Skip to main content

Ultrasound Velocity — A Measure of Stone Strength?

  • Chapter
  • 18 Accesses

Abstract

Urinary stones exhibit a variable response to extracorporeal Shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and endoscopic lithotripsy. Although fragmentation is affected by the patient’s size, the type of Shockwave generating system, mode of localisation etc, it is also known that the physico-chemical characteristics of calculi affect treatment outcome. However it is still unclear why some stones break more readily than others. Although chemical composition has been proposed as an important factor, a literature review revealed conflicting results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S Murata, H Watanabe, T Takahashi, K Watanabe and S Oinuma, Construction and strength of Urinary Calculi, Jpn J Urol 68: 249 (1977).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. SP Dretler, Stone fragility — a new therapeutic distinction, J Urol 139: 1124 (1988).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. LW Klee, CG Britto and JE Lingeman. The implications of brushite calculi, J Urol 145: 715 (1991).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. A Kelly, in: “Strong Solids,” Clarendon Press, Oxford (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  5. LG Johrde and FH Cocks, Microhardness studies of renal calculi, Mater lett 3: 111 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. HD Mitcheson, RG Zamenhoff, MS Bankoff and EL Prien, Determination of the chemical composition of urinary calculi by computerised tomography, J Urol 130: 814 (1983).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. WG Bowsher, P Crocker, JWA Ramsay and HN Whitfield, Single urine sample diagnosis. A new concept in stone diagnosis, Br J Urol 65: 236 (1990).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. NP Cohen, H Pakhouse, ML Scott, WG Bowsher, P Crocker and HN Whitfield. Prediction of response to lithotripsy — the use of scanning electron microscopy and X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy, Br J Urol 70: 469 (1992).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. CM Langton, AV Ali, CM Riggs, GP Evans and W Bonfield, A contact method for the assessment of ultrasonic velocity and broadband attenuation in cortical and cancellous bone, Clin Phys Physiol Meas 11: 243 (1990).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cohen, N.P., Whitfield, H.N., Shelton, J.C., Evans, G.P. (1994). Ultrasound Velocity — A Measure of Stone Strength?. In: Ryall, R., Bais, R., Marshall, V.R., Rofe, A.M., Smith, L.H., Walker, V.R. (eds) Urolithiasis 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2556-1_193

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2556-1_193

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6091-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-2556-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics