Abstract
The choice justification of the engineering products concept is carried out on the basis of their quality indicators comparison for various designs including the consumers requirements and expectations, as well as the products of competitors. The various studies main focus is made on the development and application of multi-criteria methods for finding optimal and rational solutions. This paper is devoted to justifying the choice of indicators by which further comparison of alternative options will be made, that is, to the criteria system formation itself. The basis of the quality indicators system formation for engineering products is the relationships setting between their properties, the life cycle stages, and strategies for the implementation of these stages. A method for substantiating the quality indicators system choice which can be used in the qualimetrical differential and complex assessment of the of product quality level is presented. The practical implementation of the methodology for designing a gear pump range with the foundations of the quality indicators selection is considered. The enterprise strategic development plan was developed at the preparation of new products release using the developed methodology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Taura T, Yoshikawa H (1994) Managing function concepts in the design process. In: Management of design: engineering and management perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1390-8_10
Zadnik Z, Karakasic M, Kljajin M et al (2009) Function and functionality in the conceptual design process. StrojniskiVestnik J Mech Eng 55(7–8):455–471
Azgaldov GG, Kostin AV (2011) Applied qualimetry: its origins, errors and misconceptions. Benchmark Inter J 18(3):428–444
Azgaldov GG, Kostin AV, Sadovov VV (2012) Kvalimetriyadlyavsekh (Qualimetry for all). Informznanie, Moscow
Azgaldov GG, Kostin AV, Padilla Omiste AE (2015) The ABC of qualimetry: the toolkit for measuring immeasurable. Ridero, Yekaterinburg
GOST (State Standard) 4.118–84 (1984) Product reliability index system. Pumping equipment. Basic index nomenclature. USSR State Committee on Standards, Moscow
Ivakhnenko EA, Oleinik AV, Chervyakov LM (2017) Improvement of the design process of an engineering product concept. News of the Tula state university. Tech Sci 8(1):313–323
Ivakhnenko EA, Zotov IV, Chervyakov LM (2018) Substantiation choice engineering produce quality indices at adopted strategies of stage realization of their life cycle. https://doi.org/10.30987/article_5bf3cb4d183e11.06361598
Oleinik AV (2005) Creation of competitive mechanical engineering products: the environmental aspect. Publishing House of Kursk State Technical University, Kursk
Allenby BR (1991) Design for environment: a tool whose time has come. SSA J 12(9):5–9
Telenko C, Seepersad CC, Webber ME (2008) A compilation of design for environment principles and guidelines. In: Proceedings of the ASME international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, New York, pp 3–6
Oehlberg L, Bayley C, Hartman C et al (2012) Mapping the life cycle analysis and sustainability impact of design for environment principles. In: Dornfeld D, Linke B (eds) Leveraging technology for a sustainable world, Berlin, Heidelberg
Kampfer C, Seiler TB, Beger AL (2017) Life cycle assessment sustainable engineering context near net shape grown components: striving towards a sustainable way of future production. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-017-0125-x
Owen CL (1993) Design for integrity. Institute of Design Communications Center, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago
Boothroyd G, Dewhurst P, Knight P (2002) Product design for manufacture and assembly, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York
Chiu M-C, Okudan GE (2010) Evolution of design for X tools applicable to design stages: a literature review. https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2010-29091
Dombrowski U, Schmidt S, Schmidtchen K (2014) Analysis and integration of design for X approaches in lean design as basis for a lifecycle optimized product design. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.023
Baptista AJ, Peixoto D, Ferreira AD et al (2018) Lean design-for-X methodology: integrating modular design, structural optimization and ecodesign in a machine tool case study. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.003
GOST (State Standard) 19027–89 (1989) Gear pumps. Basic parameters. Standards Publishing, Moscow
Abrasive-free ultrasonic finishing processing (BUFO), ultrasonic pulse hardening-finishing processing (2018) LLC Ultrasonic technique—INLAB, Saint-Petersburg. http://www.utinlab.ru/articles/bezabrazivnaya-ultrazvukovaya-finishnaya-obrabotka-bufo-ultrazvukovaya-impulsnaya-uprochnyayucshe-chistovaya-obrabotka. Accessed 10 Oct 2018
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ivakhnenko, E.A., Chervyakov, L.M., Erenkov, O.Y. (2020). Formation of Quality Indicators System at Design of Mechanical Engineering Products. In: Radionov, A., Kravchenko, O., Guzeev, V., Rozhdestvenskiy, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Industrial Engineering (ICIE 2019). ICIE 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22041-9_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22041-9_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22040-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22041-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)