Skip to main content

Adaptive Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Encyclopedia of Systems and Control
  • 894 Accesses

Abstract

Adaptive control of linear time-invariant (LTI) systems deals with the control of LTI systems whose parameters are constant but otherwise completely unknown. In some cases, large norm bounds as to where the unknown parameters are located in the parameter space are also assumed to be known. In general, adaptive control deals with LTI plants which cannot be controlled with fixed gain controllers, i.e., nonadaptive control methods, and their parameters even though assumed constant for design and analysis purposes may change over time in an unpredictable manner. Most of the adaptive control approaches for LTI systems use the so-called certainty equivalence principle where a control law motivated from the known parameter case is combined with an adaptive law for estimating on line the unknown parameters. The control law could be associated with different control objectives and the adaptive law with different parameter estimation techniques. These combinations give rise to a wide class of adaptive control schemes. The two popular control objectives that led to a wide range of adaptive control schemes include model reference adaptive control (MRAC) and adaptive pole placement control (APPC). In MRAC, the control objective is for the plant output to track the output of a reference model, designed to represent the desired properties of the plant, for any reference input signal. APPC is more general and is based on control laws whose objective is to set the poles of the closed loop at desired locations chosen based on performance requirements. Another class of adaptive controllers for LTI systems that involves ideas from MRAC and APPC is based on multiple models, search methods, and switching logic. In this class of schemes, the unknown parameter space is partitioned to smaller subsets. For each subset, a parameter estimator or a stabilizing controller is designed or a combination of the two. The problem then is to identify which subset in the parameter space the unknown plant model belongs to and/or which controller is a stabilizing one and meets the control objective. A switching logic is designed based on different considerations to identify the most appropriate plant model or controller from the list of candidate plant models and/or controllers. In this entry, we briefly describe the above approaches to adaptive control for LTI systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Astrom K, Wittenmark B (1995) Adaptive control. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Egardt B (1979) Stability of adaptive controllers. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fekri S, Athans M, Pascoal A (2007) Robust multiple model adaptive control (RMMAC): a case study. Int J Adapt Control Signal Process 21(1):1–30

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin G, Sin K (1984) Adaptive filtering prediction and control. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hespanha JP, Liberzon D, Morse A (2003) Hysteresis-based switching algorithms for supervisory control of uncertain systems. Automatica 39(2):263–272

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou P, Fidan B (2006) Adaptive control tutorial. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou P, Kokotovic P (1983) Adaptive systems with reduced models. Springer, Berlin/New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou P, Sun J (1996) Robust adaptive control. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers M, Ioannou P (2010) Multiple model adaptive control with mixing. IEEE Trans Autom Control 55(8):1822–1836

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Landau Y (1979) Adaptive control: the model reference approach. Marcel Dekker, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Landau I, Lozano R, M’Saad M (1998) Adaptive control. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morse A (1996) Supervisory control of families of linear set-point controllers part I: exact matching. IEEE Trans Autom Control 41(10):1413–1431

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Narendra K, Annaswamy A (1989) Stable adaptive systems. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Narendra K, Balakrishnan J (1997) Adaptive control using multiple models. IEEE Trans Autom Control 42(2):171–187

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sastry S, Bodson M (1989) Adaptive control: stability, convergence and robustness. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanovic M, Safonov M (2011) Safe adaptive control: data-driven stability analysis and robust synthesis. Lecture notes in control and information sciences, vol 405. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao G (2003) Adaptive control design and analysis. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this entry

Cite this entry

Ioannou, P.A. (2014). Adaptive Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems. In: Baillieul, J., Samad, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Systems and Control. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5102-9_111-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5102-9_111-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5102-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics