Abstract
Regulation of protein phosphorylation plays an important role in many cellular processes, particularly in signal transduction. Diseases such as cancer and inflammation are often linked to aberrant signaling pathways. Mass spectrometry-based methods allow monitoring the phosphorylation status in an unbiased and quantitative manner. The analysis of this data requires the application of advanced statistical methods, some of which can be borrowed from the gene expression analysis field. Nevertheless, these methods have to be enhanced or complemented by new methods. After reviewing the key concepts of phosphoproteomics and some major data analysis methods, these tools are applied to a real-world data set.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hunter T (2000) Signaling–2000 and beyond. Cell 100:113–127
Pawson T, Nash P (2003) Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains. Science 300:445–452
Blume-Jensen P, Hunter T (2001) Oncogenic kinase signalling. Nature 411:355–365
Kaminska B (2005) MAPK signalling pathways as molecular targets for anti-inflammatory therapy – from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic benefits. Biochim Biophys Acta 1754:253–262
Tebbe A, Klammer M, Kaminski M, Wandinger S, Eckert C, Müller S, Gorray M, Enghofer E, Schaab C, Godl K (2009) Mode of action analysis of sorafenib by integrating chemical proteomics and phosphoproteomics. Eur J Cancer 7:14–15
Lim YP (2005) Mining the tumor phosphoproteome for cancer markers. Clin Cancer Res 11:3163–3169
Huang PH, Mukasa A, Bonavia R, Flynn RA, Brewer ZE, Cavenee WK et al (2007) Quantitative analysis of EGFRvIII cellular signaling networks reveals a combinatorial therapeutic strategy for glioblastoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:12867–12872
Olsen JV, Blagoev B, Gnad F, Macek B, Kumar C, Mortensen P, Mann M (2006) Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell 127:635–648
Macek B, Mann M, Olsen JV (2009) Global and site-specific quantitative phosphoproteomics: principles and applications. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 49:199–221
Rush J, Moritz A, Lee KA, Guo A, Goss VL, Spek EJ et al (2005) Immunoaffinity profiling of tyrosine phosphorylation in cancer cells. Nat Biotechnol 23:94–101
Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I, Kristensen DB, Steen H, Pandey A, Mann M (2002) Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 1:376–386
Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, Dudoit S et al (2004) Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol 5:R80
Mueller LN, Rinner O, Schmidt A, Letarte S, Bodenmiller B, Brusniak MY et al (2007) SuperHirn – a novel tool for high resolution LC-MS-based peptide/protein profiling. Proteomics 7:3470–3480
Cox J, Mann M (2008) MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol 26:1367–1372
Cox J, Matic I, Hilger M, Nagaraj N, Selbach M, Olsen JV, Mann M (2009) A practical guide to the MaxQuant computational platform for SILAC-based quantitative proteomics. Nat Protoc 4:698–705
Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G (2001) Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:5116–5121
Bonferroni CE (1936) Teoria statistica delle classi e calcolo delle prababilita. Publicazioni del R Istituto Superiore di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali di Firenzi 9:3–62
Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70
Hochberg Y (1988) A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 75:800–803
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 57:289–300
Storey JD, Tibshirani R (2003) Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:9440–9445
Xie Y, Pan W, Khodursky AB (2005) A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data. Bioinformatics 21:4280–4288
Jiao S, Zhang S (2008) On correcting the overestimation of the permutation-based false discovery rate estimator. Bioinformatics 24:1655–1661
Fisher RA (1935) The logic of inductive inference. J Royal Stat Soc 98:39–54
Zeeberg BR, Feng W, Wang G, Wang MD, Fojo AT, Sunshine M et al (2003) GoMiner: a resource for biological interpretation of genomic and proteomic data. Genome Biol 4:R28
Maere S, Heymans K, Kuiper M (2005) BiNGO: a Cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks. Bioinformatics 21:3448–3449
Ackermann M, Strimmer K (2009) A general modular framework for gene set enrichment analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 10:47
Goeman JJ, Buhlmann P (2007) Analyzing gene expression data in terms of gene sets: methodological issues. Bioinformatics 23:980–987
McDermott U, Sharma SV, Dowell L, Greninger P, Montagut C, Lamb J et al (2007) Identification of genotype-correlated sensitivity to selective kinase inhibitors by using high-throughput tumor cell line profiling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:19936–19941
Zhou Y, Cras-Meneur C, Ohsugi M, Stormo GD, Permutt MA (2007) A global approach to identify differentially expressed genes in cDNA (two-color) microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 23:2073–2079
Kanehisa M, Goto S (2000) KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 28:27–30
Hay N, Sonenberg N (2004) Upstream and downstream of mTOR. Genes Dev 18:1926–1945
Stemmann O, Zou H, Gerber SA, Gygi SP, Kirschner MW (2001) Dual inhibition of sister chromatid separation at metaphase. Cell 107:715–726
Mueller LN, Brusniak MY, Mani DR, Aebersold R (2008) An assessment of software solutions for the analysis of mass spectrometry based quantitative proteomics data. J Proteome Res 7:51–61
Kitteringham NR, Jenkins RE, Lane CS, Elliott VL, Park BK (2009) Multiple reaction monitoring for quantitative biomarker analysis in proteomics and metabolomics. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 877:1229–1239
Ritz A, Shakhnarovich G, Salomon AR, Raphael BJ (2009) Discovery of phosphorylation motif mixtures in phosphoproteomics data. Bioinformatics 25:14–21
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Schaab, C. (2011). Analysis of Phosphoproteomics Data. In: Hamacher, M., Eisenacher, M., Stephan, C. (eds) Data Mining in Proteomics. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 696. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-987-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-987-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-60761-986-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-60761-987-1
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols