Abstract
Enteral nutrition (EN) can be administered using various methods such as continuous, cyclic, intermittent, and bolus techniques, either alone or in combination. In continuous feeding, an hourly rate of EN is administered using a feeding pump over 24 h. In cyclic feeding, EN is administered via a feeding pump in less than a 24-h time period. In intermittent feeding, EN is administered over 20-60 min every 4-6 h with or without a feeding pump. In bolus feeding, EN is administered via a syringe or gravity drip over a 4-10-min period. A number of factors are taken into consideration when selecting EN delivery modalities, such as the medical condition of the patient, expected tolerance to tube feeding, location of the feeding tube tip, type of formula used, nutritional requirements, mobility of the patient, availability of electric feeding pump, and cost. However, too little data are available at present to make a strong recommendation for one particular method of enteral feeding over others. In practice, it is generally considered acceptable for pump-assisted continuous feeding in critically ill patients to be initiated at a rate of 10-20 ml/h and then gradually increased to the target rate. For medically stable patients, intermittent and bolus feeding methods are preferred due to practical issues, such as patient mobility, convenience, and cost. At present, no evidence is available regarding the optimum feeding modality for not only an ordinary clinical setting but also critical care setting.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- EN:
-
Enteral nutrition
- GI:
-
Gastrointestinal
- ICU:
-
Intensive care unit
- NG:
-
Nasogastric
- RCT:
-
Randomized controlled trials
- VAP:
-
Ventilator-associated pneumonia
References
Barr J, Hecht M, Flavin KE, Khorana A, Gould MK. Outcomes in critically ill patients before and after the implementation of an evidence-based nutritional management protocol. Chest. 2004;125:1446–57.
Beau P, Labat J. Continuous vs discontinuous enteral nutrition: compared effects on serum lipids and lipoproteins in humans. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr. 1994;18:331–4.
Bonten MJ, Gaillard CA, van der Hulst R, et al. Intermittent enteral feeding: the influence on respiratory and digestive tract colonization in mechanically ventilated intensive-care-unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;154:394–9.
Brantley SL, Mills ME. Overview of enteral nutrition. In: Mueller CM, editor. The A.S.P.E.N. Nutrition support core curriculum. 2nd ed. Silver Spring: American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition; 2012. p. 170–84.
Campbell IT, Morton RP, Cole JA, Raine CH, Shapiro LM, Stell PM. A comparison of the effects of intermittent and continuous nasogastric feeding on the oxygen consumption and nitrogen balance of patients after major head and neck surgery. Am J Clin Nutr. 1983;38:870–8.
Campbell IT, Morton RP, Macdonald IA, Judd S, Shapiro L, Stell PM. Comparison of the metabolic effects of continuous postoperative enteral feeding and feeding at night only. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990;52:1107–12.
Ciocon JO, Galindo-Ciocon DJ, Tiessen C, Galindo D. Continuous compared with intermittent tube feeding in the elderly. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr. 1992;16:525–8.
Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Drover JW, et al. Feeding protocols. In: Canadian critical care nutrition guidelines. 2013a. http://www.criticalcarenutrition.com/docs/cpgs2012/5.1.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2014.
Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Drover JW, et al. Continuous vs. other methods of administration. In: Canadian critical care nutrition guidelines. 2013b. http://www.criticalcarenutrition.com/docs/cpgs2012/6.3.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2014.
Hiebert JM, Brown A, Anderson RG, Halfacre S, Rodeheaver GT, Edlich RF. Comparison of continuous vs intermittent tube feedings in adult burn patients. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr. 1981;5:73–5.
Kocan MJ, Hickisch SM. A comparison of continuous and intermittent enteral nutrition in NICU patients. J Neurosci Nurs. 1986;18:333–7.
Lee JS, Auyeung TW. A comparison of two feeding methods in the alleviation of diarrhoea in older tube-fed patients: a randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing. 2003;32:388–93.
Lee JS, Kwok T, Chui PY, et al. Can continuous pump feeding reduce the incidence of pneumonia in nasogastric tube-fed patients? a randomized controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2010;29:453–8.
Mackenzie SL, Zygun DA, Whitmore BL, Doig CJ, Hameed SM. Implementation of a nutrition support protocol increases the proportion of mechanically ventilated patients reaching enteral nutrition targets in the adult intensive care unit. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2005;29:74–80.
MacLeod JB, Lefton J, Houghton D, et al. Prospective randomized control trial of intermittent versus continuous gastric feeds for critically ill trauma patients. J Trauma. 2007;63:57–61.
Martin CM, Doig GS, Heyland DK, et al. Multicentre, cluster-randomized clinical trial of algorithms for critical-care enteral and parenteral therapy (ACCEPT). CMAJ. 2004;20:197–204.
McClave SA, Martindale RG, Vanek VW, et al. Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2009;33:277–316.
Mentec H, Dupont H, Bocchetti M, Cani P, Ponche F, Bleichner G. Upper digestive intolerance during enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: frequency, risk factors, and complications. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:1955–61.
National Collaborating Centre for Acute Care. Enteral tube feeding in hospital and the community. In: Mike Stroud. Nutrition support for adults: oral nutrition support, enteral tube feeding and parenteral nutrition. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2006.
Parrish CR. Enteral feeding: the art and the science. Nutr Clin Pract. 2003;18:76–85.
Pichard C, Roulet M. Constant rate enteral nutrition in bucco-pharyngeal cancer care. A highly efficient nutritional support system. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1984;9:209–14.
Serpa LF, Kimura M, Faintuch J, Ceconello I. Effects of continuous versus bolus infusion of enteral nutrition in critical patients. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2003;58:9–14.
Steevens EC, Lipscomb AF, Poole GV, Sacks GS. Comparison of continuous vs intermittent nasogastric enteral feeding in trauma patients: perceptions and practice. Nutr Clin Pract. 2002;17:118–22.
Tamowicz B, Mikstacki A, Grzymislawski M. The influence of the feeding therapy model on pulmonary complications in patients treated under conditions of intensive therapy. Adv Clin Exp. 2007;16:365–73.
Ukleja A. Altered GI, motility in critically Ill patients: current understanding of pathophysiology, clinical impact, and diagnostic approach. Nutr Clin Pract. 2010;25:16–25.
van Berge Henegouwen MI, Akkermans LM, et al. Prospective, randomized trial on the effect of cyclic versus continuous enteral nutrition on postoperative gastric function after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 1997;226:677–85.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ichimaru, S., Amagai, T. (2015). Intermittent and Bolus Methods of Feeding in Critical Care. In: Rajendram, R., Preedy, V.R., Patel, V.B. (eds) Diet and Nutrition in Critical Care. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7836-2_139
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7836-2_139
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7837-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7836-2
eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine