Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Model-Based Human Systems Integration

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Model-Based Systems Engineering

Abstract

Human systems integration (HSI) is an essential field of systems engineering (SE) that emerged, departs, and encompasses from its initial components that are human factors and ergonomics, human-computer interaction, engineering, and domain experience. Current capabilities and maturity of virtual prototyping and human-in-the-loop simulation (HITLS) enable virtual human-centered design (HCD) that can be combined with SE to realize HSI. HSI is almost necessarily model-based; it uses HITLS and requires a homogenized human and machine systemic representation. Virtual HCD enables us to take into account both human and organizational elements not only during the design process but also during the whole life cycle of a system. These new capabilities are made possible by digital tools that enable virtual environments that in turn should be made tangible. Digital twins can be solutions for supporting HSI, operations performance, and experience integration. Tangibility is therefore a crucial concept in model-based HSI (MBHSI), which should be both analytical and experimental, based on appropriate scenarios and performance metrics essentially supported by domain experience. An aeronautical example illustrates an instance of MBHSI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aamodt A, Plaza E (1994) Case-Based Reasoning: Foundational Issues, Methodological Variations, and System Approaches. Artificial Intelligence Communications, 7(1):39–52

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amalberti R (2001) The paradoxes of almost totally safe transportation systems, Safety Science, 37:109–126

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bellet T, Deniel J, Bornard JC, Richard B (2019) Driver Modeling and Simulation to support the Virtual Human Centered Design of future Driving Aids. Proceedings of INCOSE International Conference on Human Systems Integration (HSI2019), Biarritz, France

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berkeley EC, Bobrow DG (eds) (1964) The programming language LISP: Its operation and applications. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bertalanffy L (1968) General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications, Revised ed., New York, NY, USA: Braziller

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boy GA (2020) Human Systems Integration: From Virtual to Tangible. CRC Press – Taylor and Francis Group, USA

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boy GA (2019) Cross-Fertilization of Human-Systems Integration and Artificial Intelligence: Looking for Systemic Flexibility. AI4SE: Artificial Intelligence for Systems Engineering. REUSE, Madrid, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boy GA (2016) Tangible Interactive Systems. Springer, UK

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boy GA (2013) Orchestrating Human-Centered Design. Springer, UK

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boy GA (ed) (2011) Handbook of Human-Machine Interaction: A Human-Centered Design Approach. Ashgate/CRC Press–Taylor and Francis Group, USA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boy GA (1998) Cognitive Function Analysis. Praeger/Ablex, CT, USA

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boy GA, Dezemery J, Hein A, Lu Cong Sang R, Masson D, Morel C, Villeneuve E (2020) PRODEC: Combining Procedural and Declarative Knowledge for Human-Centered Design. FlexTech Technical Report, CentraleSupélec and ESTIA, France

    Google Scholar 

  13. Boy GA, Schmitt KA (2012) Design for Safety: A cognitive engineering approach to the control and management of nuclear power plants. Annals of Nuclear Energy. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2012.08.027

  14. Boy GA, Narkevicius J (2013) Unifying Human Centered Design and Systems Engineering for Human Systems Integration. In: Aiguier M, Boulanger F, Krob D, Marchal C (eds), Complex Systems Design and Management, Springer, U.K. 2014. ISBN-13: 978-3-319-02811-8

    Google Scholar 

  15. Boy GA, Tessier C (1985) Cockpit Analysis and Assessment by the MESSAGE Methodology. Proceedings of the 2nd IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA Conference on Analysis, Design and Evaluation of Man-Machine Systems, Villa-Ponti, Italy, September 10–12. Pergamon Press, Oxford: 73–79

    Google Scholar 

  16. Carpenter TP (1986) Conceptual knowledge as a foundation for procedural knowledge. In: Hiebert J (ed), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 113–132

    Google Scholar 

  17. Caruso P, Dumbacher D, Grieves M (2010) Product Lifecycle Management and the Quest for Sustainable Space Explorations. AIAA SPACE 2010 Conference and Exposition. Anaheim, CA

    Google Scholar 

  18. Corker KM, Smith BR (1993) An architecture and model for cognitive engineering simulation analysis: Application to advanced aviation automation. AIAA Computing in Aerospace 9 Conference. San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  19. Comte A (1865) A General View of Positivism. Translated by Bridges, J.H., Trubner and Co., 1865 (reissued by Cambridge University Press, 2009; ISBN 978-1-108-00064-2

    Google Scholar 

  20. Corbett AT, Anderson JR (1994) Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User modeling and user-adapted interaction, 4(4):253-278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Deitel PJ, Deitel H (2019) Python for Programmers: with Big Data and Artificial Intelligence Case Studies. Pearson Higher Ed, ISBN-13: 978-0135224335

    Google Scholar 

  22. Endsley MR, Jones DG (2011) Designing for Situation Awareness: An Approach to User-Centered Design. CRC Press, 2nd edn. ISBN 978-1420063554

    Google Scholar 

  23. Estefan JA (2008) Survey of Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) Methodologies. INCOSE MBSE Initiative. Rev. B. International Council on Systems Engineering. San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  24. Garcia Belmonte N (2016) Engineering Intelligence Through Data Visualization at Uber. (retrieved on July 29, 2019: https://eng.uber.com/data-viz-intel/)

  25. Glaessgen EH, Stargel D (2012) The digital twin paradigm for future NASA and US Air Force vehicles. AAIA 53rd Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. Honolulu, Hawaii

    Google Scholar 

  26. Grieves M (2016) Origins of the Digital Twin. Concept Working Paper. August. Florida Institute of Technology / NASA. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26367.61609

  27. Hiebert J, Lefevre P (1986) Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge in Mathematics: An Introductory Analysis. In: Hiebert J (ed), Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics, 2: 1–27. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hooey BL, Gore BF, Mahlstedt EA, Foyle DC (2013) Evaluating NextGen Closely Spaced Parallel Operations concepts with validated human performance models: Flight deck guidelines. NASA TM-2013-216506. Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center

    Google Scholar 

  29. Husserl E (1989) Ideas pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Second Book. Trans. R. Rojcewicz and A, Schuwer. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. From the German original unpublished manuscript of 1912, revised 1915, 1928. Known as Ideas II

    Google Scholar 

  30. Husserl E (1963) Ideas: A General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Trans. W. R. Boyce Gibson. Collier Books, New York. From the German original of 1913, originally titled Ideas pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, First Book. Newly translated with the full title by Fred Kersten. Dordrecht and Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1983. Known as Ideas I

    Google Scholar 

  31. International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE), A World in Motion - Systems Engineering Vision 2025, July 2014

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ionesco E (1996) Between life and dream (Entre la vie et le rêve). Interview with C. Bonnefoy. Collection Blanche, Gallimard, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kruchten N (2018) Data visualization for artificial intelligence, and vice versa. (retrieved on July 30, 2019: https://medium.com/@plotlygraphs/data-visualization-for-artificial-intelligence-and-vice-versa-a38869065d88)

  34. Kupferschmid M (2002) Classical Fortran: Programming for Engineering and Scientific Applications. CRC Press. ISBN 978-0-8247-0802-3

    Google Scholar 

  35. Keim D, Andrienko G, Fekete JD, Carsten Görg C, Kohlhammer J, Melançon G (2008) Visual Analytics: Definition, Process and Challenges. In: Kerren A, Stasko JT, Fekete JD, North C., Information Visualization - Human-Centered Issues and Perspectives, Springer: 154–175

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kim SY, Wagner D, Jimenez A (2019) Challenges in Applying Model-Based Systems Engineering: Human-Centered Design Perspective. Proceedings of INCOSE International Conference on Human Systems Integration (HSI2019), Biarritz, France

    Google Scholar 

  37. Laurel B (1991) Computers as Theatre. Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0201550601.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lewicki P, Czyzewska M, Hoffman H (1987) Unconscious acquisition of complex procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(4), 523

    Google Scholar 

  39. Long D, Scott Z (2011) A primer for Model-Based Systems Engineering. Vitech Corporation. ISBN 978-1-105-58810-5

    Google Scholar 

  40. Madni AM, Madni CC, Lucero SD (2019) Leveraging Digital Twin Technology in Model-Based Systems Engineering. Systems. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems7010007

  41. McCormick R (1997) Conceptual and procedural knowledge. International journal of technology and design education, 7(1–2):141-159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. McCracken DD (1961) A Guide to FORTRAN Programming. Wiley, New York. LCCN 61016618

    Google Scholar 

  43. McDermott T, DeLaurentis D, Beling P, Blackburn M, Bone M (2020) AI4SE and SE4AI: A Research Roadmap. InSight Special Feature. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/inst.12278

  44. Minsky M (1986) The Society of Mind. Touchstone Book. Published by Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  45. Muller MJ (2009) Participatory Design: The Third Space in HCI. The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum Assoc: 1061–1081

    Google Scholar 

  46. Nielsen J (1993) Usability Engineering. Academic Press, Boston, MA. Available on amazon.com

  47. Piascik R, Vickers J, Lowry D, Scotti S, Stewart J, Calomino A (2010) Technology Area 12: Materials, Structures, Mechanical Systems, and Manufacturing Road Map. NASA Office of Chief Technologist

    Google Scholar 

  48. White, S.A. (2004). Business Process Modeling Notation. Retrieved on November 23: https://web.archive.org/web/20130818123649/http://www.omg.org/bpmn/Documents/BPMN_V1-0_May_3_2004.pdf

  49. Piaget J (1952) The Origins of Intelligence in Children. New York: Norton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  50. Piaget J (1954) The Construction of Reality in the Child. New York: Ballantine

    Book  Google Scholar 

  51. Prinz P, Crawford T (2015) C in a Nutshell: The Definitive Reference 2nd Edition. Kindle Edition. O'Reilly Media, ASIN: B0197CH96O

    Google Scholar 

  52. Rasmussen J (1983) Skills, rules, knowledge; signals, signs and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Vol. 13:257-266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Reichwein A, Paredis C (2011) Overview of architecture frameworks and modeling languages for model-based systems engineering. In ASME Proceedings: 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  54. Richard JF (1983) Engineering logic versus use logic (Logique de fonctionnement et logique d’utilisation). Research Report, # 202, INRIA, Le Chesnay, France

    Google Scholar 

  55. Russel S, Norvig P (2010) Artificial Intelligence – A Modern Approach. Third Edition. Prentice Hall, Boston, USA. ISBN 978-0-13-604259-4

    Google Scholar 

  56. Schneider M, Rittle-Johnson B, Star JR (2011) Relations among conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge, and procedural flexibility in two samples differing in prior knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. White, S.A. & Bock, C. (2011). BPMN 2.0 Handbook Second Edition: Methods, Concepts, Case Studies and Standards in Business Process Management Notation. Future Strategies Inc. ISBN 978-0-9849764-0-9.

    Google Scholar 

  58. SEBoK (2020) Guide to the Systems Engineering Book of Knowledge (retrieved on 5 May 2020: https://www.sebokwiki.org/wiki/What_is_a_System%3F)

  59. Simon HA, Newell A (1971) Human problem solving: The state of the theory in 1970. American Psychologist, 26(2), pp. 145-159. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Star JR (2005) Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge. Journal for research in mathematics education: 404–411

    Google Scholar 

  61. St. Amant R, Healey CG, Riedl M, Kocherlakota S, Pegram DA, Torhola M (2001) Intelligent visualization in a planning simulation. Proceedings Intelligent User Interfaces IUI’01). Santa Fe, New Mexico. ACM. 1-58113-325-1/01/0001

    Google Scholar 

  62. Tuegel EJ, Ingraffea AR, Eason TG, Spottswood SM (2011) Reengineering Aircraft Structural Life Prediction Using a Digital Twin. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering

    Google Scholar 

  63. Willingham DB, Nissen MJ, Bullemer P (1989) On the development of procedural knowledge. Journal of experimental psychology: learning, memory, and cognition, 15(6), 1047

    Google Scholar 

  64. Wilson RA, Keil FC (eds) (2001) The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. USA

    Google Scholar 

  65. Winograd T, Flores F (1986) Understanding Computers and Cognition: a new foundation for design. Initially published by Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ. Now Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA, USA. ISBN 978-0-201-11297-9

    Google Scholar 

  66. Wirth N (1971) The Programming Language Pascal. Acta Informatica, Volume 1:35–63

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CentraleSupélec, Paris Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France

    Guy André Boy

  2. ESTIA Institute of Technology, Bidart, France

    Guy André Boy

Authors
  1. Guy André Boy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guy André Boy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Azad M. Madni

  2. Lockheed Martin (United States), Bethesda, MD, USA

    Norman Augustine

  3. University of Southern California, Los Angelies, CA, USA

    Michael Sievers

Section Editor information

  1. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Michael W. Sievers

  2. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, USA

    Jeff Estefan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Boy, G.A. (2022). Model-Based Human Systems Integration. In: Madni, A.M., Augustine, N., Sievers, M. (eds) Handbook of Model-Based Systems Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27486-3_28-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27486-3_28-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27486-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27486-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation