Abstract
CollaboratED is a research initiative exploring the opportunities and challenges for collaborative work between online and on-campus students within the Digital Media Design Masters programme at the University of Edinburgh, where group projects are an important aspect of the learning process. CollaboratED asks students and academic staff about the benefits and challenges to group work, looking to find ways to successfully bring on-campus and online learners into a creative and shared studio environment. This paper discusses the outcomes from the longitudinal research, involving questionnaires, observations, and individual interviews with students and lecturers on the programme. The research findings suggest that the challenges that online students face are mostly focused on balancing work and studies, but also relate to working from different time zones and overcoming cultural differences within the team. Despite these challenges, the students recognise the benefits of group discussion and sharing resources with their peers, mostly, however, they value the sense of being part of a community. Despite positive responses towards group discussion and collaboration, in both on-campus and online cohorts, the largest percentage of students prefer to work alone where course assignments are concerned.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexander PM (2002) Teamwork, trust and information. In: Proceedings of the 2002. Annual research conference of the South African Institute of computer scientists and information technologists on Enablement through technology (SAICSIT ‘02). South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists, Republic of South Africa, pp 65–74
Bandura A (1977) Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall, Oxford, England
Berthoud R (2000) Introduction: the dynamics of social change. In: Berthoud R, Gershuny J (eds) Seven years in the lives of British families. Policy Press, Bristol, pp 1–20
Creswell JW (2012) Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
Diaz D, Cartnal R (1999) Students’ learning styles in two classes: online distance learning and equivalent on-campus. College Teach 47(4):130–135. Retrieved February 28, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/27558962
D P (1999) What do you mean by collaborative learning? In: Dillenbourg P, Dillenbourg P (eds) Collaborative-learning: cognitive and computational approaches. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 1–19
Gee DG (1990) The impact of students’ preferred learning style variables in a distance education course: a case study. Eastern New Mexico University (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No ED 358 836), Portales
Gokhale AA (1995) Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. J Technol Educ 7:22–30
Goold A, Craig A, Coldwell J (2008) The Student experience of working in teams online. Proceedings ASCILITE Melbourne 2008, Melbourne, pp 343–352
Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Stanne ME (2000) Cooperative learning methods: a metanalysis. University of Minnesota, Cooperative Learning Center, Minneapolis
Macmillan R, Arvidson A, Edwards S, Soteri-Proctor A, Taylor R, Teasdale S (2011) First impressions: Introducing the ‘Real Times’ third sector case studies. TSRC, Birmingham
Neale, B. (2017). Generating data in qualitative longitudinal research: a review of field told and techniques. Timescapes Working Paper No. 8
Neale B (2018) What is qualitative longitudinal research?. Bloomsbury Academic, London
Ritchie J, Lewis J (eds) (2003) Qualitative research practice. Sage, London
Silverman D, Marvasti A (2008) Doing qualitative research: a comprehensive guide. Sage Publications. Thousand Oaks, California
Smith N (2003) Cross-sectional profiling and longitudinal analysis: research notes on analysis in the LQ study ‘negotiating transitions in citizenship. Int J Soc Res Methodol 6(3):273–277
Staggers J, Garcia S, Nagelhout E (2008) Teamwork through team building: Face-to-face to online. Bus Commun Q 71:472–487
Stenning K, McKendree J, Lee J, Cox R, Dineen F, Mayes JT (1999). Vicarious learning from educational dialogue. CSCL
Totten S, Sills T, Digby A, Russ P (1991) Cooperative learning: a guide to research. Garland, New York
Acknowledgements
We would like to gratefully acknowledge that CollaboratED was funded by the Principal’s Teaching Award Scheme of the University of Edinburgh. Without this support we would have not been able to conduct this research, so essential for the students and tutors on the programme.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Petrova, D., Savadova, S. (2021). Collaborative Learning in a Shared Digital Studio. In: Martins, N., Brandão, D., Raposo, D. (eds) Perspectives on Design and Digital Communication. Springer Series in Design and Innovation , vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49647-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49647-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49646-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49647-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)