Skip to main content

Managing Micro- and Macro-level Design Process Knowledge across Emergent Internet Information System Families

  • Chapter
Industrial Knowledge Management

Abstract

The Internet poses new challenges for information systems development, as it also does in many other practices that worked well in the preceding era that fail as adherents refuse to abandon what was once tried, tested, and now obliviously believed. This chapter integrates various diverse theoretical perspectives from manufacturing, innovation management and diffusion, and social systems research to propose integration of knowledge management as the primary basis for systems development practice. Influences of homophilous networks are analyzed to call for the rejection of the “big-bang” notion of systems delivery. A new approach to viewing an information system as a family instead of an artifact is proposed; challenges to traditional ISD practices in the Internet-centric environment are identified and system level decomposition followed by process knowledge management at both a micro and macro systemic level is explicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Agarwal, G. Krudys, and M. Tanniru, “Infusing Learning into the Information Systems Organization,” European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 6, no. 1, 1997, pp. 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. F. Bass, “New Product Growth for Consumer Durables,” Management Science, vol. 15, no. 1,1969, pp. 215–227.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Berger and Luckmann, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, New york: Anchor Doubleday Books, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Boisot and D. Griffiths, “Possession is Nine Tenths of the Law: Managing a Firm’s Knowledge Base in a Regime of Weak Appropriability,” International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 17, no. 6, 1999, pp. 662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Davenport and L. Prusak, Working Knowledge, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Drucker, Management Challenges for the 21st Century, New York: Harper Business, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Fine, Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage, Reading, MA: Persues Books, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Fisher, K. Ramdas, and K. Ulrich, “Component Sharing in the Management of Product Variety: A Study of Automotive Braking Systems,” Management Science, vol. 45, no. 3, 1999, pp. 297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Glazer, “Measuring the Knower: Towards a Theory of Knowledge Equity,” California Management Review, vol. 40, no. 3, 1998, pp. 175–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Iansiti, Technology Integration: Making Critical Choices in a Dynamic World, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Iansiti and A. MacCormack, “Developing Products on Internet Time,” Harvard Business Review, no. September-October, 1997, pp. 108–117.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Inkpen, “Creating Knowledge Through Collaboration,” California Management Review, vol. 39, no. 1, 1996, pp. 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. B. Kogut and N. Kulatilaka, “Options Thinking and Platforms Investments: Investing in Opportunities,” California Management Review, no. Winter, 1994, pp. 52–71.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Landauer, “Process Modeling in Conceptual Categories,” in Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, 2000, pp. CD-ROM.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Leonard, Wellsprings of Knowledge, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. Leonard, M. Reddy, and J. Aram, “Linking Technology and Institutions: The Innovation Community Framework,” Research Policy, vol. 25, no. 1, 1996, pp. 99–100.

    Google Scholar 

  17. E.Y. Li, “Software Testing in a System Development Process: A Life Cycle Perspective,” Journal of Systems Management, vol. 41, no. 8, 1990, pp. 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. Luhmann, “The Autopoiesis of Social Systems,” in Felix Geyer and Johannes van der Zouwen, ed., Sociocybernetic Paradoxes: Observation, Control and Evolution of Self-steering Systems, London: Sage Publications, 1986, pp. 172–193.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Meyer and A. DeTore, “Product Development for Services,” Academy of Management Executive, vol. 13, no. 3, 1999, pp. 64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Meyer and A. Lehnerd, The Power of Product Platforms: Building Value and Cost Leadership, New York: The Free Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Meyer and J. Utterback, “The Product Family and the Dynamics of Core Capability,” Sloan, no. Spring, 1993, pp. 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Meyer and J. Utterback, “Product Development Cycle Time and Commercial Success,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 42, no. 4, 1995, pp. 297–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. D. Midgley, “A Simple Mathematical Theory of Innovative Behavior,” 4, vol. 1, no. 31–41, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Mullins and D. Sutherland, “New Product Development in Rapidly Changing Markets: An Exploratory Study,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 15, no. 3, 1998, pp. 224–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. L. Nguyen and P. Swatman, “Complementary Use of ad hoc and post hoc Design Rationale for Creating and Organizing Process Knowledge,” in Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, 2000, CD-ROM.

    Google Scholar 

  26. I. Nonaka and H. Takeuchi, The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  27. H. Post, “Modularity in Product Design, Development, and Organization: A Case Study of Baan Company,” in R. Sanchez and A. Heene, ed., Strategic Learning and Knowledge Management, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1997, pp. 189–208.

    Google Scholar 

  28. B. Ramesh, “Factors Influencing Requirements Traceability Practice,” CACM, vol. 41, no. 12, 1998, pp. 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  29. B. Ramesh and V. Dhar, “Supporting Systems Development using Knowledge Captured during Requirements Engineering,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1992, pp.

    Google Scholar 

  30. B. Ramesh and A. Tiwana, “Supporting Collaborative Process Knowledge Management in New Product Development Teams,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 27, no. 1–2, 1999, pp. 213–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. D. Robey and M. Boudreau, Accounting for Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications, Information Systems Research, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1999, pp. 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. E. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, Fourth ed., New York: Free Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  33. M. Rossi, J.-P. Tolvanen, B. Ramesh, K. Lyytinen, and J. Kaipala, “Method Rationale in Method Engineering,” in Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, 2000, CD-ROM.

    Google Scholar 

  34. R. Rycroft and D. Kash, “Managing Complex Networks-Key to 21st Century Innovation Success,” Research Technology Management, no. May–June, 1999, pp. 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  35. R. Saviotti, “Technology Mapping and Evaluation of Technical Change,” International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 10, no. 4/5/6, 1995, pp. 423.

    Google Scholar 

  36. C. Shapiro and H. Varian, “Versioning: The Smart way to Sell Information,” Harvard Business Review, no. November-December, 1998, pp. 16–114.

    Google Scholar 

  37. C. Shapiro and H. Varian, Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  38. M. Tatikonda, “An Empirical Study of Platform and Derivative Product Development Projects,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 16, no. 1, 1999, pp. 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. D. Teece, “Profiting From Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing, and Public Policy,” Research Policy, vol. 15, no. 6, 1986, pp. 285–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. A. Tiwana, “Custom KM: Implementing the Right Knowledge Management Strategy for Your Organization,” Cutter IT Journal (formerly American Programmer), vol. 12, no. 11, 1999, pp. 6–14.

    Google Scholar 

  41. A. Tiwana, The Knowledge Management Toolkit: Practical Techniques for Building a Knowledge Management System, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  42. D.P. Truex, R. Baskerville, and H.K. Klein, “Growing Systems in an Emergent Organization,” CACM, vol. 42, no. 8, 1999, pp. 117–123.

    Google Scholar 

  43. K. Ulrich, “The Role of Product Architecture in the Manufacturing Firm,” Research Policy, vol. 24, 1995, pp. 419–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. S. Wheelright and K. Clark, Revolutionizing New Product Development, New York: Free Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  45. E. Yourdon, Modern Structured Analysis, Yourdon Press computing series, Englewood Cliffs: Yourdon Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tiwana, A. (2001). Managing Micro- and Macro-level Design Process Knowledge across Emergent Internet Information System Families. In: Roy, R. (eds) Industrial Knowledge Management. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0351-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0351-6_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1075-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0351-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics