Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Digitization and Media Policy Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Methods for Media Policy Research

Abstract

This chapter discusses emerging methodological trends in media policy research. Setting out from several weaknesses of research to date, it identifies the use of digital methods and participatory approaches as two areas of ongoing renewal. Digital methods concern both digitized existing methods such as document analysis and digitally native methods such as scraping. The chapter highlights the value of new techniques to tackle issues such as fake news, data protection, further ownership concentration, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Avison, D., Baskerville, R., & Myers, M. (2001). Controlling action research projects. Information, Technology & People, 14(1), 28–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Back, L., & Puwar, N. (2012). A manifesto for live methods: Provocations and capacities. The Sociological Review, 60, 6–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, F., MacDougall, C., & Smith, D. (2006). Participatory action research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 854–857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechmann, A. (2013). Internet profiling: The economy of data intraoperability on Facebook and Google. Mediekultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 29(55), 72–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer, D. (2014). Punk sociology. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beraldo, D., & Galan-Paez, J. (2013). The #OCCUPY network on Twitter and the challenges to social movements theory and research. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1504/ijeg.2013.060646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, G., & Peerson, A. (2009). Giving young Emirati women a voice: Participatory action research on physical activity. Health & Place, 15, 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilic, P., & Svob-Dokic, N. (2016). The pendulum model of Croatian media policy: Digitalisation between public interests and market competition. European Journal of Communication, 31(5), 503–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogner, A., & Menz, W. (2009). The theory-generating expert interview: Epistemological interest, forms of knowledge, interaction. In A. Bogner, B. Littig, & W. Menz (Eds.), Interviewing experts (pp. 43–80). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buts, C., Langenus, M., & Donders, K. (2017). Is there a role for economic analysis when deciding on state aid to public broadcasters? European State Aid Law Quarterly, 4, 537–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N., Fotopoulou, A., & Dickens, L. (2016). Real social analytics: A contribution towards a phenomenology of a digital world. The British Journal of Sociology, 67(1), 118–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donders, K. (2012). Public service media and policy in Europe. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Donders, K. (2015). State aid to public service media: European Commission decisional practice before and after the 2009 broadcasting communication. European State Aid Law Quarterly, 15(1), 68–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donders, K., & Raats, T. (2012). Analyzing national practices after European state aid control: Are multi-stakeholder negotiations beneficial for public service broadcasting? Media, Culture and Society, 34(2), 162–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donders, K., & Van den Bulck, H. (2016). Decline and fall of public service media values in the international content acquisition market: An analysis of small public broadcasters acquiring BBC Worldwide content. European Journal of Communication, 31(3), 299–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, D. (2016). How children represent sustainable consumption through participatory action research and co-design of visual narratives. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40, 562–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorussen, H., Lenz, H., & Blavoukos, S. (2005). Assessing the realibility and validity of expert interviews. European Union Politics, 6, 315–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, G. (2007). Undermining media diversity: Inaction on media concentrations and pluralism in the EU. European Studies: A Journal of European Culture, History and Politics, 24(1), 135–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evens, T., & Donders, K. (2018). Platform power and policy in transforming television markets. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Felt, M. (2016). Social media and the social sciences: How researchers employ big data analytics. Big Data & Society, 3(1). http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2053951716645828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D. (2010). Media policy silences: The hidden face of communications decision making. International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(3), 344–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D. (2014). The contradictions of media power. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R., & Maybin, J. (2011). Documents, practices and policy. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 7(2), 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garde, A. (2011). Advertising regulation and the protection of children’s consumers in the European Union: In the best interests of … commercial operators. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 19, 523–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giardullo, P. (2016). Does ‘bigger’ mean ‘better’? Pitfalls and shortcuts associated with big data for social research. Quality & Quantity, 50(2), 529–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, M., Kennedy, H., Stylianos, M., & Birchall, C. (2015). Knowing your publics: The use of social media analytics in local government. Information Polity, 20(4), 287–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginosar, A., & Levi-Faur, D. (2010). Regulating product placement in the European Union and Canada: Explaining regime change and diversity. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 12(5), 467–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hand, M., & Hillyard, S. (2014). Big data? Qualitative approaches to digital research. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, C., & Karppinen, K. (2014). Policy streams and public service media funding reforms in Germany and Finland. European Journal of Communication, 29(4), 416–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Highfield, T., & Leaver, T. (2015). Instagrammatics and digital methods: Studying visual social media from selfies and GIFs to memes and emoji. Communication Research and Practice, 2(1), 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Just, N., & Puppis, M. (2012). Communication policy research: Looking back, moving forward. In N. Just & M. Puppis (Eds.), Trends in communication policy research: New theories, methods and subjects (pp. 9–29). Bristol, UK: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpinnen, K., & Moe, H. (2011). What we talk about when we talk about document analysis. In N. Just & M. Puppis (Eds.), Trends in communication policy research: New theories, methods and subjects (pp. 159–173). Bristol, UK: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, H., Moss, G., Birchall, C., & Moshonas, S. (2015). Balancing the potential and problems of digital methods through action research: Methodological reflections. Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 172–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, D. (2016). The social construction of computational surveillance: Reclaiming agency in a computed world. Thesis for the degree of doctor in sociology, London School of Economics, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S., & Brinkman, S. (2009). Interviewing: Learning the craft of qualitative interviewing. London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, G. F., & Martin, F. (2014). The value in public service media (edited collection). Göteborg, Norway: Nordicom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariën, I., Baelden, D., Bens, J., Schurmans, D., Van Audenhove, L., Smukste, K., … Goubin, E. (2013). Van digitale naar maatschappelijke participatie: Opportuniteiten en uitdagingen. In M. Callens, J. Noppe, & L. Vanderleyden (Eds.), De sociale staat van Vlaanderen. Brussels, Belgium: Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalis, M. (2007). Governing European communications: From unification to coordination. Lanham, UK: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M., & Tambini, D. (2018). Digital dominance: The power of Google, Amazon, Facebook and Apple (edited collection). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieminen, H. (2016). A radical democratic reform of media regulation in response to three levels of crisis. Javnost—The Public, 23(1), 56–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ots, M., Krumsvik, A. H., Ala-Fossi, M., & Rendahl, P. (2016). The shifting role of value-added tax (VAT) as a media policy tool: A three-country comparison of political justifications. Javnost—The Public, 23(2), 170–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, C., & Donders, K. (2011). Let’s get digital. From television without frontiers to the digital big bang: The EU’s continuous efforts to create a future proof internal media market. In R. Mansell & M. Raboy (Eds.), Media and communications policies in a globalised context (pp. 525–542). New York: Maxwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puppis, M. (2010). Media governance: A new concept for the analysis of media policy and regulation. Communication Culture & Critique, 3(2), 134–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puppis, M., Simpson, S., & Van den Bulck, H. (2016). Contextualizing European media policy in the twenty-first century. In S. Simpson, M. Puppis, & H. Van den Bulck (Eds.), European media policy for the twenty-first century (pp. 1–22). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raats, T., Evens, T., Vanhaeght, A.-S., Ruelens, S., & Loisen, J. (2015). Stakeholderbevraging ter voorbereiding van de nieuwe beheersovereenkomst van de VRT met de Vlaamse Regering. Brussels, Belgium: imec-SMIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathbun, B. C. (2008). Interviewing and qualitative field methods: Pragmatism and practicalities. In J. M. Box-Steffensmeier & D. Collier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political methodology (pp. 685–701). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieder, B., Abdulla, R., Poell, T., Woltering, R., & Zack, L. (2015). Data critique and analytical opportunities for very large Facebook pages: Lessons learned from exploring “We are all Khaled said”. Big Data & Society, 2(2). http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2053951715614980.

  • Rogers, R. (2009). The end of the virtual: Digital methods. https://doi.org/10.5517/7989056295936.

  • Rogers, R. (2013). Digital methods. Cambridge, UK: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sajuria, J., & Fabrega, J. (2016). Do we need polls? Why Twitter will not replace opinion surveys but can complement them. In H. Snee, C. Hine, Y. Morey, S. Roberts, & H. Watson (Eds.), Digital methods for social sciences (pp. 87–104). Houndsmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S., Puppis, M., & Van den Bulck, H. (2016). European media policy for the twenty-first century (edited collection). London, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Snee, H., Hine, C., Morey, Y., Roberts, S., & Watson, H. (2016). Digital methods as mainstream methodology: An introduction. In H. Snee, C. Hine, Y. Morey, S. Roberts, & H. Watson (Eds.), Digital methods for social sciences (pp. 1–11). Houndsmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soo Chon, B., Choi, J. H., Barnett, G. A., Danowski, J. A., & Joo, S.-H. (2003). A structural analysis of media convergence: Cross-industry mergers and acquisitions in the information industries. Journal of Media Economics, 16(3), 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Cuilenburg, J., & McQuail, D. (2003). Media policy paradigm shifts: Towards a new communications policy paradigm. European Journal of Communication, 18(2), 181–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bulck, H., & Donders, K. (2014). Of discourses, stakeholders and advocacy coalitions in media policy: Tracing negotiations towards the new management contract of Flemish public broadcaster VRT. European Journal of Communication, 29(1), 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanhaeght, A.-S., & Donders, K. (2015). Moving beyond the borders of top-down broadcasting: An analysis of younger users’ participation in public service media. Television and New Media, 17(4), 291–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vis, F. (2013). A critical reflection on big data: Considering APIs, researchers and tools as data makers. First Monday, 18(10). http://ojs-prod-lib.cc.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4878.

  • Vlassis, A. (2016). European Commission, trade agreements and diversity of cultural expressions: Between autonomy and influence. European Journal of Communication, 31(4), 446–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallin, I., Carlsson, J., & Hansen, H. P. (2016). Envisioning future forested landscapes in Sweden—Revealing local-national discrepancies through participatory action research. Forest Policy and Economics, 73, 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, M. (2009). Participatory action research. In A. Bryman (Ed.), Social research methods (pp. 151–158). London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, L. (2008). The consumer and advertising regulation in the television without frontiers and audiovisual media services directives. Journal of Consumer Policy, 31(1), 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Felt, M. (2016). Social media and the social sciences: How researchers employ big data analytics. Big Data & Society, 3(1). http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2053951716645828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hand, M., & Hillyard, S. (2014). Big data? Qualitative approaches to digital research. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, G. N., Tacchi, J. A., Foth, M., & Lennie, J. (2008). Action research and new media: Concepts, methods and cases. New York: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, H., Moss, G., Birchall, C., & Moshonas, S. (2015). Balancing the potential and problems of digital methods through action research: Methodological reflections. Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 172–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. (2013). Digital methods. Cambridge, UK: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. iMEC-SMIT, Department of Communication Studies, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

    Karen Donders & Leo Van Audenhove

  2. Department of Communication Studies, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

    Leo Van Audenhove

  3. CoLAB, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa

    Leo Van Audenhove

Authors
  1. Karen Donders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leo Van Audenhove
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication, Drexel University, Philadelphia, USA

    Hilde Van den Bulck

  2. Department of Communication and Media Research, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland

    Manuel Puppis

  3. Department of Communication Studies, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

    Karen Donders

  4. Department of Communication Studies, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

    Leo Van Audenhove

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Donders, K., Van Audenhove, L. (2019). Digitization and Media Policy Research. In: Van den Bulck, H., Puppis, M., Donders, K., Van Audenhove, L. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Methods for Media Policy Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16065-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation