Skip to main content

Coping with labour pain: the midwife’s role

  • Chapter
Midwives, Research and Childbirth

Abstract

The research study described in this chapter forms part of a larger study on ‘Factors affecting labour pain’ (Niven and Gijsbers, 1984; Niven, 1985; 1986) and was particularly concerned with the role played by psychological factors in modulating labour pain. The study was informed by current theories of pain perception, such as the gate theory (Melzack and Wall, 1965; 1988), which predict that psychological factors as well as physiological ones can affect pain perception. Accordingly the study examined the effects of obstetric factors such as parity, induction of labour, duration of labour and weight of the baby as well as the effects of psychological factors such as the desirability of pregnancy, expectations of childbirth, antenatal education, and the presence of the partner during labour. Other factors examined included analgesic use (pethidine and Entonox), social class and previous pain experience. These factors were examined in the first phase of the study which involved 101 labouring women. In the second phase of the study the coping strategies of 51 of these women were examined in some detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barber, T. and Cooper, B. (1972) Effects on pain of experimentally induced and spontaneous distraction. Psychological Reports, 31, 647–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M.R. and Pearson, B. (1969) Psychological aspects of pain in women with advanced cancer of the cervix. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 13, 13–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonica, J.J. (1967) Principals and practice of obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia. Davis, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonica, J.J. (1975) The nature of pain of parturition. In J.J. Bonica (ed.) Obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia; recent advances and current status. WB Saunders, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, K. (1968) Pain, anxiety and perceived control. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 32, 596–602.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brewin, C. and Bradley, C. (1982) Perceived control and the experience of childbirth. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 263–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M.B. and Forsythe, A.B. (1974a) The small sample behaviour of some statistics which test the equality of several means. Technometrics, 16, 129–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M.B. and Forsythe, A.B. (1974b) Robust tests for the equality of variances. Journal of the American Statistics Association, 69, 364–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D.J., Freudlich, A. and Meyter, R.C. (1975) Differential effectiveness of electromyographic feedback, verbal relaxation instructions and medication placebo with tension headaches. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 892–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dallenbach, A. (1939) Somesthesis. In J. Boring (ed.) Introduction to psychology. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeKornfeld, T.J., Pearson, J.W. and Lasagna, L. (1964) Methotrimeprazine in the treatment of labour pain. New England Journal of Medicine, 270, 391–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, W. and Massey, F. Jr (1969) Analysis of co-variance. In W. Dixon and F. Massey Jr (eds) Introduction to statistical analysis, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S. (1984) Personal control and stress and coping processes; a theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 839–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horan, J.J., Layng, F.C. and Purcell, C.H. (1976) Preliminary study of effects of `in-vivo’ emotive imagery in dental discomfort. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42, 105–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J., Phillips M. and Rachman S. (1979) Memory for pain. Pain, 6, 35–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsson, E. (1929) Progressive relaxation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, S. (1962) The experiences of childbirth. Gollancz, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, F., Cogan, R. and Henneborn, W. (1975) Second stage medical intervention and pain during childbirth. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 19, 289–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCaul, K. and Haugtvedt, C. (1982) Attention, distraction and cold pressor pain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 154–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Markova, I., Lockyer, R. and Forbes, C. (1980) Self perception of employed and unemployed haemophiliacs. Psychological Medicine, 10, 559–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Melzack, R. (1975) The McGill Pain Questionnaire; major properties and scoring methods. Pain, 1, 277–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Melzack, R. and Torgerson, W. (1971) On the language of pain. Anaesthesiology, 34, 50–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Melzack, R. and Wall, P.D. (1965) Pain mechanisms; a new theory. Science, 150, 971–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Melzack, R. and Wall, P.D. (1988) The challenge of pain, 2nd edn. Penguin, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melzack, R., Kinch, R., Dobkin, P., Lebrun, M. and Taenzer, P. (1984) Severity of labour pain; influence of physical as well as psychologic variables. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 20, 215–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, B., Bulphit, C.J., Clifton, P. and Lewis, P.I. (1982) Effectiveness of pain relief in labour; survey or 1000 mothers. British Medical Journal, 285, 689–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nettlebladt, P., Fagerstrom, C.F. and Uddenberg, G. (1976) The significance of reported childbirth pain. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 20, 215–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R.E. and Schacter, S. (1966) Cognitive manipulations of pain. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 2, 227–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niven, C. (1985) How helpful is the presence of the husband at childbirth? Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 3, 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niven, C. (1986) Factors affecting labour pain. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Stirling.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niven, C. and Gijsbers, K. (1984) Obstetric and non-obstetric factors related to labour pain. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 2, 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. (1979) Becoming a mother. Robertson, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reading, A. (1983) The McGill Pain Questionnaire; an appraisal. In R. Melzack (ed.) Pain measurement and assessment. Raven Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reading, A.E. and Cox, D.N. (1985) Psychological predictors of labour pain. Pain, 22, 309–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Revill S., Robinson, J., Rosen, M. and Hogg, M. (1976) The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia, 31, 1191–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, N. (1966) Generalised expectancies for internal vs. external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rybstein-Blinchik, E. (1976) Effects of different cognitive strategies on chronic pain experience. Journal of Behavioural Medicine, 2, 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seers, K. (1989) Patients’ perceptions of acute pain. In J. Wilson-Barnett and S. Robinson (eds) Directions in nursing research. Scutari Press, London. Scott, J. and Huskisson, E.C. (1976) Graphic representation of pain. Pain, 2, 175–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Palmer, J. and Skevington, S. (1981) Pain during childbirth and menstruation; a study of locus of control. Journal of. Psychosomatic Research, 3, 151–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, R.J. and Heide, F. (1977) Analgesic characteristics of prepared childbirth techniques; attention focusing and systematic relaxation. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 21, 429–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sternbach, R.A. (1968) Pain: a psychological analysis. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C.I., Demchik-Stone, D.A. and Horan, J.J. (1977) Coping with pain; a component analysis of Lamaze and cognitive-behavioural procedures. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 21, 451–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolkind, S. and Zajicek, E. (1981) Pregnancy; a psychological and social study. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, E.L. Jr (1982) Labour room and laboratory; clinical validation of the cold pressor as a means of testing preparation for childbirth strategies. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 26, 223–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Niven, C. (1993). Coping with labour pain: the midwife’s role. In: Robinson, S., Thomson, A.M. (eds) Midwives, Research and Childbirth. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6958-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6958-3_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-412-34800-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-6958-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics