Skip to main content

The Role of Professional Learning Communities in Successful Response to Intervention Implementation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Response to Intervention

Abstract

The authors take an in-depth look at the evolution of professional learning communities (PLCs), professional structures in which teachers, administrators, and educational specialists collaborate to understand a problem, propose, and enact new ideas, and analyze the effects of their teaching on student learning. They outline what the research literature says about PLCs’ effectiveness for improving teaching, student learning, and school productivity. They share characteristics of PLCs and how these correspond to goals and structures within a response to intervention (RTI) process. The authors also describe a data-based meeting that merges principles from the PLC and RTI literature, and present examples of schools that are integrating these two currents in school reform. Suggested resources are provided to guide PLC implementation along with recommendations for future research to enhance the role of PLCs in RTI implementation.

We therefore judge our success in transforming the teaching profession by our students’ outcomes: High levels of student achievement, judged by multiple measures that assess students’ ability to understand and apply the knowledge and skills that matter most to their readiness for college, careers, and citizenship. From Transforming the Teaching Profession Vision Statement (US Department of Education 2012)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 269.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 349.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Astuto, T. A., Clark, D. L., Read, A.-M., McGree, K., & Fernandez, L. deK. P. (1993). Challenges to dominant assumptions controlling educational reform. Andover. Regional Laboratory for the Educational Improvement of the Northeast and Islands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B., Johnson, D., & Montgomery, D. (2005). The power of teacher leadership. Educational Leadership, 62(5), 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnette, B. (2002). How we formed our community. Journal of Staff Development, 23(1), 51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, M. K., & Gibbons, K. A. (2008). Implementing response-to-intervention in elementary and secondary schools: Procedures to assure scientific-based practices. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clauset, K. H., Lick, D. W., & Murphy, C. U. (2008). Schoolwide action research for Professional Learning Communities. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordingley, P., Bell, M., Rundell, B., & Evans, D. (2003). The impact of collaborative CPD on classroom teaching and learning. Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 597–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1999). Investing in teaching as a learning profession: Policy problems and prospects. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 376–411). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuFour, R. (2004). What is a Professional Learning Community? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuFour, R., & Marzano, R. J. (2011). Leaders of learning: How district, school and classroom leaders improve student achievement. Bloomington: Solution Tree.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuFour, R., DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (2005). On common ground: The power of professional learning communities. Bloomington: Solution-Tree.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, F., Nave, B., & Lewis, A. (2000). Critical friends groups: Teachers helping to improve student learning. Phi Delta Kappa International Research Bulletin (CEDR), 28, 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hord, S. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. http://www.sedl.org/pubs/change34/. Accessed 3 Dec 2012.

  • Hord, S. M., & Hirsch, S. A. (2008). Making the promise a reality. In A. M. Blankstein, P. D. Houston, & R. W. Cole (Eds.), Soul of educational leadership: Sustaining professional learning communities (pp. 23–40). Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T. A., & Kritsonis, W. (2007). Professional learning communities and the positive effects on student achievement. A national agenda for school improvement. http://www.allthingsplc.info/pdf/articles/plcandthepositiveeffects.pdf. Accessed 8 Dec 2012.

  • International Reading Association. (2010). Response to intervention: Guiding principles for educators from the International Reading Association (Position statement). Newark: Author. http://www.reading.org/general/AboutIRA/PositionStatements/ResponsetoIntervention.aspx. Accessed 10 Dec 2012.

  • Kruse, S., Louis, K. S., & Bryk, A. (1994). Building professional community in schools. Issues in Restructuring Schools, (6), 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. E., Smith, J. B., & Croninger, R. G. (1995). Another look at high school restructuring. Issues in Restructuring Schools, Fall (9), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, A. (1995). Practices that support teacher development: Transforming conceptions of professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 591–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, A. (2003, August). Building learning communities in underperforming schools: The tension between improvement and survival: Seattle case study summary. www.teachercollaboration.net. Accessed 10 Dec 2012.

  • Lindsey, D. B., Jugwirth, L. D., Pahl, J. V. N. C., & Lindsey, R. B. (2009). Culturally proficient learning communities. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, J. W., Gearhart, M., Curry, M., & Kafka, J. (2003). Looking at student work for teacher learning, teacher community, and school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(3), 184–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 757–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K. S., & Marks, H. M. (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom teacher’s work and student experiences in restructuring schools? American Journal of Education, 106(4), 532–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & DiRanna, K. (2008). The data coach’s guide to improving learning for all students. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2010, Spring). Professional learning communities: Building blocks for school culture and student learning. Annenberg Institute for School Reform VUE. http://www.annenberginstitute.org/VUE/. Accessed 10 Dec 2012.

  • Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G. G. (1996). Conclusion: Restructuring for authentic student achievement. In F. M. Newmann (Ed.), Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality (pp. 286–301). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peery, A. (2011). The data teams experience: A guide for effective meetings. Englewood: Lead + Learn Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. (2003, Spring). Powerful learning: Creating learning communities in urban school reform. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18(3), 240–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • PRESS. (2011). Path to Reading Excellence in School Sites ( PRESS) Resources. http://www.cehd.umn.edu/reading/PRESS/resources/default.html. Accessed 6 Dec 2012.

  • Reichstetter, R. (2006). Defining a professional learning communitiy. E & R Research Alert, (No. 06.05).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, W. M., Goldenberg, C. N., & Gallimore, R. (2009). Increasing achievement by focusing grade level teams on improving classroom learning: A prospective, quasi-experimental study of Title 1 schools. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 1006–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahan, D. (2003). Promoting a collaborative professional culture in three elementary schools that have beaten the odds. The Elementary School Journal, 104(2), 127–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supovitz, J. A. (2002, December). Developing communities of instructional practice. Teachers College Record, 104(8), 1591–1626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supovitz, J. A., & Christman, J. B. (2003). Developing communities of instructional practice: Lessons for Cincinnati and Philadelphia. CPRE Policy Briefs, University of Pennsylvania, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2012). Transforming the teaching profession. www2.ed.gov/documents/labor-management-collaboration/vision-statement.pdf. Accessed 24 Oct 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Burns, M. K. (2010). Essentials of response to intervention. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E. R., Small, S., Chen, R., Pratt, A., & Denckla, M. B. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). Review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, S. H., & McIntosh, J. (2007). Data delivers a wake-up call. Journal of Staff Development, 28(2), 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, T. (2010). Fostering shared leadership. Leadership, 40(2), 22–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wixson, K. K., Lipson, M. Y., & Johnston, P. H. (2010). Making the most of RTI. In M.Y. Lipson & K. K. Wixson (Eds.), Successful approaches to RTI: Collaborative practices for improving K-12 literacy (pp. 1–19). Newark: International Reading Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lori Helman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Helman, L., Rosheim, K. (2016). The Role of Professional Learning Communities in Successful Response to Intervention Implementation. In: Jimerson, S., Burns, M., VanDerHeyden, A. (eds) Handbook of Response to Intervention. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7568-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics