Abstract
On June 5th 2015, Malaysia was shocked by an earthquake with Mw6.1 which had struck Ranau, one of the districts in Sabah. The moderate earthquake was the strongest recorded since the Mw5.8 earthquake which occurred in Lahad Datu in 1976. The Ranau earthquake had caused minor to severe damages to local buildings. Although Sabah is located outside the Pacific Ring of Fire, there are some regions which set at risk of earthquake namely as Kundasang, Ranau, Pitas, Lahad Datu and Tawau. After experiencing the tremors from both local and regional earthquakes, Malaysian now aware on the importance of seismic design on buildings and structures. However, the effect of seismic design application on cost of materials need to be studied beforehand. In relation to that, this study presents the seismic design of reinforced concrete hotel or dormitory building with consideration of different magnitude of reference peak ground acceleration, αgR and different soil type. Result shows that both parameters strongly influencing the cost of steel reinforcement. The latter is estimated to be increase around 14–247% higher compared to similar building without seismic design.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adiyanto MI, Majid TA (2014) Seismic design of two storey reinforced concrete building in Malaysia with low class ductility. J Eng Sci Technol 9(1):27–46
Adiyanto MI, Majid, Ahmad Jani F, Mustapha SAHS, Ahmad SW (2019) Estimation on amount of steel reinforcement for six storey hospital with seismic design consideration in Malaysia. In: IOP conference series: earth and environmental sciences, vol 244, p 012015
Adiyanto MI, Majid TA, Nazri FM (2017) Nonstructural damages of reinforced concrete buildings due to 2015 ranau earthquake. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol 1865, p 090002
Bernama (2015) Gempa Sabah: Gegaran Terkuat Sejak 1976. https://www.hmetro.com.my/node/56001. Accessed on 30 Mar 2019
CEN Eurocode (2002) Basis of structural design. Brussels. European Committee for Standardization
CEN Eurocode 1 (2002) Action on structures part 1: general actions—densities, self weight, imposed loads for buildings. Brussels. European Committee for Standardization
CEN Eurocode 8 (2004) Design of structures for earthquake resistance part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels. European Committee for Standardization
Hamid NH, Azmi A, Adiyanto MI, Mohamad M (2018) Seismic performance of two-bay two-storey RC frame under in-plane lateral cyclic loading. Malaysian Constr Res J 25(2):61–73
Harith NSH, Adnan A, Shoushtari AV (2015) Seismic hazard assessment of east Malaysia region. In: International conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Floating MSC ORCHESTRA Cruiser, 12–16 May
Khoiry MA, Hamzah N, Osman SA, Mutalib AA, Hamid R (2018) Physical damages effect on residential houses caused by the earthquake at Ranau, Sabah Malaysia. Int J Eng Technol 10(5):414–418
Majid TA (2009) Less than one percent of buildings in Malaysia have earthquake preventive measures. http://www.ssig.gov.my/blog/2009/10/12/less-than-1-of-buildings-in-malaysia-have-earthquake-preventive-measures/. Accessed on 19 Mar 2019
Majid TA, Adnan A, Adiyanto MI, Ramli MZ, Ghuan TC (2017) Preliminary damage assessment due to 2015 Ranau earthquake. Int J Civil Eng Geo-Environ 49–54. Special Publication NCWE2017
Malaysia National Annex to Eurocode 8 (2017) Design of structures for earthquake resistance part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Selangor. Department of Standards Malaysia
Marto A, Tan CS, Kassim F, Mohd Yunus NZ (2013) Seismic impact in peninsular Malaysia. In: The 5th international geotechnical symposium, Incheon, 22–24 May
McClure J, Wills C, Johnston D, Recker C (2011) How the 2010 canterbury (darfield) earthquake affected earthquake risk perception: comparing citizens inside and outside the earthquake region. Australas J Disaster Trauma Stud 2011(2):3–10
Ramli MZ, Adnan A, Kadir MAA, Alel MNA (2017) Cost comparison for non-seismic (EC@) and seismic (EC8) design in different ductility class. Int J Civil Eng Geo-Environ 38–42. Special Publication NCWE2017
Acknowledgements
All authors acknowledged the financial support from Internal Research Grant number RDU1703240 provided by Universiti Malaysia Pahang as well as facilities provided in design laboratory.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Adiyanto, M.I., Rashid, N.H.M., Mustapa, S.A.H.S., Ramli, N.I. (2020). Comparison on Total Weight of Steel Reinforcement for 5 Story Reinforced Concrete Building with and Without Seismic Design. In: Mohamed Nazri, F. (eds) Proceedings of AICCE'19. AICCE 2019. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 53. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32816-0_48
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32816-0_48
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32815-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32816-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)