Skip to main content

Methods of Studying Mechanical Design

  • Chapter
Mechanical Design: Theory and Methodology

Abstract

In this chapter we present different methods used for studying mechanical design, including the process of creating designed artifacts. If we wish to understand fully the manner in which successful products are created and design specifications are converted into information for manufacturing and use, then we need to comprehend better the design process that creates them. While successful engineering products have been designed for centuries, understanding the process of this conversion has only begun. This has been largely motivated by a need to create a more efficient process to decrease time to market, requiring better design tools to assist designers in coping with the increasing informational demands placed upon them. The methods of study naturally involve interactions with designers or design teams, be it through case studies, interviews, or observations. In this chapter we survey different methods currently in use to study this process and provide the context in which each method can be used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Boose, J. H. (1989). A survey of knowledge acquisition techniques and tools. Knowledge Acquisition, 1, 3–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiaans, H., and Dorst, K. (1992). Cognitive models in industrial design engineering: A protocol study. ASME Proceedings Design Theory and Methodology DE 42, pp. 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dervin, B. (1989). Users as research inventions: How research categories perpetuate myths. Journal of Communication, 39 (3), 216–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dervin, B. (1992). From the mind’s eye of the user: The sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology. In Glazier, J. D. and Powell, R. R. Qualitative Research in Information Management. Englewood, CO: Libraries, Unlimited, Inc. pp. 6184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J. R. (1988). On research methodology towards a scientific theory of engineering design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 1 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., and Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., and Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of the Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hales, C. (1987). Analysis of the Engineering Design Process in an Industrial Context. Hampshire, England: Gants Hill Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, A. (1986). Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, J. R. (1990). Questions: Assessing the structure of knowledge and the use of information in design problem-solving. Ph.D. Dissertation. Ohio State University. UMI Dissertation Information Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, R., Ullman, D., Dietterich, T. (1992). A data representation for collaborative mechanical design. Research in Engineering Design 3, 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J. P. (1979). The Ethnographic Interview, New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriram, D., and Adey, R. (1987). Knowledge based expert systems in engineering: Planning and design. Surrey, UK: Computational Mechanics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, C., and Sriram, D., eds. (1992). Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Design, Vol. III. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, D. G., Stauffer, L. A., and Dietterich, T. G. (1988). A model of the mechanical design process based on empirical data. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 2, pp. 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, D. G., Stauffer, L. A., and Dietterich, T. G. (1987). Toward expert CAD. Computers in Mechanical Engineering, 56–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, D. G., Wood, S., and Craig, D. The importance of drawing in the mechanical design process. Proceedings 1989 NSF Engineering Design Research Conference, 31–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vest, C. (1994). Our revolution. ASEE Prism, 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, M. B. (1989). Observations on management of initial design specifications in mechanical design. In ICED 89 Proceedings, August, pp. 157–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, M. B. (1990). Understanding design. In H. Yoshikawa and T. Holden (Eds.). Intelligent CAD II. North Holland, pp. 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, M. B., and Brooks, R. L. (1994). Analyzing inter and intra group information exchanges in conceptual collaborative design. In Proceedings of ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, DE-68, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, pp. 241–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, M. B., and Herren, L. T. (1992). Using depositions to acquire conceptual design strategies. Working paper, The Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, M. B., and Waldron, K. J. (1988). A time sequence study of a complex mechanical systems design. Design Studies, 9, 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, M. B., and Waldron, K. J. (1992). Knowledge acquisition methodology in selection of components in mechanical design. In Tong, C., and Sriram, D., (Eds). Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Design, Vol. III. New York: Academic Press, pp. 57–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, M. B., Waldron, K. J., and Herren, L. T. (1989). Empirical study on generation of constraints which direct design decisions in conceptual mechanical design. In Proceedings 1989 NSF Engineering Design Conference, 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, V. R. (1985). Process tracing as a method for initial knowledge acquisition. Proceedings of 2nd IEEE Al Applications Conference, Miami, pp. 661–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, V. R. (1986). Interviewing for knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. PC-29 (2), 31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, D. A., and Newell, A. (1971). Protocol analysis as a task for artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 2, 285–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. P. (1985). Basic Content Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1989). Case Study Research Design and Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Waldron, M.B., Waldron, K.J. (1996). Methods of Studying Mechanical Design. In: Waldron, M.B., Waldron, K.J. (eds) Mechanical Design: Theory and Methodology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2561-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2561-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-2563-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2561-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics