Skip to main content

Robotic Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 753 Accesses

Abstract

This article explains robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) by demonstrating the need for this technique and outlining a reproducible procedure. This text lays out step-by-step instructions on how a surgeon and team can carry out robotic TAMIS including what personnel and equipment are necessary to perform robotic TAMIS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Althumairi AA, Gearhart SL. Local excision for early rectal cancer: transanal endoscopic microsurgery and beyond. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015;6:296–306.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hakiman H, Michael M, Fleshman JW. Replacing transanal excision with transanal endoscopic microsurgery and/or transanal minimally invasive surgery for early rectal cancer. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2015;28:38–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Classic articles in colonic and rectal surgery. Jacques Lisfranc 1790–1847. Observation on a cancerous condition of the rectum treated by excision. Dis Colon Rectum. 1983;26:694–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Colorectal cancer facts & figures 2014–2016. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2014. https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/all-cancer-facts-figures/cancer-facts-figures-2014.html.

  5. Colorectal cancer facts & figures 2017–2019. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2017. https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/all-cancer-facts-figures/cancer-facts-figures-2017.html.

  6. Willingham FF, Brugge WR. Taking NOTES: translumenal flexible endoscopy and endoscopic surgery. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2007;23:550–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Flora ED, Wilson TG, Martin IJ, et al. A review of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for intra-abdominal surgery experimental models, techniques, and applicability to the clinical setting. Ann Surg. 2008;247:583–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakamura T, Mitomi H, Ihara A, et al. Risk factors for wound infection after surgery for colorectal cancer. World J Surg. 2008;32:1138–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Noura S, Ohue M, Miyoshi N, et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) with a GelPOINT® Path for lower rectal cancer as an alternative to transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Mol Clin Oncol. 2016;5:148–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Endreseth BH, Myrvold HE, Romundstad P, et al. Transanal excision vs. major surgery for T1 rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1380–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Garcia-Aguilar J, Mellgren A, Sirivongs P, et al. Local excision of rectal cancer without adjuvant therapy: a word of caution. Ann Surg. 2000;231:345–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Buess G, Kipfmuller K, Ibald R, et al. Clinical results of transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc. 1988;2:245–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gill S, Stetler JL, Patel A, et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS)- standardizing a reproducible procedure. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19:1528–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McLemore EC, Weston LA, Coker AM, et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery for benign and malignant rectal neoplasia. Am J Surg. 2014;208:372–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S. Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2200–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Martin-Perez B, Andrade-Ribeiro GD, Hunter L, et al. A systematic review of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) from 2010 to 2013. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18:775–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ortiz-Oshiro E, Sánchez-Egido I, Moreno-Sierra J, et al. Robotic assistance may reduce conversion to open in rectal carcinoma laparoscopic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Robot. 2012;8:360–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jiménez Rodríguez RM, Díaz Pavón JM, de La Portilla de Juan F, et al. Prospective randomised study: robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer resection. Cir Esp. 2011;89:432–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hahnloser D, Cantero R, Salgado G, et al. Transanal minimal invasive surgery for rectal lesions: should the defect be closed? Color Dis. 2015;17:397–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hompes R, Rauh SM, Hagen ME, et al. Preclinical cadaveric study of transanal endoscopic da Vinci® surgery. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1144–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Atallah S, Quinteros F, Martin-Perez B, et al. Robotic transanal surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasms. J Robotic Surg. 2014;8:193–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zimmern A, Prasad L, Desouza A, et al. Robotic colon and rectal surgery: a series of 131 cases. World J Surg. 2010;34:1954–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mirnezami AH, Mirnezami R, Venkatasubramaniam AK, et al. Robotic colorectal surgery: hype or new hope? A systematic review of robotics in colorectal surgery. Color Dis. 2010;12:1084–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hompes R, Rauh SM, Ris F, et al. Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasms. Br J Surg. 2014;101:578–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sumrien H, Dadnam C, Hewitt J, et al. Feasibility of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for rectal tumours and its impact on quality of life – the bristol series. Anticancer Res. 2016;36:2005–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ramirez JM, Aguilella V, Arribas D, et al. Transanal full-thickness excision of rectal tumours: should the defect be sutured? a randomized controlled trial. Color Dis. 2002;4:51–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Clermonts SH, Zimmerman DD. Closure of the rectal defect after transanal minimally invasive surgery: a word of caution. Color Dis. 2015;17:642–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Craig S. Johnson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Electronic Supplementary Material

Initial robotic TAMIS setup using the gel point path (MP4 410460 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Johnson, C.S., Johnson, M.W. (2020). Robotic Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS). In: Kim, J., Garcia-Aguilar, J. (eds) Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques for Cancers of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18740-8_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18740-8_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18739-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18740-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics