to characterize an opposition among assertive illocutionary acts that is parallel to incompatibility or inconsistency among statements. It is argued that opposition, or incoherence, among assertive illocutionary acts is more fundamental than inconsistency, and that our understanding of incoherence “underwrites” our conception of inconsistency. Diagrams are provided to illustrate relations of incoherence that are like such traditional diagrams as the square of opposition, which displays relations among statements.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Kearns, J.T.: Conditional assertion, denial, and supposition as illocutionary acts. Linguist. Philos. 29, 455–485 (2006)
Vanderveken, D., Searle, J.: Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Basel
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kearns, J.T. (2012). Two Concepts of Opposition, Multiple Squares. In: Béziau, JY., Jacquette, D. (eds) Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition. Studies in Universal Logic. Springer, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0379-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0379-3_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Basel
Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-0378-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-0379-3
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)