Abstract
Scientific literacy should be accessible to every child and adolescent as part of their right to quality education. Unfortunately, many science learning materials present phenomena and examples that are only familiar to students from mainstream cultural backgrounds in affluent countries. Without examples of how to make science relevant for children and adolescents of all ethnic and language backgrounds and of all socioeconomic status and nationalities, teachers will see themselves ill-prepared to educate the next generation of citizens that can effectively respond to challenges such as climate change, public health, and sustainable agriculture, among others. All children and adolescents must become scientifically literate to respond to such challenges, especially the most marginalized, who are often the most affected by these issues. Against this backdrop, this book offers diverse examples of how to make science education significant and useful for learners in diverse scenarios and contexts in different parts of the world. These examples are derived from rigorous studies demonstrating that the contextualization of science learning environments is essential for student engagement in learning science.
The examples presented in this book illustrate the value and challenges of contextualizing science education in a wide variety of national contexts and educational levels, allowing the reader to gain an international global perspective while exploring different under-studied contexts (e.g., the Galapagos Islands, the Aegean region of Turkey, and the highlands of Eastern Mexico, among others). Moreover, through the reflective chapters, the reader gains insight into how the proposed contextualization approaches are relevant for science teacher education, educational policy, and research in science education.
The views expressed in this chapter are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aikenhead, G. (1994). What is STS teaching? In J. Solomon & G. Aikenhed (Eds.), STS education: International perspectives on reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
Aikenhead, G. S. (2001). Students’ ease in crossing cultural borders into school science. Science Education, 85(2), 180–188.
Arıkan, A., & Taraf, H. U. (2010). Contextualizing young learners’ English lessons with cartoons: Focus on grammar and vocabulary. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5212–5215.
Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 612–637.
Becker, M., McElvany, N., & Kortenbruck, M. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 773–785.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school (Expanded ed.). Washington: National Academies Press. Retrieved from gbv.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3375510.
Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 715.
Costa, V. (1995). When science is “another world”: Relationships between worlds of family, friends, school, and science. Science Education, 79(3), 313–333.
Choshi, K., Lubben, F., Gaoseb, N., Kandjeo-Marenga, U., Kapenda, H., & Campbell, B. (2005). The role of everyday contexts in learner-centred teaching: The practice in Namibian secondary schools. International Journal of Science Education, 27(15), 1805–1823. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500277854.
Delen, I., & Krajcik, J. (2015). What do students’ explanations look like when they use second-hand data? International Journal of Science Education, 37(12), 1953–1973.
Disessa, A. A., & Sherin, B. L. (1998). What changes in conceptual change? International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1155–1191.
Fortus, D., & Krajcik, J. (2012). Curriculum coherence and learning progressions. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 783–798). Dordrecht: Springer.
Fortus, D., Krajcik, J., Dershimer, R. C., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Design-based science and real-world problem-solving. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 855–879.
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Teacher’s College Press.
Giamellaro, M. (2014). Primary contextualization of science learning through immersion in content-rich settings. International Journal of Science Education, 36(17), 2848–2871.
Herrera, S. G., Holmes, M. A., & Kavimandan, S. K. (2012). Bringing theory to life: Strategies that make culturally responsive pedagogy a reality in diverse secondary classrooms. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 14(3), p. 5.
Hong, Y., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55(7), 709.
Hug, B., & McNeill, K. L. (2008). Use of first-hand and second-hand data in science: Does data type influence classroom conversations? International Journal of Science Education, 30(13), 1725–1751.
Kärkkäinen, K. (2012). Bringing about curriculum innovations: Implicit approaches in the OECD area. OECD Education Working Papers, 82. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/5k95qw8xzl8s.pdf?expires=1353945114&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=59BDC2846AED5D76CCC2B2700F2976B3
Kasanda, C., Lubben, F., Gaoseb, N., Kandjeo-Marenga, U., Kapenda, H., & Campbell, B. (2005). The role of everyday contexts in learner-centred teaching: The practice in Namibian secondary schools. International Journal of Science Education, 27(15), 1805–1823. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500277854.
King, D., & Ritchie, S. M. (2012). Learning science through real-world contexts. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Klassen, S. (2006). Contextual assessment in science education: Background, issues, and policy. Science Education, 90(5), 820–851.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: Aka the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74–84.
Lederman, N. G. (1999). EJSE editorial: The state of science education: Subject matter without context. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(2), 1–6.
Lee, O. (2003). Equity for culturally and linguistically diverse students in science education: A research agenda. Teachers College Record, 105, 465–489.
Nashon, S. M., & Anderson, D. (2013). Interpreting student views of learning experiences in a contextualized science discourse in Kenya. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(4), 381–407.
National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. In R. A. Duschl, H. A. Schweingruber, & A. W. Shouse (Eds.), Committee on science learning, kindergarten through eighth grade (Board on Science Education, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Ng’Asike, J. T. (2011). Turkana children’s rights to education and indigenous knowledge in science teaching in Kenya. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 8(1), 55–67.
NRC. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
OECD. (2006). Personalising education (Schooling for Tomorrow series). Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results in focus (PISA in Focus). Paris: OECD.
Osborne, R. J., & Wittrock, M. C. (1983). Learning science: A generative process. Science Education, 67(4), 489–508.
Paliwal, R., & Subramaniam, C. N. (2006). Contextualising the curriculum. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 4(1), 25–51.
Perin, D. (2011). Facilitating student learning through contextualization: A review of evidence. Community College Review, 39(3), 268–295.
Polman, J. L., & Hope, J. M. (2014). Science news stories as boundary objects affecting engagement with science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 315–341.
Rivet, A. E., & Krajcik, J. S. (2008). Contextualizing instruction: Leveraging students’ prior knowledge and experiences to foster understanding of middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20203.
Roth, W. M. (2009). Science education from people for people taking a stand(point). New York: Routledge.
Roth, W. M. (2010). ReUniting sociological and psychological perspectives in/for science education: An introduction. In W.-M. Roth (Ed.), Re/structuring science education (Vol. 2, pp. 1–12). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-90-481-3996-5_1.
Roth, W. M., & Désautels, J. (2009). Science education as/for sociopolitical action: Charting the landscape. In Science education from people for people: Taking a standpoint. New York: Routledge.
Sánchez Tapia, I., Krajcik, J., & Reiser, B. (2018). “We do not know what is the real story anymore”: Curricular contextualization principles that support indigenous students in understanding natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(3), 348–376.
Semken, S., & Freeman, C. B. (2008). Sense of place in the practice and assessment of place-based science teaching. Science Education, 92(6), 1042–1057.
Sjöström, J., & Talanquer, V. (2014). Humanizing chemistry education: From simple contextualization to multifaceted problematization. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(8), 1125–1131.
Solano-Flores, G., & Nelson-Barber, S. (2001). On the cultural validity of science assessments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 553–573.
Tolbert, S. (2011). Teaching the content in context: Preparing ‘highly qualified’ and ‘high quality’ teachers for instruction in underserved secondary science classrooms. Ann Arbor: ProQuest LLC.
Tolbert, S., & Knox, C. (2016). ‘They might know a lot of things that I don’t know’: Investigating differences in preservice teachers’ ideas about contextualizing science instruction in multilingual classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 38(7), 1133–1149. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1183266.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological functions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sánchez Tapia, I. (2020). Introduction: A Broad Look at Contextualization of Science Education Across National Contexts. In: Sánchez Tapia, I. (eds) International Perspectives on the Contextualization of Science Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27982-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27982-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27981-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27982-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)