Skip to main content

Programming Nao as an Educational Agent: A Comparison Between Choregraphe and Python SDK

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 393))

Abstract

Programming a humanoid robot for educational purpose is a demanding task for a beginner with little experience. Several studies are available in which humanoid robots such as NAO, are used in educational settings to move, recognize objects and hold conversations similar to a human. These studies usually incorporate third party libraries and advanced deep-learning methods making it difficult for a beginner to follow. This paper aims to work as a getting-started guide for someone starting out with programming the NAO robot using Choregraphe and the Python SDK. In this study, NAO robot is used to implement four scenarios based on - dialog, movement, object recognition and obstacle avoidance - using the available components that come with the robot. The paper focuses on comparing the Choregraphe and NAO Python SDK during this process by considering the advantages and limitations of both approaches. The results show that both Choregraphe and the Python SDK have their nuances and their usage depends on the use case. However, for a beginner just starting out, Choregraphe is easier to get things done without writing a single line of code. Python, on the other hand is useful for low-level functionalities and provides rather more flexibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. R. Ros, et al., Child-robot interaction in the wild: advice to the aspiring experimenter, in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, ICMI 2011 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2011), pp. 335–342

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Mishra, K. Parish, R.G. Lugo, H. Wang, A framework for using humanoid robots in the school learning environment. Electronics 10(6), 756 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Matić, Z. Kovačić, Nao robot as demonstrator of rehabilitation exercises after fractures of hands, in 2019 International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM) (IEEE, 2019), pp. 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  4. D.C. Tozadore, A.H.M. Pinto, C.M. Ranieri, M.R. Batista, R.A.F. Romero, Tablets and humanoid robots as engaging platforms for teaching languages, in 2017 Latin American Robotics Symposium (LARS) and 2017 Brazilian Symposium on Robotics (SBR) (IEEE, 2017), pp. 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  5. Y.C. Dündar, A robot system for personalized language education. implementation and evaluation of a language education system built on a robot. Munin.uit.no (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Liu, A human-following Nao robot using python programming language. Theseus.fi (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Amberkar, Humanoid robot handling hand-signs recognition. Munin.uit.no (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Mondou, A. Prigent, A. Revel, A dynamic scenario by remote supervision: a serious game in the museum with a Nao robot, in ACE 2017, ed. by A.D. Cheok, M. Inami, T. Romão. LNCS, vol. 10714 (Springer, Cham, 2018), pp. 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76270-8_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. N. Zeng, S. Zheng, J. Zhou, Q. Cai, Design and implementation of virtual instructor based on NAO robot, in ICMIR 2017, ed. by F. Qiao, S. Patnaik, J. Wang. AISC, vol. 690 (Springer, Cham, 2018), pp. 464–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65978-7_70

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. R.C. Hsu, Y.-P. Lin, C.-J. Lin, L. Lai, Humanoid robots for searching and kicking a ball and dancing, in 2020 IEEE Eurasia Conference on IOT, Communication and Engineering (ECICE) (IEEE, 2020), pp. 385–387

    Google Scholar 

  11. M.A. Miskam, S. Shamsuddin, H. Yussof, A.R. Omar, M.Z. Muda, Programming platform for Nao robot in cognitive interaction applications, in 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Robotics and Manufacturing Automation (ROMA), pp. 141–146 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anushka Subedi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Subedi, A., Pandey, D., Mishra, D. (2022). Programming Nao as an Educational Agent: A Comparison Between Choregraphe and Python SDK. In: Ben Ahmed, M., Boudhir, A.A., Karaș, İ.R., Jain, V., Mellouli, S. (eds) Innovations in Smart Cities Applications Volume 5. SCA 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 393. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94191-8_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94191-8_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-94190-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-94191-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics