Skip to main content

The Ethical Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Patient Safety in Surgery
  • 1632 Accesses

Abstract

“Do no harm,” a cornerstone in the foundation of the patient safety movement, is an ethical norm derived from the principle of nonmaleficence. Yet somehow the discussion of ethics remains largely implicit in the public dialogue about patient safety. This chapter provides a review of the ethical perspective on patient safety in surgery through review of the moral obligations and ethical norms that apply in the patient-surgeon relationship versus public health, and a discussion of how to apply these to patient safety in surgery. The chapter concludes with a discussion about next steps for advancing patient safety from an ethics perspective, which includes: a systematic approach to tracking and reporting; increased transparency; improved integration of the research culture; surgeon support and communication skills training; and integration of ongoing ethics education into surgical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, Institute of Medicine; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sharpe VA. Accountability: patient safety and policy reform. In: Sharpe VA, editor. Accountability: patient safety and policy reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pellegrino ED. Prevention of medical error: where professional and organizational ethics meet. In: Sharpe VA, editor. Accountability: patient safety and policy reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Paola F, Barton SS. An ‘ethics gap’ in writing about bioethics: a quantitative comparison of the medical and surgical literature. J Med Ethics. 1995;21(2):84–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sade RM, Williams TH, Perlman DJ, Haney CL, Stroud MR. Ethics gap in surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69(2):326–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hanlon CR. Surgical ethics. Am J Surg. 2004;187(1):1–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wall A, Angelos P, Brown D, Kodner IJ, Keune JD. Ethics in surgery. Curr Probl Surg. 2013;50(3):99–134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McCullough L, Jones J, Brody B. Principles and practice of surgical ethics. In: McCullough L, Jones J, Brody B, editors. Surgical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. p. 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Little M. The fivefold root of an ethics of surgery. Bioethics. 2002;16(3):183–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Angelos P. Orlo Clark and the rise of surgical ethics. World J Surg. 2009;33(3):372–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Adedeji S, Sokol DK, Palser T, McKneally M. Ethics of surgical complications. World J Surg. 2009;33(4):732–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Angelos P. Complications, errors, and surgical ethics. World J Surg. 2009;33(4):609–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Childress JF, Faden RR, Gaare RD, Gostin LO, Kahn J, Bonnie RJ, Kass NE, Mastroianni AC, Moreno JD, Nieburg P. Public health ethics: mapping the terrain. J Law Med Ethics. 2002;30(2):170–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hannawa AF. Principles of medical ethics: implications for the disclosure of medical errors. Medicolegal Bioeth. 2012;2:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. O’connor E, Coates HM, Yardley IE, Wu AW. Disclosure of patient safety incidents: a comprehensive review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2012;22(5):371–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu AW, Boyle DJ, Wallace G, Mazor KM. Disclosure of adverse events in the United States and Canada: an update, and a proposed framework for improvement. J Publ Health Res. 2013;2(3):186–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gallagher TH, Studdert D, Levinson W. Disclosing harmful medical errors to patients. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(26):2713–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stahel PF, Flierl MA, Smith WR, Morgan SJ, Victoroff MS, Clarke TJ, Sabel AL, Mehler PS. Disclosure and reporting of surgical complications: a double-edged sword? Am J Med Qual. 2010;25(5):398–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hannawa AF, Beckman H, Mazor KM, Paul N, Ramsey JV. Building bridges: future directions for medical error disclosure research. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;92(3):319–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mazor KM, Reed GW, Yood RA, Fischer MA, Baril J, Gurwitz JH. Disclosure of medical errors: what factors influence how patients respond? J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(7):704–10.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vincent C, Coulter A. Patient safety: what about the patient? Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11(1):76–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chamberlain CJ, Koniaris LG, Wu AW, Pawlik TM. Disclosure of “nonharmful” medical errors and other events: duty to disclose. Arch Surg. 2012;147(3):282–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pronovost PJ, Goeschel CA, Marsteller JA, Sexton JB, Pham JC, Berenholtz SM. Framework for patient safety research and improvement. Circulation. 2009;119(2):330–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wachter RM. Patient safety at ten: unmistakable progress, troubling gaps. Health Aff. 2010;29(1):165–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Makary M. Unaccountable: what hospitals won’t tell you and how transparency can revolutionize health care. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Angelos P. Ethics and surgical innovation: challenges to the professionalism of surgeons. Int J Surg. 2013;11:S2–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith M, Saunders R, Stuckhardt L, McGinnis JM, editors. Best care at lower cost: the path to continuously learning health care in America. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Miller FG, Emanuel EJ. Quality-improvement research and informed consent. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(8):765–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Brody H, Miller FG. The research‐clinical practice distinction, learning health systems, and relationships. Hastings Cent Rep. 2013;43(5):41–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Largent EA, Joffe S, Miller FG. Can research and care be ethically integrated? Hastings Cent Rep. 2011;41(4):37–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pinto A, Faiz O, Bicknell C, Vincent C. Surgical complications and their implications for surgeons’ well‐being. Br J Surg. 2013;100(13):1748–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shanafelt TD, Balch CM, Bechamps G, Russell T, Dyrbye L, Satele D, et al. Burnout and medical errors among American surgeons. Ann Surg. 2010;251(6):995–1000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Martinez W, Lehmann LS. The “Hidden Curriculum” and residents’ attitudes about medical error disclosure: comparison of surgical and nonsurgical residents. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(6):1145–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily P. Caldes MA .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Caldes, E.P. (2014). The Ethical Perspective. In: Stahel, P., Mauffrey, C. (eds) Patient Safety in Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4369-7_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4369-7_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4368-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4369-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics