Abstract
The Arctic is prominent in the history of the International Maritime Organization (IMO), following the RMS Titanic disaster in 1912 and soon signing in London of the Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea in 1914. Eighty years later, the IMO initiated a process to manage shipping in ice-covered oceans. In concert with the IMO Guidelines for Ships Operating in Arctic Ice-Covered Waters in 2002 and their 2004 release of the Arctic 2004 Arctic Climate Impact Assessment, the Arctic Council initiated the Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment (AMSA), which issued its final report in 2009. The goal of this chapter is to build on AMSA as a case study of informed decisionmaking through the steps of questions to generate data, which are then integrated into evidence to reveal options (without advocacy), informing decisions by relevant institutions to address a ‘continuum of urgencies’ that involve shipping in the new Arctic Ocean with its transformed sea-ice cap, assessing whether shipping is increasing as sea ice is decreasing (‘ship-ice hypothesis’). Primary sources of data for AMSA involved ship tracking from ground-station Automatic Identification System (AIS), shore-based radar systems and details of fishing vessels as well as other smaller ships provided by the Arctic nations. However, Arctic ship traffic fundamentally changed the year of the AMSA report, when satellite AIS records began providing continuous, synoptic, pan-Arctic coverage of individual ships with data pulsed over seconds to minutes. This chapter reveals the oldest and longest continuous satellite AIS record (from 1 September 2009 through 31 December 2016), applying the ‘spacetime cube’ (which also was unavailable during AMSA) with more than 120,000,000 satellite AIS messages from SpaceQuest Ltd. to begin addressing synoptic questions with any level of granularity from points to regions to pan-Arctic over time. Future questions can be considered to assess ship attributes (including vessel flag state, size and type) in view of biophysical and socio-economic variables, recognizing that shipping and sea ice are recognized as primary drivers of change in the Arctic Ocean. Contributions to these assessments come from all areas of science (inclusively defined as the study of change), across the natural and social sciences with Indigenous knowledge in an holistic (international, interdisciplinary and inclusive) manner to achieve Arctic sustainability across generations. As a practical outcome in a user-defined manner, this chapter reveals characteristics of next-generation Arctic marine shipping assessments, revealing patterns and trends that can be applied to informed decisionmaking about the governance mechanisms and built infrastructure as well as operations for multilateral stability and sustainable development in the new Arctic Ocean.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ACIA (2004) Impacts of a warming climate: Arctic climate impact assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. http://www.amap.no/arctic-climate-impact-assessment-acia
AMAP (2017a) Adaptation actions for a changing Arctic: perspectives from the Barents area. Adaptation Actions for a Changing Arctic, Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme Oslo, pp 267. https://www.amap.no/documents/doc/Adaptation-Actions-for-a-Changing-Arctic-Perspectives-from-the-Barents-Area/1604
AMAP (2017b) Adaptation actions for a changing Arctic: perspectives from the Bering-Chukchi-Beaufort region. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme. Oslo, pp 255. https://www.amap.no/documents/doc/Adaptation-Actions-for-a-Changing-Arctic-AACA-BeringChukchiBeaufort-Region-Overview-report/1531
AMSA (2009a) Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment Report. Protection of the Arctic marine environment (PAME) working group of the Arctic council, Akureyri. https://pame.is/index.php/projects/arctic-marine-shipping/amsa
AMSA (2009b) Arctic Marine Activity Database for the Circumpolar North Region 2004: overview of Methodologies and Data Development. Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment (PAME) Working Group of the Arctic Council, Akureyri
AMSP (2004) Arctic Marine Strategic Plan. [updated 2015–2025]. Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment (PAME) Working Group of the Arctic Council, Akureyri. https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/71
Arctic Options (2014) Workshop on integrated policy options for the Bering Strait region. Convened by the Arctic Options: Holistic Integration for Arctic Coastal-Marine Sustainability project from October 20–24, 2014. University of California, Santa Barbara, p 71. http://panarcticoptions.org//wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Final_Bering-Strait-Workshop-Report_13JUN15.pdf
Arctic Science Agreement (2017) Agreement on enhancing international Arctic scientific cooperation. Signed 11 May 2017. Fairbanks. http://www.arctic-council.org/index.php/en/our-work/agreements
ASTD (2017) Arctic Ship Traffic Data (ASTD) project. Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment (PAME) working group of the Arctic council and Norwegian coastal administration. https://pame.is/index.php/projects/arctic-marine-shipping/astd
Beckman RC, Henrikson T, Kraabel KD, Molenaar EJ, Roach JA (eds) (2017) Governance of Arctic shipping: balancing rights and interests of Arctic States and User States. Brill Nitjhoff
Berkman PA (2015) Institutional dimensions of sustaining Arctic observing networks (SAON). Arctic 68(SUPPL):1–11. https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic4499
Berkman PA, Vylegzhanin AN (eds) (2013) Environmental security in the Arctic Ocean. Springer, Berlin, pp 241–254. http://www.springer.com/us/book/9789400747128
Berkman PA, Vylegzhanin AN, Young OR (2016) Governing the Bering Strait region: current status, emerging issues and future options. Ocean Development and International Law 47(2):186–217
Berkman PA, Kullerud L, Pope A, Vylegzhanin AN, Young OR (2017) The Arctic science agreement propels science diplomacy. Science 358:596–698. http://sites.tufts.edu/sciencediplomacy/policy-forum
Bourbonnais P, Lasserre F (2015) Winter shipping in the Canadian Arctic, toward year-round traffic? Polar Geogr 38(1):70–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2015.1006298
Brigham LW (2011) The challenges and security issues of Arctic marine transport. In: Kraska J (ed) Arctic security in an age of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 20–32
Brigham LW (2017) The Changing Maritime Arctic and New Marine Operations. In: Beckman RC, Henrikson T, Kraabel KD, Molenaar EJ, Roach JA (eds) Governance of Arctic shipping: Balancing Rights and Interests of Arctic States and User States. Brill Nitjhoff, Leiden, pp 3–23
Burzigotti P, Ginesi A, Colavolpe G (2010) Advanced receiver design for satellite-based AIS signal detection. In: 5th advanced satellite multimedia systems conference and the 11th signal processing for space communications workshop. Cagliari
China (2017) Belt and Road Initiative. National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China, with State Council authorization. 28 March 2017. http://english.gov.cn/archive/publications/2015/03/30/content_281475080249035.htm
China (2018) China’s Arctic policy. State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China. 26 January 2018. http://www.scio.gov.cn/zfbps/32832/Document/1618243/1618243.htm
Darby M (2018) Shipping first as commercial tanker cross Arctic Sea route in winter. The Guardian, 13 February 2018
Deggim H (2013) Ensuring safe, secure and reliable shipping in the Arctic Ocean. In: Berkman PA, Vylegzhanin AN (eds) Environmental Security in the Arctic Ocean. Springer, Berlin, pp 241–254. http://www.springer.com/us/book/9789400747128
Eger KM (2011) Marine traffic in the Arctic. A Report Commissioned by the Norwegian Mapping Authority. Analyse & Strategi, Oslo. https://www.iho.int/mtg_docs/rhc/ArHC/ArHC2/ARHC2-04C_Marine_Traffic_in_the_Arctic_2011.pdf
Eguíluz VM, Fernández-Gracia J, Irigoien X, Duarte CM (2016) A quantitative assessment of Arctic shipping in 2010–2014. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30682:1–6
Emerson C, Lahn G (2012) Arctic opening – opportunity and risk in the high north. Lloyds, London. https://www.lloyds.com/news-and-insight/risk-insight/library/natural-environment/arctic-report-2012
ESA (2017) Sentinel-1. European Space Agency. Paris. http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Observing_the_Earth/Copernicus/Sentinel-1
ESRI (2017) Create space time cube by aggregating points. Environmental Systems Research Institute. http://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/space-time-pattern-mining/create-space-time-cube.htm
Eucker W (2011) A Geospatial analysis of Arctic Marine Traffic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
exactEarth (2017). http://exactearth.com/
Finland (2014) Workshop on Safe Ship Operations in the Arctic Ocean. IMO Headquarters, London, 28 February 2014. International Maritime Organization, Maritime Safety Committee, Information Paper. Agenda Item 10. MSC 93/INF.12. http://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/polar/Pages/Arctic-Safe-Ship-Operations-Workshop-(2014).aspx
Flightrader24 (2017) Plane tracking system. https://www.flightradar24.com/
Google (2017) BigQuery. https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/
HAVBASE (2017) System for the statistical maritime surveillance of ship traffic. Norwegian Coastal Administration. http://kystverket.no/Maritime-tjenester/Geoportal/Kartlosninger/Havbase/
IMO (2002) Guidelines for Ships Operating in Arctic Ice-Covered Waters. Marine Environmental Protection Committee MSC/Circ.1056 MEPC/Circ.399. International Maritime Organization. http://www.gc.noaa.gov/documents/gcil_1056-MEPC-Circ399.pdf
IMO (2009) Guidelines for ships operating in polar waters. Resolution A.1024(26). International Maritime Organization. http://www.imo.org/blast/blastDataHelper.asp?data_id=29985&filename=A1024%2826%29.pdf
IMO (2017a) Introduction to IMO. International Maritime Organization. http://www.imo.org/en/About/
IMO (2017b) International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Waters (Polar Code). Marine Environmental Protection Committee, MEPC 68/21/Add. 1, Annex 10. International Maritime Organization. Entry into Force 1 January 2017. http://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/polar/Pages/default.aspx
IMO (2017c) Routeing measures and mandatory ship reporting systems. Establishment of two-way routes and precautionary areas in the Bering Sea and Bering Strait. International Maritime Organization, Sub-Committee on Navigation, Communications and Search and Rescue. https://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pdf/IMO/NCSR_5_3_7.pdf
ITU (2019) Table of maritime identification digits. International Telecommunications Union. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-R/terrestrial/fmd/Pages/mid.aspx
Kystverket (2017) Automatic identification system (AIS). Norwegian Coastal Administration. http://www.kystverket.no/AIS
Lakshmi SA (2018) Maersk Tests Russian Arctic Route. MarineLink. 29 September 2018. https://www.marinelink.com/news/maersk-tests-russian-arctic-route-442025
Langdalen H (2017) Analysing emission reducing measures for shuttle tankers based on autonomous identification system data. Masters thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim. https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2465620/17252_FULLTEXT.pdf?sequence=1
Leetaru K (2018) Google’s BigQuery brings GIS into the Petascale era. Forbes 12 October 2018. https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2018/10/12/googles-bigquery-brings-gis-into-the-petascale-era/#eabbea979b91
Lloyds (2017) Lloyds register of ships. https://www.ihs.com/products/maritime-ships-register.html
MARPOL (1973) International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships. Signed 2 November 1973, London [as modified by the Protocol of 1978]. Entry into Force 2 October 1983. http://www.imo.org/en/about/conventions/listofconventions/pages/international-convention-for-the-prevention-of-pollution-from-ships-(marpol).aspx
Melia N, Haines K, Hawkins E, Day JJ (2017) Towards seasonal Arctic shipping route predictions. Environ Res Lett 12:084005. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7a60/meta
Mjelde A, Martinsen K, Eide M, Endresen Ø (2014) Environmental accounting for Arctic shipping – a framework building on ship tracking data from satellites. Mar Pollut Bull 87:22–28. https://docslide.com.br/documents/environmental-accounting-for-arctic-shipping-a-framework-building-on-ship.html
MOPP (2013) Agreement on Cooperation on Marine Oil Pollution Preparedness and Response in the Arctic. Signed 15 May 2013. Kiruna. Entry into force 24 March 2016. http://www.arctic-council.org/index.php/en/our-work/agreements
MXAK (2017) Marine Exchange of Alaska. http://www.mxak.org
NAVCEN (2017) Navigation Center: AIS Messages. United States Coast Guard. https://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=AISMessages
NGA (2017a) Publication 155. (Enroute) sailing directions. East Coast of Russia. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. Springfield. https://msi.nga.mil/MSISiteContent/StaticFiles/NAV_PUBS/SD/Pub155/Pub155bk.pdf
NGA (2017b) Publication 180. (Enroute) sailing directions. Arctic Ocean. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency Springfield. https://msi.nga.mil/MSISiteContent/StaticFiles/NAV_PUBS/SD/Pub180/Pub180bk.pdf
NGA (2017c) Publication 181. (Enroute) sailing directions. Greenland and Iceland. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. Springfield. https://msi.nga.mil/MSISiteContent/StaticFiles/NAV_PUBS/SD/Pub181/Pub181bk.pdf
NGA (2017d) Publication 182. (Enroute) Sailing Directions. North and west coasts of Norway. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency Springfield. https://msi.nga.mil/MSISiteContent/StaticFiles/NAV_PUBS/SD/Pub182/Pub182bk.pdf
NGA (2017e) Publication 183. (Enroute) sailing directions. North coast of Russia. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. Springfield. https://msi.nga.mil/MSISiteContent/StaticFiles/NAV_PUBS/SD/Pub183/Pub183bk.pdf
Norway (2015) Update of the integrated management plan for the Barents Sea–Lofoten area including an update of the delimitation of the marginal ice zone Meld. St. 20 (2014–2015), Report to the Storting (white paper). Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment, Oslo. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/d6743df219c74ea198e50d9778720e5a/en-gb/pdfs/stm201420150020000engpdfs.pdf
NSIDC (2017) Arctic Sea-Ice News and Analysis. National Snow and ice data Center. http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/
Nyseth H, Bertelsen K (2014) Ice classes in brief. DNV-GL. http://www.dnvgl.com
OGA (2007) Oil and gas assessment (OGA). Arctic monitoring and assessment programme (AMAP) working Group of the Arctic Council, Oslo. https://www.amap.no/oil-and-gas-assessment-oga
Onoda M, Young OR (eds) (2018) Satellite earth observations and their impact on society and policy. Springer
Østreng W, Eger KM, Fløistad B, Jørgensen-Dahl A, Lothe L, Mejlaender-Larsen M, Wergeland T (2013) Shipping in Arctic waters: a comparison of the northeast, northwest and trans-polar passages. Springer, Berlin
Ottawa Declaration (1996) Declaration on the establishment of the Arctic Council. Signed 19 September 1996, Ottawa. https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/85
PAME (2017) PAME II-2017 – agenda item 5.8 Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment (AMSA) recommendations – review and update. http://www.arctic-council.org/index.php/en/our-work2/8-news-and-events/351-following-up-on-the-arctic-marine-shipping-assessment
PIOMAS (2017) Sea-ice volume reanalysis. Pan-Arctic Ice Ocean Modeling and Assimilation System (PIOMAS), University of Washington. http://psc.apl.uw.edu/research/projects/arctic-sea-ice-volume-anomaly/; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1d3fFHXxZY
Raymond-Yakoubian J (2018) Arctic vessel traffic and indigenous communities in the Bering Strait region of Alaska. In: Hildebrand L, Brigham L, Johansson T (eds) Sustainable shipping in a changing Arctic. WMU studies in maritime affairs, vol 7. Springer, Cham, pp 275–295
SAR (2011) Agreement on Cooperation on Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue in the Arctic. Signed 12 May 2011. Nuuk. Entry into Force 19 January 2013. http://www.arctic-council.org/index.php/en/our-work/agreements
Serkez Y, Rigdon R, Paris C (2018) The future of Arctic shipping. Wall St. J. 24 October 2018. https://www.wsj.com/graphics/the-future-of-arctic-shipping/
Smith LC, Stephenson SR (2013) New trans-Arctic Shipping routes navigable by Midcentury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(13):E1191–E1195
SOLAS (1914) Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea. Signed 24 January 1914, London. Entry into Force 1 July 1915. http://www.imo.org/en/KnowledgeCentre/ReferencesAndArchives/HistoryofSOLAS/Documents/SOLAS%201914.pdf
SOLAS (1974) International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea. Signed 1 November 1974, London. Entry into Force 25 May 1980. http://www.imo.org/en/About/conventions/listofconventions/pages/international-convention-for-the-safety-of-life-at-sea-(solas),-1974.aspx
SpaceQuest (2017). http://www.spacequest.com/
STCW (1978) International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers. Signed 7 July 1978, London Entry into force: 28 April 1984. http://www.imo.org/en/KnowledgeCentre/informationresourcesoncurrenttopics/informationresourcesoncurrenttopicsarchives/documents/stcw.pdf
Stevenson TC, Davies J, Huntington HP, Sheard W (2018) An examination of trans-Arctic vessel routing in the Central Arctic Ocean. Mar Policy 100:83–89
Stoddard MA, Etienne L, Fournier M, Pelot R, Beveridge L (2016). Making sense of Arctic maritime traffic using the Polar Operational Limits Assessment Risk Indexing System (POLARIS). IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 34. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/34/1/012034/pdf
Struzik E (2018) As ice recedes, the Arctic isn’t prepared for more shipping traffic. The Conversation. 4 September 2018. https://theconversation.com/as-ice-recedes-the-arctic-isnt-prepared-for-more-shipping-traffic-102312
UNCLOS (1982) United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Signed 10 December 1982, Montego Bay. Entry Into Force 16 November 1994. http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf
USCG (2019) Maritime Mobile Service Identity. United States Coast Guard https://www.navcen.uscg.gov/index.php?pageName=mtMmsi
VTS (2017) The Vardø vessel traffic service. Norwegian Coastal Administration. http://www.kystverket.no/globalassets/om-kystverket/brosjyrer/vardovtsbrosjyre_en_hr.pdf
Vylegzhanin AN, Young OR, Berkman PA (2018) Governing the Barents Sea region: current status, emerging issues, and future options. Ocean Dev Int Law 49(1). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00908320.2017.1365545
WGS (1984) World geodetic system 1984 (WGS84). National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. https://www.nga.mil/productsservices/geodesyandgeophysics/pages/worldgeodeticsystem.aspx
Young OR (2002) Institutional interplay: the environmental consequences of cross-scale interactions. Chapter 8. In: Olstrom E, Dietz T, Dolšak N, Stern PC, Stonich S, Weber EU (eds) Drama of the commons. National Academy Press, pp 263–292
Acknowledgements
This paper is a product of the Science Diplomacy Center at Tufts University in the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy with support from the National Science Foundation (Award Nos. NSF-OPP 1263819 and NSF-ICER 1660449) and the Belmont Forum with collaboration among funding agencies in Canada, China, France, Norway, Russian Federation and the United States.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Berkman, P.A., Fiske, G., Røyset, JA., Brigham, L.W., Lorenzini, D. (2020). Next-Generation Arctic Marine Shipping Assessments. In: Young, O., Berkman, P., Vylegzhanin, A. (eds) Governing Arctic Seas: Regional Lessons from the Bering Strait and Barents Sea. Informed Decisionmaking for Sustainability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25674-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25674-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25673-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25674-6
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)