Skip to main content

The Square of Opposition and Generalized Quantifiers

  • Chapter
Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition

Part of the book series: Studies in Universal Logic ((SUL))

Abstract

In this paper I propose a set-theoretical interpretation of the logical square of opposition, in the perspective opened by generalized quantifier theory. Generalized quantifiers allow us to account for the semantics of quantificational Noun Phrases, and of other natural language expressions, in a coherent and uniform way. I suggest that in the analysis of the meaning of Noun Phrases and Determiners the square of opposition may help representing some semantic features responsible to different logical properties of these expressions. I will conclude with some consideration on scope interactions between quantifiers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    S is the symbol for the syntactic category of ‘sentence’, VP for ‘verb phrase’.

  2. 2.

    The distinction here introduced is slightly different from the original characterization of definite NPs as filters due to Barwise and Cooper [2] and revisited by Loebner [4]. For example, the classification here proposed has the concept of filter in common with the characterization of NPs in Loebner [4], but the method of “squaring” logical properties of quantifiers involves some not negligible differences. The effect of the inner negation in determining contradiction or contrariness is here the only parameter used in distinguishing quantifiers. As a consequence, three classes of quantifiers are proposed, while Loebner essentially distinguishes only between filters and ultrafilters, as his main concern, in the cited article, is the semantics of definite NPs, and not NPs overall considered as generalized quantifiers.

References

  1. Altman, A., Peterzil, Y., Winter, Y.: Scope dominance with upward monotone quantifier. J. Log. Lang. Inf. 14, 445 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Barwise, J., Cooper, R.: Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguist. Philos. 4, 159–219 (1981)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Lindström, P.: First order predicate logic with generalized quantifiers. Theoria 32, 186–195 (1966)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Loebner, S.: Natural language and generalized quantifier theory. In: Gärdenfors, P. (ed.) Generalized Quantifiers, pp. 181–202. Reidel, Dordrecht (1987)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Mostowsky, A.: On a generalization of quantifiers. Fundam. Math. 44, 12–36 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Parsons, T.: The traditional square of opposition. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/square (2006)

  7. Peters, S., Westerståhl, D.: Quantifiers in Language and Logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Westerståhl, D.: Self-commuting quantifiers. J. Symb. Log. 61, 212–224 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duilio D’Alfonso .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Basel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

D’Alfonso, D. (2012). The Square of Opposition and Generalized Quantifiers. In: Béziau, JY., Jacquette, D. (eds) Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition. Studies in Universal Logic. Springer, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0379-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics