Skip to main content

Analysis of Similarity and Preference Data

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Statistical Analysis of Management Data
  • 3882 Accesses

Abstract

Similarity data in management research are typically collected in order to understand the underlying dimensions determining perceptions of stimuli such as brands or companies. One advantage of such data is that it is cognitively easier for respondents to provide subjective assessments of the similarity between objects than to rate these objects on a number of attributes that they may not even be aware of. Furthermore, when asking respondents to rate objects on attributes, the selection of the attributes proposed may influence the results while, in fact, it is not clear that these attributes are the relevant ones. In multidimensional scaling, the methodology allows you to infer the structure of perceptions. In particular, the researcher is able to make inferences regarding the number of dimensions that are necessary to fit the similarity data. In this chapter, we first describe the type of data collected to perform multidimensional scaling and we then present metric and nonmetric methods of multidimensional scaling. Multidimensional scaling explains the similarity of objects such as brands. We then turn to the analysis of preference data, where the objective is to model and explain preferences for objects. These explanations are based on the underlying dimensions of preferences that are discovered through the methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

Basic Technical Readings

  • Carroll, J. D., & Arabie, P. (1980). Multidimensional scaling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 607–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1980). Multidimensional scaling, tree-fitting, and clustering. Science, 210(24), 390–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Application Readings

  • Bijmolt, T. H. A., & Wedel, M. (1999). A comparison of multidimensional scaling methods for perceptual mapping. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 277–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L. G. (1983). A review of multidimensional scaling in marketing research. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7(4), 427–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSarbo, W. S., Young, M. R., & Rangaswamy, A. (1997). A parametric multidimensional unfolding procedure for incomplete nonmetric preference/choice set data in marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(4), 499–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSarbo, W. S., & De Soete, G. (1984). On the use of hierarchical clustering for the analysis of nonsymmetric proximities. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 601–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. E. (1975). Marketing applications of MDS: Assessment and outlook. Journal of Marketing, 39, 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. E., & Carmone, F. J. (1989). Multidimensional scaling: An introduction and comparison of nonmetric unfolding techniques. Journal of Marketing Research, 6, 330–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helsen, K., & Green, P. E. (1991). A computational study of replicated clustering with an application to market segmentation. Decision Sciences, 22, 1124–1141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. M. (1971). Market segmentation: A strategic management tool. Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N. K., Jain, A. K., Patil, A., Pinson, C., & Lan, W. (2010). Consumer cognitive complexity and the dimensionality of multidimensional scaling configurations. Review of Marketing Research, 7, 199–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neidell, L. A. (1969). The use of nonmetric multidimensional scaling in marketing analysis. Journal of Marketing, 33, 37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, D. E., Jr. (1974). A cluster analytic approach to market response functions. Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 109–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivatsava, R. K., Leone, R. P., & Shocker, A. D. (1981). Market structure analysis: Hierarchical clustering of products based on substitution in use. Journal of Marketing, 45(Summer), 38–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T. E., & Podolny, J. M. (1996). Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gatignon, H. (2014). Analysis of Similarity and Preference Data. In: Statistical Analysis of Management Data. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8594-0_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics