Abstract
3D anatomical medical imaging (CT-scan or MRI) can provide a vision of patient anatomy and pathology. But for any human, even experts, these images have two drawbacks: each voxel density is visualized in grey levels, which are totally inadequate for human eye cones’ perception, and the volume is cut in slices, making any 3D mental representation of the real 3D anatomy of the patient highly complex. Usually, the limits of human perception are overcome by human knowledge. In anatomy, this knowledge is a mix between the average anatomy definition and anatomical variations. But how to understand an anatomical variation from slices in grey levels? In routine, such a difficulty can sometimes be so important that it creates errors. Fortunately, these mistakes can be overcome through 3D patient-specific surgical anatomy. New computer-based medical image analysis and associated 3D modelling provide a highly efficient solution by allowing a patient-specific virtual copy of their anatomic reconstruction. Some articles reporting clinical studies show that up to one-third of initial planning is modified using 3D modelling, and that this modification is always validated efficiently intraoperatively. They also demonstrate that major errors can thus be avoided. In this chapter, we propose to illustrate the 3D modelling process and the associated benefit on a set of patient clinical cases in three main domains: liver surgery, thoracic surgery, and kidney surgery. In each case, we will present the limits of usual medical image analysis due to an average anatomical definition and limited human perception. 3D modelling is provided by the Visible Patient online service and the surgeon then plans his/her surgery on a simple PC using the Visible Patient Planning software. We will then compare the result obtained from a normal anatomical analysis with the result obtained from the 3D modelling and associated preoperative planning. These examples illustrate the great benefit of using patient-specific 3D modelling and preoperative virtual planning in comparison with the usual anatomical definition using only medical image slices. These examples also confirm that this new patient-specific anatomy corrects many mistakes created by the current standard definition, increased by physician interpretation that can vary from one person to another.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bégin A, Martel G, Lapointe R, Belblidia A, Lepanto L, Soler L, Mutter D, Marescaux J, Vandenbroucke-Menu F (2014) Accuracy of preoperative automatic measurement of the liver volume by CT-scan combined to a 3D virtual surgical planning software. Surg Endosc 28(12):3408–3412
Bismuth H (1982) Surgical anatomy and anatomical surgery of the liver. World J Surg 6:3–9
Couinaud C (1999) Liver anatomy: portal (and suprahepatic) or biliary segmentation. Digestive Surgery 1999(16):459–467
Couinaud C (2002) Erreur dans le diagnostic topographique des lésions hépatiques. Ann Chir 127:418–430
Fasel J (2008) Portal venous territories within the human liver: an anatomical reappraisal. Anat Rec 291:636–642
Fasel JHD, Selle D, Evertsz CJC, Terrier F, Peitgen HO, Gailloud P (1988) Segmental anatomy of the liver: poor correlation with CT1. Radiology 206:151–156
Fischer L, Cardenas C, Thorn M, Benner A, Grenacher L, Vetter MA, Lehnert T, Klar E, Meinzer H-P, Lamade W (2002) Limits of Couinaud’s liver segment classification: a quantitative computer-based three-dimensional analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26(6):962–967
Goldsmith NA, Woodburne RT (1957) Surgical anatomy pertaining to liver resection. Surg Gynecol Obstet 105:310
Gossot D, Seguin-Givelet A (2018a) Thoracoscopic right S9 + 10 segmentectomy. J Vis Surg 4:181
Gossot D, Seguin-Givelet A (2018b) Anatomical variations and pitfalls to know during thoracoscopic segmentectomies. J Thorac Dis. 10(Suppl 10):S1134–S1144
Gossot D, Lutz J, Grigoroiu M, Brian E, Seguin-Givelet A (2016) Thoracoscopic anatomic segmentectomies for lung cancer: technical aspects. J Viz Surg 2(171):1–8
He Y-B, Bai L, Aji T, Jiang Y, Zhao J-M, Zhang J-H, Shao Y-M, Liu W-Y, Wen H (2015) Application of 3D reconstruction for surgical treatment of hepatic alveolar echinococcosis. World J Gastroenterol 21(35):10200–10207
Le Moal J, Peillon C, Dacher JN, Baste JM (2018) Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction for operative planning in robotic segmentectomy: a pilot study. J Thorax Dis 10(1):196–201
Mutter D, Dallemagne B, Bailey C, Soler L, Marescaux J (2009) 3D virtual reality and selective vascular control for laparoscopic left hepatic lobectomy. Surg Endosc 23:432–435
Mutter D, Soler L, Marescaux J (2010) Recent advances in liver imaging. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 4(5):613–621(9)
Nelson RC, Chezmar JL, Sugarbaker PH, Murray DR, Bernardino ME (1990) Preoperative localization of focal liver lesions to specific liver segments: utility of CT during arterial portography. Radiology 176:89–94
Platzer W, Maurer H (1966) Zur Segmenteinteilung der Leber. Acta Anat 63:8–31
Rieker O, Mildenberger P, Hintze C, Schunk K, Otto G, Thelen M (2000) Segmental anatomy of the liver in computed tomography: do we localize the lesion accurately? Röfo 172(2):147–152
Soler L (2006) Surgical Simulation and Training applied to urology, Annual meeting of the British Association of Urological Surgeons, Manchester (Royaume-Uni), 30th June 2006
Soler L (2016) La technologie 3D dans la chirurgie urologique d’aujourd’hui et de demain. Congrès Urofrance Paris
Soler L, Delingette H, Malandain G, Montagnat J, Ayache N, Koehl C, Dourthe O, Malassagne B, Smith M, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2001) Fully automatic anatomical, pathological, and functional segmentation from CT scans for hepatic surgery. Comput Aided Surg 6(3):131–142
Soler L, Nicolau S, Pessaux P, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2014) Real time 3D image reconstruction guidance in liver resection surgery. Hepatob Surg Nutrit 3(2):73–81
Soler L, Mutter D, Pessaux P, Marescaux J (2015) Patient-specific anatomy: the new area of anatomy based on computer science illustrated on liver. J Vis Surg 1:21
Soler L, Nicolau S, Pessaux P, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2017) Augmented reality in minimally invasive digestive surgery, Pediatric Digestive Surgery 2017, Mario Lima Editor, Springer, 421–432
Soyer P, Roche A, Gad M et al (1991) Preoperative segmental localization of hepatic metastese: ulility of three-dimensional CT during arterial portography. Radiology 180:653–658
Strunk H, Stuckmann G, Textor J, Willinek W (2003) Limitations and pitfalls of Couinaud’s segmentation of the liver in transaxial imaging. Eur Radiol 13:2472–2482
Takasaki K (1998) Glissonean pedicle transsection method for hepaticesection. A new concept of liver segmentation. J of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surg 5(3):286–291
Wang X-D, Wang H-G, Shi J, Duan W-D, Luo Y, Ji W-B, Zhang N, Dong J-H (2017) Traditional surgical planning of liver surgery is modified by 3D interactive quantitative surgical planning approach: a single-center experience with 305 patients. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 16(3):271–278
Acknowledgements
These research works contain a part of results obtained in the FP7 E-health project PASSPORT, funded by the European Commission’s ICT program and in the French PSPC project 3D-Surg supported by BPI France.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Soler, L., Mutter, D., Marescaux, J. (2021). Patient-Specific Anatomy: The New Area of Anatomy Based on 3D Modelling. In: Uhl, JF., Jorge, J., Lopes, D.S., Campos, P.F. (eds) Digital Anatomy . Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61905-3_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61905-3_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61904-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61905-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)