Skip to main content

Abstract

In this chapter we present a discussion of engineering design and the differences between the design as an artifact and the design as an activity. Hence, different taxonomies of design, as well as different models of the design process, are discussed. Furthermore, their relationships to intelligent computer-aided design are also discussed. The purpose of this chapter is to present different facets of design characterization as discussed in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brown, D. C., and Chandrasekaran B. (1985). Expert systems for a class of mechanical design activity. In J. S. Gero (editor) Knowledge Engineering in Computer Aided Design. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. C., and Chandrasekaran, B. (1989). Design Problem Solving: Knowledge Structures and Control Strategies. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucciarelli, L. L., and Schon, D. S. (1987). Generic design process in architecture and engineering: A dialog concerning at least two design worlds. In M. Waldron (Ed.). Proceedings from the NSF Workshop on the Design Process, Oakland, CA. 43–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cagan, J., and Agogino, A. M. (1987). Innovative design of mechanical structures from first principles. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 1 (3), 169–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J. R. (1987). On research methodology towards a scientific theory of engineering design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 1 (3), 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J. R., Guenette, M. J., Irani, R. K., Nielsen, E. H., Orelup, M. F., and Welch, R. V. (1989). Computer-based models of design processes: The evaluation of designs for redesign. In Preprints of the National Science Foundation (NSF) Engineering Design Research Conference, University of Amherst. MA. 491–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dym, C. L. (1994). Engineering Design: A Synthesis of Views. Cambridge University Press, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dym, C. L., and Levitt, R. E. (1991). Knowledge Based Systems in Engineering. McGraw Hill, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finger, S., and Dixon, J. R. (1989). A review of research in mechanical engineering design. Part I: descriptive, prescriptive and computer based models of design process. Research in Engineering Design 1 (1), 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzhorn, P. (1989). In Preprints of the National Science Foundation (NSF) Engi-neering Design Research Conference University of Amherst. MA. 221–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, M. E. (1992). Form, Structure and Mechanisms. London, UK: MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mastow, J. (1985). Towards better models of the design process. AI Magazine Spring, pp. 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, S. M., Dym, C. L., and Morjaria, M. (1986). PRIDE: An expert system for the design of paper handling system IEEE Computer, 19 (7), 102–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, G. and Beitz, W. (1984). Engineering Design. London, UK: The Design Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, M. and Brown, D. (1992). Evaluating design knowledge compilation mech-anisms. In D. Brown et al. (Eds.). Intelligent Computer Aided Design. Amsterdam: North Holland. 351–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh, N. (1990). The Principles of Design. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, D. G., Dietterich, T. G., and Stauffer, L. A. (1988). A model of the mechanical design process based on empirical data: A summary. In J. S. Gero, (Ed.). AI in Engineering Design. New York: Elsevier, 193–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, D. G., Wood, S., and Craig, D. (1990). The importance of drawing in the mechanical design process. Computers and Graphics, 14 (2), 263–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, D. G. (1992a). A taxonomy for mechanical design. Research in Engineering Design, 4 (3), 172–187.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, D. G. (1992b). The Mechanical Design Process. New York: McGraw Hill. Ulrich, K., and Seering, W. (1989). Conceptual design: synthesis of schematic descrip-tions in mechanical design. Research in Engineering Design, 1 (1), 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, K. N., and Hales C. (1987). The application and evaluation of formal design engineering methods. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, Boston, MA: 94–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, M. B. (1988). Tristratal level of design: A foundation for intelligent CAD in mechanical engineering. Proceedings IFIPWG 5.2 Workshop on Intelligent CAD Preprints, 468–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, M. B. (1989). Modeling of the design process. In H. Yoshikawa and D. Gossard (Eds.). Intelligent CAD I. Amsterdam: North Holland, 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, M. B. (1990). Understanding design. In H. Yoshikawa and T. Holden (Eds.). Intelligent CAD II. New York: North Holland, 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, M. (1991). Design processes and intelligent CAD. In F. Arbab and H. Yoshikawa (Eds.). Intelligent CAD III. Amsterdam: North Holland, 56–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, M. B., and Waldron, K. J. (1988). Position paper on conceptual CAD for mechanical designers. Proceedings of Computers in Engineering, August, 2. 203211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, M. B., and Waldron, K. J. (1988). Time study of the design of complex mechanical systems. Design Studies April 9 (2), 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, M. B., and Waldron, K. J. (1989). Empirical study on generation of constraints which direct design decisions in conceptual mechanical design. 1989 NSF Engineering Design Conference U Mass. June 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, M. B., Waldron, K. J., and D. H. Owen (1989). Use of systemic theory to represent the conceptual mechanical design process. In Newsome et al. (Eds.). Design Theory 88. New York: Springer Verlag, 36–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, M. B. and Vohnout, V. J. (1989). Formalizing knowledge in design for CAD/CAM integration. In A. Samuel (Ed.). Managing Design and Manufacturing. Amsterdam: North Holland. 42–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. C. (1992). Interaction-based design: constructing novel devices from first principles. In D. Brown et al. (Eds.). Intelligent Computer Aided Design. Amsterdam: North Holland. 255–275.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Waldron, M.B., Waldron, K.J. (1996). Design Characterizations. In: Waldron, M.B., Waldron, K.J. (eds) Mechanical Design: Theory and Methodology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2561-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2561-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-2563-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2561-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics