Skip to main content

A Model of Partnership Formation with Friction and Multiple Criteria

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Search Theory
  • 1451 Accesses

Abstract

We present a game theoretical sequential search problem modelling partnership formation based on two discrete character traits. There are two classes of individual. Each individual observes a sequence of potential partners from the other class. The traits are referred to as attractiveness and character, respectively. All individuals prefer partners of high attractiveness and similar character. Attractiveness can be measured instantly. However, in order to observe the character of an individual, a costly interview (or date) is required. On observing the attractiveness of a prospective partner, an individual must decide whether he/she wishes to proceed to the interview stage. During the interview phase, the prospective pair observe each other’s character and then decide whether they wish to form a pair. Mutual acceptance is required for both an interview to occur and a pair to form. An individual stops searching on finding a partner. A set of criteria based on the concept of a trembling hand perfect equilibrium is used to define an equilibrium of this game. It is argued that under such a general formulation there may be multiple equilibria. For this reason, we define a specific formulation of the game, the so called symmetric version, which has a unique symmetric equilibrium. The form of this equilibrium has some similarities to the block separating equilibrium derived for classical models of two-sided mate choice and job search problems, but is essentially different.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Albelda R. P.: Occupational segregation by race and gender: 1958–1981. Industrial and Labour Relations Review. 39: 404–411 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Albrecht J., Gautier P. A. and Vroman S.: Equilibrium directed search with multiple applications. Rev. Econ. Studies. 73: 869–891 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Alpern S. and Reyniers D.: Strategic mating with homotypic preferences. J. Theor. Biol. 198, 71–88 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alpern S. and Reyniers D.: Strategic mating with common preferences. J. Theor. Biol. 237, 337–354 (2005).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Andolfatto D.: Business cycles and labor-market search. Am. Econ. Rev. 86: 112–132 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beller A. H.: Occupational segregation by sex: Determinants and changes. J. Hum. Res. 17: 371–392 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Burdett K.: A theory of employee job search and quit rates. Am. Econ. Rev. 84: 1261–1277 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burdett K. and Coles M. G.: Long-term partnership formation: marriage and employment. The Economic Journal, 109, 307–334 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chade H. and Smith L.: Simultaneous search. Econometrica. 74: 1293–1307 (2006).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Coles M. G. and Burdett K. Marriage and class. Quart. J. Econ. 112: 141–168 (1997).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Coles M. G. and Francesconi M.: On the emergence of toyboys: Equilibrium matching with ageing and uncertain careers. IZA Discussion Papers 2612, Institute for the study of labor (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Devine T. J. and Piore M. J.: Empirical Labor Economics: The Search Approach. Open University Press, New York (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Diamond P. and Maskin E.: An equilibrium analysis of search and breach of contract 1: Steady states. Bell J. Econ. 10: 282–316 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Drewlanka S.: A generalized model of commitment. Math. Soc. Sci. 52: 233–251 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fawcett T. W. and Bleay C.: Previous experiences shape adaptive mate preferences. Behav. Ecol. 20, 68–78 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fisman R., Iyengar S. S., Kamenica E. and Simonson I.: Gender differences in mate selection: Evidence from a speed dating experiment. Quart. J. Econ. 121: 673–679 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fisman R., Iyengar S. S., Kamenica E. and Simonson I.: Racial preferences in dating. Rev. Econ. Stud. 75: 117–132 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gale D. and Shapley L. S.: College admissions and the stability of marriage. Am. Math. Monthly, 69, 9–15 (1962).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Galenianos M. and Kircher P.: Directed search with multiple job applications. J. Econ. Theory. 144: 445–471 (2009).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Härdling R. and Kokko H.: The evolution of prudent choice. Evol. Ecol. Res. 7, 697–715 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hey J. D.: Search for rules of search. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 3: 65–81 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Janetos A. C.: Strategies of female mate choice: a theoretical analysis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 7, 107–112 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Johnstone R. A.: The tactics of mutual mate choice and competitive search. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 40, 51–59 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jovanovic B.: Job matching and the theory of turnover. J. Pol. Econ. 87: 972–990 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. MacMinn R. D.: Search and market equilibrium. J. Pol. Econ. 88: 308–327 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Marimon R. and Zilibotti F.: Unemployment vs. mismatch of talents: Reconsidering unemployment benefits. Econ. J. 109: 255–291 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  27. McCall J. J.: Information and job search. Quart. J. Econ. 84: 113–126 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. McNamara J. M. and Collins E. J.: The job search problem as an employer-candidate game. J. Appl. Prob. 28, 815–827 (1990).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Nisam N., Roughgarden T., Tardos E. and Vazirani V. V.: Algorithmic Game Theory. Cambridge University Press, New York (2007).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Peterson T., Saporta I. and Seidel M. -D. L.: Offering a job: Meritocracy and social networks. Am. J. Sociol. 106: 763–816 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pissarides C.: Search unemployment with on-the-job search. Rev. Econ. Stud. 61: 457–475 (1994).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Ramsey D. M.: A large population job search game with discrete time. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 188, 586–602 (2008).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Shimer R.: The assignment of workers to jobs in an economy with coordination frictions. J. Pol. Econ. 113: 996–1025 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shimer R. and Smith L.: Assortative matching and search. Econometrica. 68: 343–369 (2000).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Smith L.: The marriage model with search frictions. J. Pol. Econ. 114: 1124–1144 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Spear S. E.: Learning rational expectations under computability constraints. Econometrica. 57: 889–910 (1989).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Spear S. E.: Growth, externalities and sunspots. J. Econ. Theory. 54: 215–223 (1991).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Velupillai K. V.: Expository notes of computability and complexity in (arithmetical) games. J. Econ. Dynam. Cont. 21: 955–979 (1997).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Whittle P.: Optimization Over Time, Vol. 1. Wiley, New York (1982).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Kinsella .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kinsella, S., Ramsey, D.M. (2013). A Model of Partnership Formation with Friction and Multiple Criteria. In: Alpern, S., Fokkink, R., GÄ…sieniec, L., Lindelauf, R., Subrahmanian, V. (eds) Search Theory. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6825-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6825-7_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6824-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6825-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics